Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 319–327 | Cite as

Dynamic Rheological Properties of Sodium Pyrophosphate-Modified Bentonite Suspensions for Liquefaction Mitigation

  • Jisuk YoonEmail author
  • Chadi El Mohtar


The delivery of plastic fines such as bentonite into loose saturated granular soil deposits is an effective method for mitigating the liquefaction phenomenon. While the bentonite should be injected into the deposits in the form of a concentrated suspension, such application is limited in practice because of the low mobility of the suspension. The initial mobility of the bentonite suspension should be managed in order to increase the penetration depth. On the other hand, the suspension needs to maintain its thixotropic nature to improve the resistance of the treated soils under cyclic loading over time. The objective of the present study was to investigate the dynamic rheological properties of the bentonite suspensions modified with an ionic additive, sodium pyrophosphate (SPP), to evaluate a possible application of the modified suspensions in mitigation of liquefaction. In the present study, the storage and loss modulus of SPP-modified bentonite suspensions were measured using a strain-sweep (oscillatory shear) technique. Bentonite suspensions with clay contents of 5, 7.5, 10, and 12 wt.% (by total weight of suspension) were tested at various SPP concentrations (0 to 4 wt.% by weight of dry bentonite). The time-dependent behavior of the suspensions was evaluated with a critical storage modulus at various resting times (0 to 480 h). The results showed that the initial critical storage modulus decreased significantly with increasing SPP concentrations, but the reduced critical storage modulus increased gradually with resting times. This initial reduction in critical storage modulus is attributed to a reduction of the inter-aggregated 3-D networks due to the presence of SPP; the amount of 3-D network formed in a suspension governs the critical storage modulus. With time, the networks are formed gradually, resulting in recovery of critical storage modulus. The normalized modulus was degraded more slowly in the modified suspensions than in the unmodified suspensions, which is a desirable property of the suspensions for mitigation of liquefaction.

Key Words

Bentonite Suspension Liquefaction Mitigation Permeation Grouting Sodium Pyrophosphate Thixotropy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abend, S. and Lagaly, G. (2000) Sol-gel transitions of sodium montmorillonite dispersions. Applied Clay Science, 16, 201–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelsson, M. and Gustafson, G. (2007) Grouting with high water-cement ratios — literature and laboratory study. Report no. 2007:5, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.Google Scholar
  3. Clarke, J.P. (2008) Investigation of time-dependent rheological behavior of sodium pyrophosphate-bentonite suspensions. M.S. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
  4. de Kretser, R.G. and Boger, D.V. (2001) A structural model for the time-dependent mineral suspensions. Rheologica Acta, 40, 582–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. El Mohtar, C.S., Clarke, J.P., Bobet, A., Santagata, M., Drnevich, V., and Johnston, C. (2008) Cyclic response of a sand with thixotropic pore fluid. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV (GSP 181), May 18–22, Sacramento, California, USA, pp. 13-10.Google Scholar
  6. El Mohtar, C., Bobet, A., Santagata, M., Drnevich, V., and Johnston, C. (2013) Liquefaction mitigation using bentonite suspensions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental. Engineering, 139, 1369–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gallagher, P.M. and Mitchell, J.L. (2002) Influence of colloidal silica grout on liquefaction potential and cyclic undrained behavior of loose sand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22, 1017–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geier, D.L. (2004) Rheological investigation of bentonite based suspensions for geotechnical applications. M.S. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Goh, R., Leong, Y.K., and Lehane, B. (2011) Bentonite slurries-zeta potential, yield stress, adsorbed additive and time-dependent behaviour. Rheologica Acta, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  10. Gonzalez, J.L. and Martin-Vivaldi, J.L. (1963) Rheology of bentonite suspensions as drilling muds. Proceedings of a Conference held at Stockholm, Sweden, August 12–16, 1963, 2, p. 277, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Haldavnekar, V., Bobet, A., Santagata, M., and Drnevich, V. (2003) Soil treatment with a thixotropic fluid: an autoadaptive design for liquefaction prevention. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering and 3rd Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. II, pp. 553–560.Google Scholar
  12. Kelessidis, V. C., Tsamantaki, C., and Dalamarinis, P. (2007) Effect of pH and electrolyte on the rheology of aqueous Wyoming bentonite dispersions. Applied Clay Science, 38, 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kramer, S.L. (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Leong, Y.K. (1988) Rheology of modified and unmodified Victorian brown coal suspensions. PhD thesis, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Luckham, P.F. and Rossi, S. (1999) The colloidal and rheological properties of bentonite suspensions. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 82, 43–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lutz, J.F. (1939) The effect of iron on some physico-chemical properties of bentonite suspensions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 3, 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Madsen, F.T. and Müller-Vonmoos, M. (1989) The swelling behavior of clays. Applied Clay Science, 4, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitchell, J.K. (1993) Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  19. Morris, G.E. and Zbik, M.S. (2009) Smectite suspension structural behavior. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 93, 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nguyen, Q.D. and Boger, D.V. (1985) Thixotropic behaviour of concentrated bauxite residue suspensions. Rheologica Acta, 24, 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Norrish, K. (1954) The swelling of montmorillonite. Discussions of the Faraday Society, 18, 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Penner, D. and Lagaly, G. (2001) Influence of anions on the rheological properties of clay mineral dispersions. Applied Clay Science, 19, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Polito, C.P. and Martin II, J.R. (2003) A reconciliation of the effects of non-plastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands reported in the literature. Earthquake Spectra. 19, 635–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tchillingarian, G. (1952) Study of the dispersing agents. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 22, 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. van Olphen, H. (1977) An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Weiss, A. and Frank, R. (1961) Uber den Bau der Gerüste in thixotropen Gelen. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 16, 141–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yoon, J. (2011) Application of pore fluid engineering for improving the hydraulic performance of granular soils. Ph.D. dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Yoon, J.S. and El Mohtar, C. S. (2012) Time-dependent rheological behavior of modified bentonite suspensions. Proceedings of GeoCongress 2012, 1195–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fugro Consultants, Inc.HoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental EngineeringThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations