Quantitative phase analysis of bentonites by the rietveld method
Thirty six bentonite samples from 16 different locations were examined in order to demonstrate the applicability of a new Rietveld description approach for quantitative phase analysis. X-ray diffraction patterns of the bulk material were obtained and analyzed by the Rietveld method. The samples contain up to ten different minerals, with dioctahedral smectite as the major component. A model for turbostratic disorder of smectites was formulated inside a structure-description file of the Rietveld program BGMN. The quality of the refinements was checked using an internal standard mineral (10.0 or 20.0 wt.% corundum) and by cross-checking results with X-ray fluorescence (XRF) data. The corundum content was reproduced with only small deviations from the nominal values. A comparison of the chemical composition obtained by XRF and the composition as re-calculated from quantitative Rietveld results shows a satisfactory agreement, although X-ray amorphous components such as volcanic glasses were not considered. As a result of this study, the Rietveld method combined with the new structure model for turbostratic disorder has proven to be a suitable method for routine quantitative analysis of bentonites with smectites as the dominant clay minerals.
Key WordsBentonite Quantification Rietveld Analysis Smectite
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bergmann, J., Friedel, P., and Kleeberg, R. (1998) BGMN — a new fundamental parameter based Rietveld program for laboratory X-ray sources, its use in quantitative analysis and structure investigations. Commission of Powder Diffraction. International Union of Crystallography, CPD Newsletter, 20, 5–8.Google Scholar
- Bish, D.L. and Post, J.E. (1993) Quantitative mineralogical analysis using the Rietveld full-pattern fitting method. American Mineralogist, 78, 932–940.Google Scholar
- Herrmann, W. and Berry, R.F. (2002) MINSQ — a least squares spreadsheet method for calculating mineral proportions from whole rock major element analyses. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 2, 361–368.Google Scholar
- Kahr, G. (1998) Methoden zur Bestimmung des Smektitgehaltes von Bentoniten. Pp. 163–172 in: Berichte der DTTG (K.-H. Henning and J. Kasbohm, editors). DTTG, Greifswald, Germany.Google Scholar
- Kahr, G. and Meier, L.P. (1996) Einfache Bestimmungsmethode des Kationenaustauschvermögens von Tonen mit Komplexverbindungen des Kupfer(II)-Ions mit Triethylentetramin und Tetraethylenpentamin. Pp. 122–126 in: Berichte der DTTG (D. Wolf, R. Starke and R. Kleeberg, editors). DTTG, Freiberg, Germany.Google Scholar
- Kleeberg, R. (2004) Results of the second Reynolds Cup contest in quantitative mineral analysis. Commission of Powder Diffraction, International Union of Crystallography CPD Newsletter, 30, 22–24.Google Scholar
- Monecke, T., Köhler, S., Kleeberg, R., Herzig, P., and Gemmell, J.B. (2001) Quantitative phase-analysis by the Rietveld method using X-ray powder-diffraction data: Application to the study of alteration halos associated with volcanic-rock-hosted massive sulfide deposits. The Canadian Mineralogist, 39, 1617–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moore, D.M. and Reynolds, R.C., Jr. (1997) X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press, New York, 332 pp.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, R.C. (1989) Principles and techniques of quantitative analysis of clay minerals by X-ray powder diffraction. Pp. 437 in: Quantitative Mineral Analysis of Clays (D.R. Pevearand F.A. Mumpton, editors). CMS Workshop lectures, 1, The Clay Minerals Society, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
- Ufer, K., Roth, G., Kleeberg, R., Stanjek, H., Dohrmann, R. and Bergmann, J. (2004) Description of X-ray powder pattern of turbostratically disordered layer structures with a Rietveld compatible approach. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 219, 519–527.Google Scholar