Advertisement

Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 791–800 | Cite as

Characterization of Soil Clay Minerals: Decomposition of X-Ray Diffraction Diagrams and High-Resolution Electron Microscopy

  • Dominique Righi
  • Françoise Elsass
Article

Abstract

Fine clays (<0.1 μm) extracted from an acid soil developed in a granite saprolite from the Massif Central, France, were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a curve decomposition program, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) associated with a method of impregnation of moist samples. Direct measurement of d-spacings were performed on HRTEM photographs. Decomposition of XRD patterns indicated 5 to 6 different clay phases including chlorite (and/or hydroxy-interlayered vermiculite), vermiculite/smectite, illite/vermiculite and illite/smectite mixed layers. Expandable phases with decreasing layer charge (vermiculite, high- and low-charge smectite) were shown in the clay assemblage. When performed on K-saturated samples subjected to wetting and drying cycles, HRTEM observations were consistent with the XRD results. The major clay mineral phases identified by the decomposition of XRD patterns were also found by direct measurement of d-spacings on HRTEM images. Vermiculite and high-charge smectite appeared to be impregnated with preservation of their initial hydration state, whereas low-charge smectite interlayers were penetrated by the resin molecules during the impregnation procedure. It was concluded that the decomposition of XRD patterns gave a realistic analysis of the clay phases present in a complex soil clay sample, as well as the direct measurement of a limited number (50) of clay crystals on HRTEM images.

Key Words

Acid Soil Decomposition of X-ray Patterns High-Charge Smectite High-Resolution Electron Microscopy Illite/Smectite Mixed Layers Illite/Vermiculite Mixed Layers Low-Charge Smectite Soil Clays X-ray Diffraction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson SJ, Sposito G. 1991. Cesium-adsorption method for measuring accessible structural surface charge. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1569–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoudjit H, Robert M, Elsass F, Curmi P. 1995. Detailed study of smectite genesis in granite saprolites by analytical electron microscopy. Clay Miner 30:135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elsass F, Robert M. 1992. Application of high resolution electron microscopy to soil clay origin and organization in a temperate climate. Geologica Carpathica Ser Clays 2:55–61.Google Scholar
  4. INRA 1992. Référentiel Pédologique. Principaux sols d’Europe. Paris: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA). 222 p.Google Scholar
  5. Jeanroy E. 1972. Analyse totale des silicates naturels par spectrophotometrie d’absorption atomique. Application au sol et à ses constituants. Chim Anal 54:159–166.Google Scholar
  6. Kim J-W, Peacor DR, Tessier D, Elsass F. 1995. A technique for maintaining texture and permanent expansion of smectite interlayers for TEM observations. Clays Clay Miner 43:51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lanson B. 1990. Mise en évidence des mécanismes de transformation des interstratifiés illite/smectite au cours de la diagenése [thesis]. Paris: Univ of Paris VI. 366 p.Google Scholar
  8. Lanson B. 1993. Decompxr, X-ray diffraction pattern decomposition program. Poitiers, France: ERM. 48 p.Google Scholar
  9. Lanson B, Besson G. 1992. Characterization of the end of smectite-to-illite transformation: decomposition of the X-ray patterns. Clays Clay Miner 40:40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lanson B, Velde B. 1992. Decomposition of X-ray diffraction patterns: a convenient way to describe complex I/S diagenetic evolution. Clays Clay Miner 40:629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Malla PB, Douglas LA. 1987. Identification of expanding layer silicates: layer charge vs. expansion properties. In: Schultz LG, van Olphen H, Mumpton FA, editors. Proceedings of the International Clay Conference; 1985; Denver. Bloomington, Indiana: The Clay Minerals Society, p 227–283.Google Scholar
  12. Reynolds RC. 1985. Description of program NEWMOD for the calculation of the one-dimensional X-ray diffraction patterns of mixed-layered Clays. Hanover, New Hampshire: Reynolds RC, 8 Brook Road. 24 p.Google Scholar
  13. Righi D, Meunier A. 1991. Characterization and genetic interpretation of clays in an acid brown soil (Dystrochrept) developed in a granitic saprolite. Clays Clay Miner 39: 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Righi D, Petit S, Bouchet A. 1993. Characterization of hydroxy-interlayered vermiculite and illite/smectite interstratified minerals from the weathering of chlorite in a Cryorthod. Clays Clay Miner 41:484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Romero R, Robert M, Elsass F, Garcia C. 1992. Abundance of halloysite in soils developed from crystalline rocks. Contribution of transmission microscopy. Clay Miner 39:137–141.Google Scholar
  16. Środoń J, Andreoli C, Elsass F, Robert M. 1990. Direct highresolution transmission electron microscopic measurement of expandability of mixed-layer illite/smectite in bentonite rock. Clays Clay Miner 38:373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tessier D. 1984. Etude expérimentale de l’organisation des matériaux argileux [thesis]. Paris: Univ of Paris VII. Versailles, France: INRA. 361 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominique Righi
    • 1
  • Françoise Elsass
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculté des SciencesURA 721 CNRS “Argiles, Sols et Altérations”Poitiers CedexFrance
  2. 2.Station de Science du SolINRAVersailles CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations