Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 867–880 | Cite as

Effects of Exchanged Cation and Layer Charge on the Sorption of Water and Egme Vapors on Montmorillonite Clays

  • Cary T. Chiou
  • David W. Rutherford


The effects of exchanged cation and layer charge on the sorption of water and ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) vapors on montmorillonite have been studied on SAz-1 and SWy-1 source clays, each exchanged respectively with Ca, Na, K, Cs and tetramethylammonium (TMA) cations. The corresponding lattice expansions were also determined, and the corresponding N2 adsorption data were provided for comparison. For clays exchanged with cations of low hydrating powers (such as K, Cs and TMA), water shows a notably lower uptake than does N2 at low relative pressures (P/P0). By contrast, EGME shows higher uptakes than N2 on all exchanged clays at all P/P0. The anomaly for water is attributed to its relatively low attraction for siloxane surfaces of montmorillonite because of its high cohesive energy density. In addition to solvating cations and expanding interlayers, water and EGME vapors condense into small clay pores and interlayer voids created by interlayer expansion. The initial (dry) interlayer separation varies more significantly with cation type than with layer charge; the water-saturated interlayer separation varies more with cation type than the EGME-saturated interlayer separation. Because of the differences in surface adsorption and interlayer expansion for water and EGME, no general correspondence is found between the isotherms of water and EGME on exchanged clays, nor is a simple relation observed between the overall uptake of either vapor and the cation solvating power. The excess interlayer capacities of water and of EGME that result from lattice expansion of the exchanged clays are estimated by correcting for amounts of vapor adsorption on planar clay surfaces and of vapor condensation into intrinsic clay pores. The resulting data follow more closely the relative solvating powers of the exchanged cations.

Key Words

Cation Solvation EGME Isotherms Excess Interlayer Uptake Exchanged Cation Interlayer Spacings Layer Charge Layer Separation Microporosity Montmorillonite Surface Adsorption Water Isotherms 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carter DL, Heilman MD, Gonzalez CL. 1965. Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether for determining surface area of silicate minerals. Soil Sci 100:356–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen NY. 1976. Hydrophobic properties of zeolites. J Phys Chem 80:60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiou CT, Rutherford DW, Manes M. 1993. Sorption of N2 and EGME vapors on some soils, clays, and mineral oxides and determination of sample surface areas by use of sorption data. Environ Sci Technol 27:1587–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Boer JH, Lippens BC, Linsen BG, Broekhoff JCP, van den Heuvel A, Osinga Th J. 1966. The t-curve of multilayer N2-adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 21:405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doner HE, Mortland MM. 1969. Benzene complexes with Cu-montmorillonite. Science 166:1406–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fu MH, Zhang ZZ, Low PE 1990. Changes in the properties of a montmorillonite-water system during the adsorption and desorption of water hysteresis. Clays Clay Miner 38: 485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hendricks SB, Nelson RA, Alexander LT. 1940. Hydration mechanism of the clay montmorillonite with various cations. J Am Chem Soc 62:1457–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keren R, Shainberg I. 1975. Water vapor isotherms and heat of immersion of Na/Ca-montmorillonite systems—I: homoionic clay. Clays Clay Miner 23:193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kittrick JA. 1969. Interlayer forces in montmorillonite and vermiculite. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 33:217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McNeal BL. 1964. Effect of exchangeable cations on glycol retention by clay minerals. Soil Sci 97:96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mooney RW, Keenan AG, Wood LA. 1952a. Adsorption of water vapor by montmorillonite. I. Heat of desorption and application of BET theory. J Am Chem Soc 74:1367–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mooney RW, Keenan AG, Wood LA. 1952b. Adsorption of water vapor by montmorillonite. II. Effect of exchangeable ions and lattice swelling as measured by X-ray diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 74:1371–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mortland MM, Halloran LJ. 1976. Polymerization of aromatic molecules on smectite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:367–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parker JC. 1986. Hydrostatics of water in porous media. In: Sparks DL, editor. Soil physical chemistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Pr. p 209–296.Google Scholar
  15. Pinnavaia TJ, Hall PL, Cady SS, Mortland MM. 1974. Aromatic radical cation formation on the intracrystal surfaces of transition metal layer lattice silicates. J Phys Chem 78: 994–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Quirk JP. 1955. Significance of surface areas calculated from water vapor sorption isotherms by use of the B.E.T. equation. Soil Sci 80:423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rutherford, DW, Chiou CT, Eberl DD. 1997. Effects of exchanged cation on the microporosity of montmorillonite. Clays Clay Miner 45:534–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skipper NT, Refson K, McConnell JDC. 1989. Computer calculation of water-clay interactions using atomic pair potentials. Clay Miner 24:411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van Olphen H, Fripiat JJ. 1979. Data handbook for clay minerals and other nonmetallic minerals. New York: Pergamon Pr. 346 p.Google Scholar
  20. Wohleber DA, Manes M. 1971. Application of the Polanyi adsorption potential theory to adsorption from solution on activated carbon. II. Adsorption of partially miscible liquids from water solution. J Phys Chem 75:61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cary T. Chiou
    • 1
  • David W. Rutherford
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyDenver Federal CenterDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations