Skip to main content
Log in

Electron Microscopy as a Method of Identifying Clays

  • Part III—Methods of Identifying Clays and the Interpretation of Results
  • Published:
Clays and Clay Minerals

Abstract

Electron microscope studies show that most of the clay minerals have morphological characteristics which can be effectively used to aid in their identification. In addition, detailed studies at high magnification have provided structural information not obtainable by other means.

In the kaolinite group each of the common minerals has a clear-cut and diagnostic morphology. However, much more work is needed on flint clays and the kaolins in soils before the same can be said of these varieties. Continued study of halloysite reveals significant details pertinent to the form and structure of the tubular crystals.

Illites from different sources show interesting differences in form which reflect variation in the degree of crystallinity. An illite from the Ordovician Oswego formation shows an unusual development of narrow to broad lath-shaped crystals. Except for lower content of iron and magnesium the material has all the characteristics of other illites. The thinnest laths are of the same order of thickness as the flakes of more common illites. Certain mixed-layer minerals are identical in morphology with some varieties of illite.

The minerals of the moutmorillonite group have been the most difficult of the clay minerals to characterize on the basis of morphology. The lath-shaped crystals of certain beidellites, sauconite, nontronite, and hectorite are diagnostic. The metal shadowing technique shows that many of the laths approach one unit cell in thickness.

The morphology of many montmorillonites is dependent upon the mode of sample preparation. The replica method offers a means of studying clay particles in their natural state but this technique is still in the early stages of development as it relates to the clay minerals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Selected References

  • Bates, T. F., 1947, Investigation of the micaceous minerals in slate: Am. Mineralogist, v. 32, pp. 625–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. F., 1951, Morphology of layer lattice silicates: Deni-son Univ. Bull., v. 42, pp. 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. F., Hildebrand, F. A., and Swineford, A., 1950, Morphology and structure of endellite and halloysite: Am. Mineralogist, v. 35, pp. 463–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim, R. E., Bray, R. H., and Bradley, W. F., 1937, The mica in argillaceous sediments: Am. Mineralogist, v. 22, pp. 813–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu-Sieaud, A., Mering, J., and Perrin-Bonnet, I., 1951, Étude au microscope electronique de la montmorillonite et de l’hec-torite saturees par differents cations: Soc. franc, mineralogie Bull., v. 74, pp. 439–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. E., 1953, A lath shaped non-expanded dioctahedral 2:1 clay mineral: Am. Mineralogist, v. 38, pp. 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bates, T.F. Electron Microscopy as a Method of Identifying Clays. Clays Clay Miner. 1, 130–150 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1952.0010117

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1952.0010117

Navigation