Abstract
Electron microscope studies show that most of the clay minerals have morphological characteristics which can be effectively used to aid in their identification. In addition, detailed studies at high magnification have provided structural information not obtainable by other means.
In the kaolinite group each of the common minerals has a clear-cut and diagnostic morphology. However, much more work is needed on flint clays and the kaolins in soils before the same can be said of these varieties. Continued study of halloysite reveals significant details pertinent to the form and structure of the tubular crystals.
Illites from different sources show interesting differences in form which reflect variation in the degree of crystallinity. An illite from the Ordovician Oswego formation shows an unusual development of narrow to broad lath-shaped crystals. Except for lower content of iron and magnesium the material has all the characteristics of other illites. The thinnest laths are of the same order of thickness as the flakes of more common illites. Certain mixed-layer minerals are identical in morphology with some varieties of illite.
The minerals of the moutmorillonite group have been the most difficult of the clay minerals to characterize on the basis of morphology. The lath-shaped crystals of certain beidellites, sauconite, nontronite, and hectorite are diagnostic. The metal shadowing technique shows that many of the laths approach one unit cell in thickness.
The morphology of many montmorillonites is dependent upon the mode of sample preparation. The replica method offers a means of studying clay particles in their natural state but this technique is still in the early stages of development as it relates to the clay minerals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Selected References
Bates, T. F., 1947, Investigation of the micaceous minerals in slate: Am. Mineralogist, v. 32, pp. 625–636.
Bates, T. F., 1951, Morphology of layer lattice silicates: Deni-son Univ. Bull., v. 42, pp. 83–91.
Bates, T. F., Hildebrand, F. A., and Swineford, A., 1950, Morphology and structure of endellite and halloysite: Am. Mineralogist, v. 35, pp. 463–484.
Grim, R. E., Bray, R. H., and Bradley, W. F., 1937, The mica in argillaceous sediments: Am. Mineralogist, v. 22, pp. 813–829.
Mathieu-Sieaud, A., Mering, J., and Perrin-Bonnet, I., 1951, Étude au microscope electronique de la montmorillonite et de l’hec-torite saturees par differents cations: Soc. franc, mineralogie Bull., v. 74, pp. 439–456.
Weaver, C. E., 1953, A lath shaped non-expanded dioctahedral 2:1 clay mineral: Am. Mineralogist, v. 38, pp. 279–289.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bates, T.F. Electron Microscopy as a Method of Identifying Clays. Clays Clay Miner. 1, 130–150 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1952.0010117
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1952.0010117