Advertisement

Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 191–196 | Cite as

Why Does Halloysite Roll?—A New Model

  • Balbir Singh
Article

Abstract

A model is presented to explain why tubular halloysite rolls in preference to tetrahedral rotation to correct misfit of the octahedral and tetrahedral sheets. It is shown that the rolling mechanism operates as it encounters significantly less resistance from Si-Si repulsion in comparison to tetrahedral rotation to correct the same amount of misfit. The model explains the observed and experimental rolling of planar kaolinites to form tubular halloysite upon hydration and exfoliation.

Key Words

Coulomb repulsion Kaolinite Rolling Tetrahedral rotation Tubular Halloysite 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey SW. 1980. Kaolin minerals. In:Brindley GW, Brown G, editors. Crystal structures of clay minerals and their X-ray identification. London: Mineralogical Society. 1–123.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey SW. 1988. Polytypism of 1:1 layer silicate. In: Bailey SW, editor. Hydrous phyllosilicates (exclusive of mica). MSA Reviews in Mineralogy 19:9–27.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey SW. 1989. Halloysite—A critical assessment. In: Farmer VC, Tardy Y, editors. Proc. Int. Clay Conf. Strasbourg, France. Sci Geol Mem 86:89–98.Google Scholar
  4. Banfield JF, Eggleton RA. 1990. Analytical transmission electron microscope studies of plagioclase, muscovite, and K-feldspar weathering. Clays & Clay Miner 38:77–89.Google Scholar
  5. Bates TF, Hildebrand FA, Swineford A. 1950. Morphology and structure of endellite and halloysite. Am Mineral 6:237–248.Google Scholar
  6. Churchman GJ, Gilkes RJ. 1989. Recognition of intermediates in the possible transformation of halloysite to kaolinite in weathering profiles. Clay Miner 24:579–590.Google Scholar
  7. Costanzo PM, Giese Jr RE 1985. Dehydration of synthetic hydrated kaolinite: a model for dehydration of halloysite (10Å). Clays & Clay Miner 33:415–423.Google Scholar
  8. Giese Jr RE 1988. Kaolin minerals: Structures and stablities. In:Bailey SW, editor. Hydrous phyllosilicates (exclusive of micas). MSA Reviews in Mineralogy 19:29–66.Google Scholar
  9. Newman R, Childs C, Churchman J. 1994. Aluminium coordination and structural disorder in halloysite and kaolinite by 27Al NMR spectroscopy. Clays & Clay Miner 29:305–312.Google Scholar
  10. Radoslovich EW. 1963a. The cell dimensions and symmetry of layer-lattice silicate. IV. Inter atomic forces. Am Mineral 48:76–99.Google Scholar
  11. Radoslovich EW. 1963b. The cell dimensions and symmetry of layer-lattice silicate. VI. Serpentine and kaolin morphology. Am Mineral 48:368–378.Google Scholar
  12. Robertson IDM, Eggleton RA. 1991. Weathering of granitic muscovite to kaolinite and halloysite and of plagioclase-derived kaolinite to halloysite. Clays & Clay Miner 39: 113–126.Google Scholar
  13. Singh Balbir, Gilkes RJ. 1991. Weathering of chromian muscovite to kaolinite. Clays & Clay Miner 39:571–579.Google Scholar
  14. Singh Balbir, Gilkes RJ. 1992. An electron-optical investigation of the alteration of kaolinite to halloysite. Clays & Clay Miner 40:212–229.Google Scholar
  15. Singh Balbir, Mackinnon IDR. personal communication. Center for Microscopy and Microanalysis. The University of Queensland. Brisbane, Qld. 4072, Australia.Google Scholar
  16. Tazaki K. 1982. Analytical electron microscopic studies of halloysite formation- morphology and composition of halloysite. Proc. 7th Int. Clay Conf., Italy 573–584.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Balbir Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Microscopy and MicroanalysisThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations