Advertisement

Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 431–448 | Cite as

Application of Box—Behnken Design to Modeling the Effect of Smectite Content on Swelling to Hydrocyclone Processing of Bentonites with Various Geologic Properties

  • Selçuk ÖzgenEmail author
  • Ahmet Yildiz
Article

Abstract

As advances in technology have led to increased use of bentonites, more high-quality bentonite has been sought. The volume of high-quality bentonites available is shrinking and use of bentonite reserves containing impurities is inevitable. The aim of this study was to apply Box–Behnken experimental design and response surface methodology to model and optimize some operational parameters of a hydrocyclone to produce three groups of bentonite concentrates. The four significant operational parameters of hydrocyclones are feed solid ratio, inlet pressure, vortex diameter, and apex diameter, and these parameters were varied and the results evaluated using the Box–Behnken factorial design. In order to produce bentonite concentrates using a hydrocyclone, mathematical model equations were derived by computer simulation programming applying a least-squares method, using Minitab 15. Second-order response functions were produced for the swelling and to establish the quantity of smectite in the bentonite concentrates. Predicted values were found to be in good agreement with the experimental values (R2 values of between 0.829 and 0.999 for smectite and three different swelling groups for the bentonites). Although in natural states these bentonites are not suitable for industrial use, enhancements were obtained giving up to 81.45% smectite and by increasing swelling by 194% for the three bentonite groups. The swelling properties of the bentonites are improved by increasing the proportion of smectite content. The graphics were designed to relate swelling and smectite content according to the two-dimensional hydrocyclone factors, and each factor was evaluated in itself. The present study revealed that the Box–Behnken and response surface methodology can be applied efficiently to model the hydrocyclone for bentonite; the method is economical and provides the maximum amount of information in a short period of time and with the smallest numberof experiments.

Key Words

Bentonite Box—Behnken Design Clay Minerals Hydrocyclone Modeling Process Optimization Response Surface Methodology Optimization Smectite Swelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J.M. (1987) Synthetic organic chemistry using pillared cation exchanged and acid treated montmorillonite catalysis: a review. Applied Clay Science, 2, 309–342.Google Scholar
  2. Allo, W.A. and Murray, H.H. (2004) Mineralogy, chemistry and potential applications of a white bentonite in San Juan province. Applied Clay Science, 25, 237–243.Google Scholar
  3. Alther, G.R. (1986) The effect of the exchangeable cations on the physico-chemical properties of Wyoming bentonites. Applied Clay Science, 1, 273–284.Google Scholar
  4. Aslan, N. and Cebeci, Y. (2007) Application of Box—Behnken design and response surface methodology for modeling of some Turkish coals. Fuel, 86, 90–97.Google Scholar
  5. Aslan, N. (2007a) Application of response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design for modeling the influence of some operating variables of a Multi-Gravity Separator for coal cleaning. Fuel, 86, 769–776.Google Scholar
  6. Aslan, N. (2007b). Modeling and optimization of Multi-Gravity Separator to produce celestite concentrate. Powder Technology, 174, 127–133.Google Scholar
  7. ASTM D 5890-95. Standard test method for swell index of clay mineral component of geosynthetic clay liners. American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
  8. Barrer, R.M. (1989) Shape-selective sorbents based on clay minerals: a review. Clays and Clay Minerals, 37, 385–395.Google Scholar
  9. Biscaye, P.E. (1965) Mineralogy and sedimentation of recent deep sea clay in the Atlantic Ocean and adjacent seas and oceans. The Geological Society of America Bulletin, 76, 803–832.Google Scholar
  10. Box, G.E.P. and Behnken, D.W. (1960) Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics, 2, 455–475.Google Scholar
  11. Box, G.E.P. and Wilson, K.B. (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B13, 1–45.Google Scholar
  12. Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G., and Hunter, J.S. (1978) Statistics for Experimenters: an Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 653 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Boylu, F., Çinku, K., Çetinel, T., Erkan, İ., and Demirer, N. (2007) The separation effeciency of ReŞadiye Na-Bentonite by hyrdrocyclone. Pp. 12–14 in: XIII. National Clay Symposium (M. KuŞçu, O. Cengiz and E. Öener, editors), Isparta, Turkey.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, G. (1972) Montmorillonites. Pp. 143–206 in: X-ray Identification and Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals. Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, G. and Brindley, G.W. (1980) X-ray diffraction procedures for clay mineral identification. Pp 305–359 in: Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and their X-ray Identification (G.W. Brindley and G. Brown, editors). Monograph 5, Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
  16. Cebeci, Y. and Sönmez, I. (2006) Application of the Box—Wilson experimental design method for the spherical oil agglomeration of coal. Fuel, 85, 289–297.Google Scholar
  17. Christidis, G. and Scott, P.W. (1993) Laboratory evaluation of bentonites. Industrial Minerals, 311, 51–57.Google Scholar
  18. Christidis, G.E., Scott, P.W., and Dunham, A.C. (1997) Acid activation and bleaching capacity of bentonites from the islands of Milos and Chios Aegean, Greece. Applied Clay Science, 12, 329–374.Google Scholar
  19. Christidis, G. (1998) Physical and chemical properties of some bentonite deposits of Kimolos Island, Greece. Applied Clay Science, 13, 79–98.Google Scholar
  20. Chu, L.Y. and Luo, Q. (1994) Hydrocyclone with high sharpness of separation. Filtration and Separation, 31, 733–736.Google Scholar
  21. Chung, F. (1974) Quantitative interpretation of X-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. I. Matrix flushing method for quantitative multicomponent analysis. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 7, 519–525.Google Scholar
  22. Correia, S.L., Curto, K.A.S., Hotza, D., and Segadaes, A.M. (2004) Using statistical techniques to model the flexural strength of dried triaxial ceramic bodies. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 24, 2813–2818.Google Scholar
  23. Ferreira, S.L.C., Dos Santos, W.N.L., Quintella, C.M., Neto, B.B., and Boque-Sendra, J.M. (2004) Doehlert matrix: a chemometric toll for analytical chemistry — review. Talanta, 63, 1061–1067.Google Scholar
  24. Ge, Z., Li, D., and Pinnavaia, T.J (1994) Preparation of alumina-pillared montmorillonite with high thermal stability, regular microporosity and Lewis/Bronsted acidity. Microporous Materials, 3, 165–175.Google Scholar
  25. Grim, R.E. (1962) Applied Clay Mineralogy. International Series in Earth Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 421 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Grim, R.E. (1968) Clay Mineralogy. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 596 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Grim, R.E. and Giiven, N. (1978) Bentonites: Geology, Mineralogy, Properties and Uses. Developments in Sedimentology 24. Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 256 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Gunaraj, V. and Murugan, N. (1999) Application of response surface methodologies for predicting weld base quality in submerged arc welding of pipes. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 88, 266–275.Google Scholar
  29. Gündoğdu, M.N. (1982) Geological, mineralogical and geochemical investigation of the Bigadic Neogene volcanosedimentary basin. Ph.D. thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, 386 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Güven, N. and Pollastro, R.M. (1992) Clay—Water Interface and Its Rheological Implications, CMS Workshop Lectures, vol. 4. The Clay Mineral Society, Aurora, CO, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Habibian, M., Pazouki, M., Ghanaie, H., and Abbaspour-Sani, K. (2008) Application of hydrocyclone for removal of yeasts from alcohol fermentations broth. Chemical Engineering Journal, 138(1-3), 30–34.Google Scholar
  32. Hassan, M.S. and Abdel-Khalek, N.A. (1998) Beneficiation and applications of an Egyptian bentonite. Applied Clay Science, 13, 99–115.Google Scholar
  33. Johns, W.D., Grim, R.E., and Bradley, W.F. (1954) Quantitative estimations of clay minerals by diffraction methods. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 24, 242–251.Google Scholar
  34. Kahraman, S., Önal, M., Sarιkaya, Y., and Bozdoğan, I. (2005) Characterization of silica polymorphs in kaolins by X-ray diffraction before and after phosphoric acid digestion and thermal treatment. Analytica Chimica Acta, 552, 201–206.Google Scholar
  35. Kincl, M., Turk, S., and Vrecer, F. (2005) Application of experimental design methodology in development and optimization of drug release method. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 291, 39–49.Google Scholar
  36. Komadel, P., Bujdák, J., Madejová, J., Šucha, V., and Elsass, F. (1996) Effect of non-swelling layers on the dissolution of reduced-charge montmorillonite in hydrochloric acid. Clay Minerals, 31, 333–345.Google Scholar
  37. Komadel, P. (2003) Chemically modified smectites. Clay Minerals, 38, 127–138.Google Scholar
  38. Komine, H. and Ogata, N. (1994) Experimental study on swelling characteristics of compacted bentonite. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31, 478–490.Google Scholar
  39. Komine, H. and Ogata, S. (1996) Prediction for swelling characteristics of bentonite. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33, 11–21.Google Scholar
  40. Komine, H. and Ogata, S. (1999) Experimental study on swelling characteristics of sand-bentonite mixture for nuclear waste disposal. Soils and Foundations, 39, 83–97.Google Scholar
  41. Kwak, J.S. (2005) Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for geometric error in surface grinding process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45, 327–334.Google Scholar
  42. Lagaly, G. (1984) Clay—organic interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A311, 315–332.Google Scholar
  43. Low, P.F. (1979) Nature and properties of water in montmorillonite—water systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43, 651–658.Google Scholar
  44. Luckham, P.F. and Rossi, S. (1999) The colloidal and rheological properties of bentonite suspension. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 82, 43–92.Google Scholar
  45. Malfoy, C., Pantet, A., Monnet, P., and Righi, D. (2003) Effect of the nature of exchangeable cation and clay concentration on the rheological properties of smectite suspensions. Clays and Clay Minerals, 51, 656–663.Google Scholar
  46. Martinez, A.L., Uribe, A.S., Carrillo, F.R.P., Coreno, J.A., and Ortiz, J.C. (2003) Study of celestite flotation efficiency using sodium dodecyl sulfonate collector: factorial experiment and statistical analysis of data. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 70, 83–97.Google Scholar
  47. Massart, D.L., Vandeginste, B.G.M., Buydens, L.M.C., Jong, S., Lewi, P.J., and Smeyers Verbeke, J. (1997) Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics Part A. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 886 pp.Google Scholar
  48. Minitab Inc. (2007) Meet minitab 15. USA, 142 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Montes, G., Duplay, J., Martinez, L., Geraud, Y., and Rousset-Tournier, B. (2003) Influence of interlayer cations on the water sorption and swelling-shrinkage of MW80 bentonite. Applied Clay Science, 23, 309–321.Google Scholar
  50. Montgomery, D.C. (2001) Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 684 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Murray, H.H. (2000) Traditional and new applications for kaolin, smectite and polygorskite: a general overview. Applied Clay Science, 17, 207–221.Google Scholar
  52. Neaman, A., Pelletier, M., and Villieras, F. (2003) The effects of exchangeable cation, compression, heating and hydration on textural properties of bulk bentonite and its corresponding purified montmorillonite. Applied Clay Science, 22, 153–168.Google Scholar
  53. Neto, B.B., Scarminio, I.S., and Bruns, R.E. (2001) Como fazer Experimentos: Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento na Ciência e na Industria. Editora da Unicamp, São Paulo, 480 pp.Google Scholar
  54. Obeng, D.P., Morrell, S., and Napier-Munn, T.J. (2005) Application of central composite rotatable design to modeling the effect of some operating variables on the performance of the three-product cyclone. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 76, 181–192.Google Scholar
  55. Önal, M., Sarιkaya, Y., and Alemdaroğlu, T. (2002) The effect of acid activation on some physicochemical properties of a bentonite. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 26, 409–416.Google Scholar
  56. Önal, M. (2007) Swelling and cation exchange capacity relationship for the samples obtained from a bentonite by acid activations and heat treatments. Applied Clay Science, 37, 74–80.Google Scholar
  57. Özbayoğlu, G. and Atalay, M.U. (2000) Beneficiation of bastnaesite by a multigravity separator. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 303-304, 520–523.Google Scholar
  58. Özgen, S., Yιldιz, A., Çalιşkan, A., and Sabah, E. (2009) Modeling and optimization of hydrocyclone processing of low grade bentonites. Applied Clay Science, 46, 305–316.Google Scholar
  59. Pinnavaia, T.J. (1983) Intercalated clay catalysis. Science, 220, 365–371.Google Scholar
  60. Push, R. (1992) Use of bentonite for isolation of radioactive waste products. Clay Minerals, 27, 753–761.Google Scholar
  61. Ragonese, R., Macka, M., Hughes, J., and Petocz, P. (2002) The use of the Box-Behnken experimental design in the optimisation and robustness testing of a capillary electrophoresis method for the analysis of ethambutol hydrochloride in a pharmaceutical formulation. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 27, 995–1007.Google Scholar
  62. Rickwood, D., Onions, J., Bendixen, B., and Smyth, I. (1992) Prospects for the use of hydrocyclones for biological separations. Pp. 109–120 in: Hydrocyclones Analysis and Applications (L. Svaorovsky and M.T. Thew, editors). Kluwer Academic, London.Google Scholar
  63. Rytwo, G., Serben, C., Nir, S., and Margulies, L. (1991) Use of methylene blue and crystal violet for determination of exchangeable cations in montmorillonite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 39, 551–555.Google Scholar
  64. Sarikaya, Y., Önal, M., Baran, B., and Alemdaroğlu, T. (2000) The effect of thermal treatment on some of the physicochemical properties of a bentonite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 48, 557–562.Google Scholar
  65. Sharmm, L.L. and Kwak, J.C.T. (1982) Influence of exchangeable cation composition on the size and shape of montmorillonite particles in dilute suspension. Clays and Clay Minerals, 30, 40–48.Google Scholar
  66. Souzaa, A.S., dos Santos, W.N.L., and Sergio Ferreira, L.C. (2005) Application of Box—Behnken design in the optimization of an on-line pre-concentration system using knotted reactor for cadmium determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Spectrochimica Acta Part B, 60, 737–742.Google Scholar
  67. Tan, Ö., Yιlmaz, L., and Zaimoğlu, S. (2004) Variation of some engineering properties of clays with heat treatment. Materials Letters, 58, 1176–1179.Google Scholar
  68. Theng, B.K.G. (1974) The Chemistry of Clay Organic Reactions. Adam Hilger, London.Google Scholar
  69. Wersin, P., Curti, E., and Appelo, C.A.J. (2004) Modeling bentonite—water interactions at high solid/liquid ratios: swelling and diffuse double layer effects. Applied Clay Science, 26, 249–257.Google Scholar
  70. Williams, R.A., Albarran de Garcia Colon, I.L., Lee, M.S., and Roldan Villasana, E.J. (1994) Design Targeting of Hydrocyclone Networks. Minerals Engineering, 7, 561–576.Google Scholar
  71. Xiao, Z. and Vien, A. (2004) Experimental designs for precise parameter estimation for non-linear models. Minerals Engineering, 17, 431–436.Google Scholar
  72. Varma, R.S. (2002) Clay and clay-supported reagents in organic synthesis. Tetrahedron, 58, 1235–1255.Google Scholar
  73. Yιldιz, A., Kibici, Y., Çoban, F., Bağcι, M., Dumlupunar, İ., Kocabaş, C., Arιtan, E., and Bilge Y. (2008) The investigation of the geological properties of Mihalgazi (Eskişehir) bentonite and evaluation of bentonite as industrial raw material. The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) Project No: 104Y160 Technical Report, Turkey.Google Scholar
  74. Yιldιz, A. and Kuİcu, M. (2007) Mineralogy, chemistry and physical properties of bentonites from Baİören, Kütahya, W-Anatolia. Clay Minerals, 42, 403–418.Google Scholar
  75. Yong, R.N. (1999) Soil suction and soil—water potential in swelling clays in engineered clay barriers. Engineering Geology, 54, 3–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining EngineeringAfyon Kocatepe UniversityAfyonkarahisarTurkey

Personalised recommendations