Advertisement

Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 66, Issue 3, pp 220–232 | Cite as

Quantitative X-Ray Powder Diffraction and the Illite Polytype Analysis Method for Direct Fault Rock Dating: A Comparison of Analytical Techniques

  • Austin BolesEmail author
  • Anja M. Schleicher
  • John Solum
  • Ben van der Pluijm
Article

Abstract

Illite polytypes are used to elucidate the geological record of formations, such as the timing and provenance of deformations in geological structures and fluids, so the ability to characterize and identify them quantitatively is key. The purpose of the present study was to compare three X-ray powder diffraction (Q-XRPD) methods for illite polytype quantification for practical application to directly date clay-rich fault rocks and constrain the provenance of deformation-related fluids in clay-rich brittle rocks of the upper crust. The methods compared were WILDFIRE© (WF) modeling, End-member Standards Matching (STD), and Rietveld whole-pattern matching (BGMN®). Each technique was applied to a suite of synthetic mixtures of known composition as well as to a sample of natural clay gouge (i.e. the soft material between a vein wall and the solid vein). The analytical uncertainties achieved for these synthetic samples using WF modeling, STD, and Rietveld methods were ±4–5%, ±1%, and ±6%, respectively, with the caveat that the end-member clay mineral used for matching was the same mineral sample used in the test mixture. Various particle size fractions of the gouge were additionally investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to determine polytypes and laser particle size analysis to determine grain size distributions. The three analytical techniques produced similar 40Ar/39Ar authigenesis ages after unmixing, which indicated that any of the methods can be used to directly date the formation of fault-related authigenic illite. Descriptions were included for pre-calculated WF illite polytype diffractogram libraries, model endmembers were fitted to experimental data using a least-squares algorithm, and mixing spreadsheet programs were used to match end-member natural reference samples.

Key Words

Fault Gouge Dating Illite Illite Polytypes Quantitative X-ray Powder Diffraction Rietveld Method Transmission Electron Microscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergmann, J., Friedel, P., and Kleeberg, R. (1998) BGMN — a new fundamental parameter based Rietveld program for laboratory X-ray sources, it’s use in quantitative analysis and structure investigations. Commission on Powder Diffraction Newsletter 20, 5–8.Google Scholar
  2. Bergmann, J. and Kleeberg, R. (1998) Rietveld Analysis of Disordered Layer Silicates. Materials Science Forum, 278-281, 300–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boles, A., van der Pluijm, B., Mulch, A., Mutlu, H., Uysal, I.T., and Warr, L.N. (2015) Hydrogen and 40Ar/39Ar isotope evidence for multiple and protracted paleofluid flow events within the long-lived North Anatolian Keirogen (Turkey). Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 16, 1975–1987, doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheary, B.Y.R.W. and Coelho, A. (1992) A fundamental parameters approach to X-ray line-profile fitting. Journal of Applied Crystallograpy 25, 109–121, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889891010804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clauer, N. (2013) The K-Ar and 40Ar/39Ar methods revisited for dating fine-grained K-bearing clay minerals. Chemical Geology, 354, 163–185, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.05.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Covey, M.C., Vrolijk, P.J., and Pevear, D.R. (1994) Direct dating of fault movement in the Rocky Mountain Front Range. Geological Society of America Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, A–467.Google Scholar
  7. Dalla Torre, M., Stern, W.B., and Frey, M. (1994) Determination of white K-mica polytype ratios: Comparison of different XRD methods. Clay Minerals, 29, 717–726.Google Scholar
  8. Dietel, J. (2015) Mineralogical and Chemical Properties of Thermally Treated and Ground Illitic Clays as Precursor Materials for Geopolymer Binders. PhD dissertation, University of Greifswald, Germany.Google Scholar
  9. Dong, H., Hall, C.M., Peacor, D.R., Halliday, A.N., and Pevear, D.R. (2000) Thermal 40Ar/39Ar separation of diagenetic from detrital illitic clays in Gulf Coast shales. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 175, 309–325, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00294-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drits, V.A., Weber, F., Salyn, A.L., and Tsipursky, S.I. (1993) X-ray identification of one-layer illite varieties: Application to the study of illites around uranium deposits of Canada. Clays and Clay Minerals, 41, 389–398, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1993.0410316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudek, T., Środoón, J., Eberl, D.D., Elsass, F., and Uhlik, P. (2002) Thickness distribution of illite crystals in shales. I: X-ray diffraction vs. high-resolution transmission electron microscopy measurements: Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 562–577, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1346/000986002320679305.Google Scholar
  12. Fitz-Diaz, E. and van der Pluijm, B. (2013) Fold dating: A new Ar/Ar illite dating application to constrain the age of deformation in shallow crustal rocks. Journal of Structural Geology, 54, 174–179, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2013.05.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grathoff, G. and Moore, D. (1996) Illite polytype quantification using WILDFIRE© calculated X-ray diffraction patterns. Clays and Clay Minerals, 44, 835–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haines, S., Lynch, E., Mulch, A., Valley, J.W., and van der Pluijm, B. (2016) Meteoric fluid infiltration in crustal-scale normal fault systems as indicated by δ 18O and δ 2H geochemistry and 40Ar/39Ar dating of neoformed clays in brittle fault rocks. Lithosphere, 8, L483.1, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1130/L483.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haines, S.H. and van der Pluijm, B.A. (2008) Clay quantification and Ar-Ar dating of synthetic and natural gouge: Application to the Miocene Sierra Mazatán detachment fault, Sonora, Mexico. Journal of Structural Geology, 30, 525–538, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2007.11.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haines, S.H. and van der Pluijm, B.A. (2012) Patterns of mineral transformations in clay gouge, with examples from low-angle normal fault rocks in the western USA. Journal of Structural Geology, 43, 2–32, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hnat, J.S. and van der Pluijm, B.A. (2014) Fault gouge dating in the Southern Appalachians, USA. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 126, 639–651, doi: 10.1130/B30905.1.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffman, J., Hower, J., and Aronson, J.L. (1976) Radiometric dating of time of thrusting in the disturbed belt of Montana. Geology, 4, 16–20, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1130/0091 - 7613(1976)4<16:RDOTOT>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hower, J., Hurley, P.M., Pinson, W.H., and Fairbairn, H.W. (1963) The dependence of K-Ar age on the mineralogy of various particle size ranges in a shale. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 27, 405–410, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(63)90080-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaufhold, S., Hein, M., Dohrmann, R., and Ufer, K. (2012) Quantification of the mineralogical composition of clays using FTIR spectroscopy. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 59, 29–39, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2011.12.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keller, W.D. and Haenni, R.P. (1978) Efects of micro-sized mixtures of kaolin minerals on properties of kaolinites. Clays and Clay Minerals, 26, 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleeberg, R. (2009) State-of-the-art and trends in quantitative phase analysis of geological and raw materials. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie Supplements, 30, 47–52, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1524/zksu.2009.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lonker, S.W. and Fitz Gerald, J.D. (1990) Formation of coexisting 1M and 2M polytypes in illite from an active hydrothermal system. American Mineralogist, 75, 1282–1289.Google Scholar
  24. Mahon, K. (1996) The New “York” regression: Application of an improved statist ical method to geochemistry. International Geology Review, 38, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maxwell, D.T. and Hower, J. (1967) High-grade diagenesis and low-grade metamorphism of illite in the Precambrian belt series. American Mineralogist, 52, 843–857.Google Scholar
  26. Merriman, R.J., Roberts, B., and Peacor, D.R. (1990) A transmission electron microscope study of white mica crystallite size distribution in a mudstone to slate transitional sequence, North Wales, UK. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 106, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore, D.M. and Reynolds, R.C., Jr. (1997), X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Morad, S., Worden, R., and Ketzer, J. (2009) Oxygen and hydrogen isotopic composition of diagenetic clay minerals in sandstones: A review of the data and controls. in: Clay Mineral Cements in Sandstones (R.H. Worden and S. Morad, editors), pp. 63–91, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304336.ch3.Google Scholar
  29. Panaă, D.I. and van der Pluijm, B.A. (2015) Orogenic pulses in the Alberta Rocky Mountains: Radiometric dating of major faults and comparison with the regional tectono-stratigraphic record. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 127, 480–502, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1130/B31069.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peacor, D.R., Bauluz, B., Dong, H., Tillick, D., and Yan, Y. (2002) Transmission and analytical electron microscopy evidence for high Mg contents of 1M illite: Absence of 1M polytypism in normal prograde diagenetic sequences of pelitic rocks. Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 757–765, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1346/000986002762090281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pevear, D.R. (1992) Illite age analysis, a new tool for basin thermal history analysis. Pp. 1251–1254 in: Water-rock Interaction (Y.K. Kharaka and A.S. Maest, editors). Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction: WRI-7. Park City, Utah, USA, 13–18 July 1992. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  32. Reynolds, R.C., Jr. (1994) Wildfire: A Computer Program for the Calculation of Three-dimensional Powder X-ray diffraction Patterns for Mica Polytypes and their Disordered Variations. R.C. Reynolds, 8 Brook Rd., Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.Google Scholar
  33. Reynolds, R.C. and Thomson, C.H. (1993) Illite from the Potsdam Sandstone of New York: A probable noncentrosymmetric mica structure. Clays and Clay Minerals, 41, 66–72, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1993.0410107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rietveld, H.M. (1969) A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 2, 65–71, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889869006558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rietveld, H.M. (1967) Line profiles of neutron powderdiffraction peaks for structure refinement. Acta Crystallographica, 22, 151–152, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X67000234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savin, S. and Epstein, S. (1970) The oxygen and hydrogen isotope geochemistry of clay minerals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 34, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schleicher, A.M., Warr, L.N., and van der Pluijm, B.A. (2008) On the origin of mixed-layered clay minerals from the San Andreas Fault at 2.5-3 km vertical depth (SAFOD drillhole at Parkfield, California). Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 157, 173–187, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-008-0328-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Solum, J.G. (2003) Influence of phyllosilicate mineral assemblages, fabrics, and fluids on the behavior of the Punchbowl fault, southern California. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 1–12, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB001858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Solum, J.G. and van der Pluijm, B.A. (2007) Reconstructing the Snake River-Hoback River Canyon section of the Wyoming thrust belt through direct dating of clay-rich fault rocks, in: Whence the Mountains? Inquiries into the Evolution of Orogenic Systems: A Volume in Honor of Raymond A. Price (J.W. Sears, T.A. Harms, and C.A. Evenchick, editors). Geological Society of America Special Paper 433, 183–196Google Scholar
  40. Solum, J.G., van der Pluijm, B.A., and Peacor, D.R. (2005) Neocrystallization, fabrics and age of clay minerals from an exposure of the Moab Fault, Utah. Journal of Structural Geology, 27, 1563–1576, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2005.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Staisch, L.M. (2014) The Tectonic Evolution of the Hoh Xil Basin and Kunlun Shan: Implications for the Uplift History of the Northern Tibetan Plateau. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Tettenhorst, R.T. and Corbató, C.E. (1993) Quantitative analysis of mixtures of 1M and 2M1 dioctahedral micas by X-ray diffraction. Clays and Clay Minerals, 41, 45–55, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1993.0410105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Toby, B.H. (2006) R factors in Rietveld analysis: How good is good enough? Powder Diffraction, 21, 67–70, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1154/1.2179804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ufer, K., Stanjek, H., Roth, G., Dohrmann, R., Kleeberg, R., and Kaufhold, S. (2008) Quantitative phase analysis of bentonites by the Rietveld method. Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 272–282, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2008.0560210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uhlík, P., Šucha, V., Elsass, F., and ČaploviČovČ, M. (2000) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy of mixedlayer clays dispersed in PVP-10: A new technique to distinguish detrital and authigenic illitic material. Clay Minerals, 35, 781–789, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1180/000985500547232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van der Pluijm, B.A. and Hall, C. (2015) Fault zone (thermochronology) in: Encyclopedia of Scientific Dating Methods (W.J. Rink and J.W. Thompson, editors), Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  47. van der Pluijm, B.A., Hall, C.M., Vrolijk, P.J., Pevear, D.R., and Covey, M.C. (2001) The dating of shallow faults in the Earth’s crust. Nature, 412, 172–175, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/35084053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Velde, B. and Hower, J. (1963) Petrological significance of illite polymorphism in Paleozoic sedimentary rocks. American Mineralogist, 48, 1239–1254.Google Scholar
  49. Verdel, C., van der Pluijm, B.A., and Niemi, N. (2012) Variation of illite/muscovite 40Ar/39Ar age spectra during progressive low-grade metamorphism: An example from the US Cordillera. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 164, 521–536, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-012-0751-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warr, L.N., Hofmann, H., and van der Pluijm, B.A. (2016) Constraining the alteration history of a Late Cretaceous Patagonian volcaniclastic bentonite—ash-mudstone sequence using K-Ar and 40Ar/39Ar isotopes. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 106, 255–268, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-016-1315-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wijbrans, J.R. and McDougall, I. (1986) 40Ar/39Ar dating of white micas from an alpine high-pressure metamorphic belt on Naxos (Greece): The resetting of the argon isotopic system. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 93, 187–194, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00371320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wirth, R. (2009) Focused Ion Beam (FIB ) combined with SEM and TEM: Advanced analytical tools for studies of chemical composition, microstructure and crystal structure in geomaterials on a nanometre scale. Chemical Geology, 261, 217–229, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00371320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ylagan, R.F., Kim, C.S., Pevear, D.R., and Vrolijk, P.J. (2002) Illite polytype quantification for accurate K-Ar age determination. American Mineralogist, 87, 1536–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zwingmann, H. and Mancktelow, N. (2004) Timing of alpine fault gouges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 223, 415–425, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j-epsl.2004.04.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clay Minerals Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Austin Boles
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anja M. Schleicher
    • 2
  • John Solum
    • 3
  • Ben van der Pluijm
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Helmholtz Center PotsdamGFZ German Research Center for GeosciencesTelegrafenberg, PotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Shell International Exploration and Production, Inc.Shell Technology Center HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations