Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 86–95 | Cite as

Low-Frequency Electrical Conductivity of Aqueous Kaolinite Suspensions II: Counterion Effects and Estimating Stern Layer Mobilities of Counterions

  • Christian WeberEmail author
  • Matthias Halisch
  • Helge Stanjek


The electrical state of the interface between a kaolinite-dominated clay sample and aqueous electrolyte solutions was characterized using low-frequency conductance measurements. From these measurements, the ζ-potential and surface conductivity contributions from the diffuse and non-diffuse parts of the electrical double layer were obtained. The suspensions were studied as a function of volume fraction, electrolyte concentration, and electrolyte type (LiCl, NaCl, KCl, CsCl, CaCl2, SrCl2, and BaCl2). Interpretation in terms of the surface conductance revealed that a substantial part of the surface conductivity originates in the inner part of the double layer. Electrokinetic potentials and related diffuse double layer properties are highly dependent on the nature of monovalent counterions, whereas divalent counterions do not show such clear dependencies. Further presented was a simple way to estimate the order of magnitude of counterion mobilities in the inner part of the electrical double layer. All counterions were shown to have a substantial mobility in the inner part of the double layer. Finally, we suggest that the apparent ion-specific effects observed in the diffuse part of the double layer are at least in part related to the finite size of the counterions. Our findings are relevant to scenarios where fluid flow in porous media is accompanied by charged species transport, e.g., in electro-osmotic remediation, spectral-induced polarization, or permeability measurements.

Key Words

Kaolinite Spectral-induced Polarization Stern Layer Mobility Surface Charge Density Surface Conductance Zeta Potential 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aranda-Rasćon, M.J., Grosse, C., López-García, J.J., and Horno, J. (2009a) Electrokinetics of suspended charged particles taking into account the excluded volume effect. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 335, 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aranda-Rasćon, M.J., Grosse, C., López-García, J.J., and Horno, J. (2009b) Influence of the finite ion size on the predictions of the standard electrokinetic model: Frequency response. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 366, 857–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biesheveul, P.M. and van Soestbergen, M. (2007) Counterion volume effects in mixed electrical double layers. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 316, 490–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bikerman, J.J. (1942) XXXIX. Structure and capacity of electrical double layer. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 33, 384–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breeuwsma, A. and Lyklema, J. (1971) Interfacial electrochemistry of hematite (α-Fe2O3). Discussions of the Faraday Society, 52, 324–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunauer, S., Emmett, P.H., and Teller, E. (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 60: 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chassagne, C., Mietta, F., and Winterwerp J.C. (2009) Electrokinetic study of kaolinite suspensions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 336, 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delgado, A.V., Gonzalez-Caballero, F., Hunter, R.J., Koopal, L.K., and Lyklema, J. (2007) Measurement and interpretation of electrokinetic phenomena. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 209, 194–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Djerdjev, A.M., Beattie, J.K., and Hunter, R.J. (2003) An electroacoustic and high-frequency dielectric response study of stagnant layer conduction in emulsion systems. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 265, 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dove, M. and Craven, C.M. (2005) Surface charge density on silica in alkali and alkaline earth chloride electrolyte solutions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69, 4963–4970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dzenitis, J.M. (1997) Soil chemistry effects and flow prediction in electroremediation of soil. Environmental Science & Technology, 31, 1191–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jennings, B.R. and Parslow, K. (1988) Particle size measurement: The equivalent spherical diameter. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Physical, Mathematical and Engineering Sciences, 419, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiménez, M.L., Arroyo, F.J., Carrique, U., Kaatze, F., and Delgado, A.V. (2005) Determination of stagnant layer conductivity in polystyrene suspensions: Temperature effects. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 281, 503–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kruschwitz, S., Binley, A., Lesmes, D., and Elshenawy, A. (2010) Textural controls on low frequency electrical spectra of porous media. Geophysics, 75, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kruschwitz, S., Carsten Prinz, C., and Zimathies, A. (2016) Study into the correlation of dominant pore throat size and SIP relaxation frequency. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 135, 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kruyt, H.R. and Klompé, M.A.M. (1943) Solkonzentration und Flockung beim AgJ-sol. Kolloid-Beihefte, 54, 484–553.Google Scholar
  17. Labbez, C., Fievet, P., Szymczyk, A., Simon, C., Vidonne, A., Foissy, A., and Pagetti, J. (2001) Hydraulic resistance measurements combined with electrical or diffusional resistance measurements for determination of pore size in MF membranes. Desalination, 141, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Löbbus, M., van Leeuwen, H., and Lyklema, J. (2000) Streaming potentials and conductivities of latex plugs: Influence of the valency of the counterion. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 161, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopez-García, J.J. and Horno, J. (2011) Poisson-Boltzmann description of electrical double layer including ion size effects. Langmuir, 27, 13970–13974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lyklema, J. (1995) Electrokinetics and related phenomena. Chapter 4, pp. 4.1–4.135 in: Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science (J. Lyklema, editor) Volume II, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. Lyklema, J. (2001) Surface conduction. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 13, 5027–5034.Google Scholar
  22. Lyklema, J. (2002) Specificity in the statics and dynamics of surface-confined ions. Molecular Physics, 100, 3177–3185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyklema, J. (2003) Lyotropic sequences in colloid stability revisited. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 100-102, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyklema, J. and Minor, M. (1998) On surface conduction and its role in electrokinetics. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 140, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marcus, Y. (1988) Ionic radii in aqueous solutions. Chemical Reviews, 88, 1475–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Minor, M., van Leeuwen, H.P., and Lyklema, J. (1998a) Low-frequency dielectric response of polystyrene latex dispersions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 206, 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Minor, M., van der Linde, A.J., and Lyklema, J. (1998b) Streaming potentials and conductivities of latex plugs in indifferent electrolytes. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 203, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Brien, R.W. and Rowlands, W.N. (1993) Measuring the surface conductance of kaolinite particles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 159, 471–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Brien, R.W. and Ward, D.N. (1988) The electrophoresis of a spheroid with a thin double layer. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 121, 402-413.Google Scholar
  30. Rasmussen, M., Rowlands, W.N., O’Brien, R.W., and Hunter, R.J. (1997) The dynamic mobility and dielectric response of sodium bentonite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 189, 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Revil. A. (2012) Spectral induced polarization of shaly sands: Influence of the electrical double layer. Water Resources Research, 48, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Revil, A. (2014) Discussion Comment on: “On the relationship between induced polarization and surface conductivity: Implications for petrophysical interpretation of electrical measurements”. Geophysics, 79, X1–X10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Revil, A. and Florsch, N. (2010) Determination of permeability from spectral induced polarization in granular media. Geophysical Journal International, 181, 1480–1498.Google Scholar
  34. Rouquerol, J., Avnir, D., Fairbridge, D.H., Everett, C., Haynes, J.H., Pernicone, N., Ramsay, J.D.F., Sing, K.S.W., and Unger, K.K. (1994) Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 66, 1739–1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rowlands, W.N. and O’Brien, R.W. (1995) The dynamic mobility and dielectric response of kaolinite particles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 175, 190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scott, J.B.T. and Barker, R.D. (2005) Characterization of sandstone by electrical spectroscopy for stratigraphical and hydrogeological investigations. Quarterly Journal of Engineering and Geology and Hydrogeology, 38, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Slepetys, R.A. and Cleland, A.J. (1993) Determination of shape of kaolin pigment particles. Clay Minerals, 28, 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tarasov, A. and Titov, K. (2007) Relaxation time distribution from time domain induced polarization measurements. Geophysical Journal International, 170, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Verbich, S.V., Dukhin, S.S., and Matsumura, H. (1999). Investigation of dynamic stern layer of liposomes by measurements of conductivity and electrophoresis. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 20, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weber, C. and Stanjek, H. (2017) Low-frequency electric conductivity of aqueous kaolinite suspensions: Surface conductance, electrokinetic potentials and counterion mobility. Clay Minerals, 52, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weber, C., Heuser, M., Mertens, G., and Stanjek, H. (2014) Determination of clay mineral aspect ratios from conductometric titrations. Clay Minerals, 49, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weller, A. and Slater, L. (2015) Induced polarization dependence on pore space geometry: Empirical observations and mechanistic predictions. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 123, 310–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weller, A., Slater, L., and Nordsiek, S. (2013) On the relationship between induced polarization and surface conductivity: Implications for petrophysical interpretation of electrical measurements. Geophysics, 78, D315–D325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weller, A., Zhang, Z., and Slater, L. (2015) High-salinity polarization of sandstones. Geophysics, 80, D309–D318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weller, A., Zhang, Z., Slater, L., Kruschwitz, S., and Halisch, M. (2016) Induced polarization and pore radius — A discussion. Geophysics, 81, D519–D526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clay Minerals Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Weber
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthias Halisch
    • 2
  • Helge Stanjek
    • 1
  1. 1.Clay and Interface MineralogyRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Dept. 5 Petrophysics and Borehole GeophysicsLeibniz Institute for Applied GeophysicsHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations