Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 61–73 | Cite as

Modifications of 2:1 Clay Minerals in a Kaolinite-Dominated Ultisol under Changing Land-Use Regimes

  • Jason C. AustinEmail author
  • Amelia Perry
  • Daniel D. Richter
  • Paul A. Schroeder


Chemical denudation and chemical weathering rates vary under climatic, bedrock, biotic, and topographic conditions. Constraints for landscape evolution models must consider changes in these factors on human and geologic time scales. Changes in nutrient dynamics, related to the storage and exchange of K+ in clay minerals as a response to land use change, can affect the rates of chemical weathering and denudation. Incorporation of these changes in landscape evolution models can add insight into how land use changes affect soil thickness and erodibility. In order to assess changes in soil clay mineralogy that result from land-use differences, the present study contrasts the clay mineral assemblages in three proximal sites that were managed differently over nearly the past two centuries where contemporary vegetation was dominated by old hardwood forest, old-field pine, and cultivated biomes. X-ray diffraction (XRD) of the oriented clay fraction using K-, Mg-, and Na-saturation treatments for the air-dried, ethylene glycol (Mg-EG and K-EG) solvated, and heated (100, 350, and 550°C) states were used to characterize the clay mineral assemblages. XRD patterns of degraded biotite (oxidized Fe and expelled charge-compensating interlayer K) exhibited coherent scattering characteristics similar to illite. XRD patterns of the Mg-EG samples were, therefore, accurately modeled using NEWMOD2® software by the use of mineral structure files for discrete illite, vermiculite, kaolinite, mixed-layer kaolinite-smectite, illite-vermiculite, kaolinite-illite, and hydroxy-interlayered vermiculite. The soil and upper saprolite profiles that formed on a Neoproterozoic gneiss in the Calhoun Experimental Forest in South Carolina, USA, revealed a depth-dependence for the deeply weathered kaolinitic to the shallowly weathered illitic/vermiculitic mineral assemblages that varied in the cultivated, pine, and hardwood sites, respectively. An analysis of archived samples that were collected over a five-decade growth period from the pine site suggests that the content of illite-like layers increased at the surface within 8 y. Historical management of the sites has resulted in different states of dynamic equilibrium, whereby deep rooting at the hardwood and pine sites promotes nutrient uplift of K from the weathering of orthoclase and micas. Differences in the denudation rates at the cultivated, pine, and hardwood sites through time were reflected by changes in the soil clay mineralogy. Specifically, an increased abundance of illite-like layers in the surface soils can serve as a reservoir of K+.

Key Words

Calhoun Experimental Forest Degraded Biotite Kaolinitic Ultisol X-ray Pattern Modeling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bacon, A.R. (2014) Pedogenesis and Anthropedogenesis on the Southern Piedmont. Doctor of Philosophy PhD thesis. Duke University, Durham, NC. Bacon_duke_0066D_12361.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. Balogh-Brunstad, Z., Keller, C.K., Bormann, B.T., O’Brien, R., Wang, D., and Hawley, G. (2008) Chemical weathering and chemical denudation dynamics through ecosystem development and disturbance. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22,
  3. Barre, P., Montagnier, C., Chenu, C., Abbadie, L., and Velde, B. (2008a) Clay minerals as a soil potassium reservoir: Observation and quantification through X-ray diffraction. Plant and Soil, 302, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barre, P., Velde, B., and Abbadie, L. (2007a) Dynamic role of “illite-like” clay minerals in temperate soils: Facts and hypotheses. Biogeochemistry, 82, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barre, P., Velde, B., Catel, N., and Abbadie, L. (2007b) Soilplant potassium transfer: Impact of plant activity on clay minerals as seen from X-ray diffraction. Plant and Soil, 292, 37–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barre, P., Velde, B., Fontaine, C., Catel, N., and Abbadie, L. (2008b) Which 2:1 clay minerals are involved in the soil potassium reservoir? Insights from potassium addition or removal experiments on three temperate grassland soil clay assemblages. Geoderma, 146, 216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calvaruso, C., Mareschal, L., Turpault, M.P., and Leclerc, E. (2009) Rapid clay weathering in the rhizosphere of Norway spruce and oak in an acid forest ecosystem. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chartier, M.P., Rostagno, C.M., and Videla, L.S. (2013) Selective erosion of clay, organic carbon and total nitrogen in grazed semiarid rangelands of northeastern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments, 88, 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook, C.W., Brecheisen, Z., and Richter, D. (2015) Calhoun CZO - Vegetation - Tree Survey (2014–2017). Scholar
  10. Cornu, S., Montagne, D., Hubert, F., Barre, P., and Caner, L. (2012) Evidence of short-term clay evolution in soils under human impact. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 344, 747–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Stefano, C. and Ferro, V. (2002) Linking clay enrichment and sediment delivery processes. Biosystems Engineering, 81, 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hack, J.T. (1960) Interpretation of erosional topography in humid temperate regions. American Journal of Science, 258, 80–97.Google Scholar
  13. Hinsinger, P., Jaillard, B., and Dufey, J.E. (1992) Rapid weathering of a trioctahedral mica by the roots of ryegrass. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56, 977–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hong, H., Cheng, F., Yin, K., Churchman, G.J., and Wang, C. (2015) Three-component mixed-layer illite/smectite/kaolinite (I/S/K) minerals in hydromorphic soils, South China. American Mineralogist, 100, 1883–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hong, H., Churchman, G.J., Gu, Y., Yin, K., and Wang, C. (2012) Kaolinite-smectite mixed-layer clays in the Jiujiang red soils and their climate significance. Geoderma, 173, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horton, J.W. and Dicken, C.L. (2001) Preliminary Digital Geologic Map of the Appalachian Piedmont and Blue Ridge, South Carolina Segment. U. S. Geological Survey. Scholar
  17. Hubert, F., Caner, L., Meunier, A., and Ferrage, E. (2012) Unraveling complex <2 mm clay mineralogy from soils using X-ray diffraction profile modeling on particle-size sub-fractions: Implications for soil pedogenesis and reactivity. American Mineralogist, 97, 384–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hubert, F., Caner, L., Meunier, A., and Lanson, B. (2009) Advances in characterization of soil clay mineralogy using X-ray diffraction: From decomposition to profile fitting. European Journal of Soil Science, 60, 1093–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jobbagy, E.G. and Jackson, R.B. (2004) The uplift of soil nutrients by plants: Biogeochemical consequences across scales. Ecology, 85, 2380–2389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kingery, W.L., Han, F.X., Shaw, D.R., Gerard, P.D., and McGregor, K.C. (2002) Mineralogical and organic carbon content of water-dispersible particles from conventional and no-tillage soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 33, 947–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lanson, B. (1997) Decomposition of experimental X-ray diffraction patterns (profile fitting): A convenient way to study clay minerals. Clays and Clay Minerals, 45, 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Markewitz, D. and Richter, D.D. (2000) Long-term soil potassium availability from a Kanhapludult to an aggraging Loblolly pine ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management, 130, 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matocha, C.J., Grove, J.H., Karathanasis, T.D., and Vandiviere, M. (2016) Changes in soil mineralogy due to nitrogen fertilization in an agroecosystem. Geoderma, 263, 176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Metz, L.J. (1958) The Calhoun Experimental Forest. Pp. 24. in: Miscellaneous Publication, USDA U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Ashville, North Carolina, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  25. Moore, D.M. and Reynolds, R.C., Jr. (1997) X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals. 2nd Edition. Pp. 378. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. NCALM. National Center for Airborne Laser Mapping (2016) Leaf-off LiDAR Survey of the Calhoun Critical Zone Observatory. Scholar
  27. Officer, S.J., Tillman, R.W., Palmer, A.S., and Whitton, J.S. (2006) Variability of clay mineralogy in two New Zealand steep-land topsoils under pasture. Geoderma, 132, 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palis, R.G., Ghandiri, H., Rose, C.W., and Saffigna, P.G. (1997) Soil erosion and nutrient loss. III. Changes in the enrichment ratio of total nitrogen and organic carbon under rainfall detachment and entrainment. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 35, 891–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pernes-Debuyser, A., Pernes, M., Velde, B., and Tessier, D. (2003) Soil mineralogy evolution in the INRA 42 Plots Experiment (Versailles, France). Clays and Clay Minerals, 51, 577–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richter, D.D. and Markewitz, D. (1995) How deep is soil? BioScience, 45, 600–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richter, D.D. and Markewitz, D. (2001) Understanding Soil Change: Soil Sustainability Over Millennia, Centuries, and Decades. Pp. 255. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
  32. Tice, K.R., Graham, R.C., and Wood, H.B. (1996) Transformations of 2:1 phyllosilicates in 41-year-old soils under oak and pine. Geoderma, 70, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Toby, B.H. (2006) R factors in Rietveld analysis: How good is good enough? Powder Diffraction, 21, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tributh, H., Vonboguslawski, E., Vonlieres, A., Steffens, D., and Mengel, K. (1987) Effect of potassium removal by crops on transformation of illitic clay-minerals. Soil Science, 143, 404–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Turpault, M.P., Righi, D., and Uterano, C. (2008) Clay minerals: Precise markers of the spatial and temporal variability of the biogeochemical soil environment. Geoderma, 147, 108–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tye, A.M., Kemp, S.J., and Poulton, P.R. (2009) Responses of soil clay mineralogy in the Rothamsted classical experiments in relation to management practice and changing land use. Geoderma, 153, 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Velde, B. and Peck, T. (2002) Clay mineral changes in the Morrow Experimental Plots, University of Illinois. Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 364–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Viennet, J.C., Hubert, F., Ferrage, E., Tertre, E., Legout, A., and Turpault, M.P. (2015) Investigation of clay mineralogy in a temperate acidic soil of a forest using X-ray diffraction profile modeling: Beyond the HIS and HIV description. Geoderma, 241, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yuan, H. and Bish, D.L. (2010) Newmod plus, a new version of the Newmod program for interpreting X-ray powder diffraction patterns from interstratified clay minerals. Clays and Clay Minerals, 58, 318–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clay Minerals Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason C. Austin
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Amelia Perry
    • 2
  • Daniel D. Richter
    • 1
  • Paul A. Schroeder
    • 2
  1. 1.Nicholas School of the EnvironmentDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations