Advertisement

Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 316–323 | Cite as

Discrimination of Kaolinite Varieties in Porters Creek and Wilcox Sediments of North-Central Mississippi

  • William R. Reynolds
Article

Abstract

Use of a discriminant analysis has verified and grouped three suspected varieties of kaolinite found in kaolin-rich clay strata of late Paleocene to early Eocene age across north-central Mississippi. Initial identification of each type of kaolinite was based on clay-texture characteristics observed on scanning electron micrographs and the differences in pattern configurations of X-ray diffractograms. The discriminant function used for data treatment clearly segregated and grouped each variety. The discrimination variables were found to be the Hinckley index and, to a lesser extent, the Si4+ content relative to the Al3+ content.

The oldest variety is the Blue Mountain clay, composed of preserved hexagonal plates usually clustered into booklets with a vermiform texture. The Ashland variety, stratigraphically younger than the Blue Mountain clay, appears to have been derived from the erosion of the Blue Mountain clay. The Ashland cannot be recognized by any type of diagnostic texture, as it is made up of individual plates that have been corroded and abraded to the point where a hexagonal outline can no longer be recognized. The Sardis variety is the stratigraphically youngest of the three varieties and is at least a second, or possibly a third generation detrital product. The Sardis clay can be recognized by a distinct “ribbon” or “swirl” texture commonly found in ball clays.

Data from this study are not sufficient for complete petrogenetic interpretation. However, speculation on possible differences in depositional environments and modes of deposition can be based on the data at hand. The Blue Mountain variety is considered from previous studies to be primary. The Ashland variety is probably a first generation alluvial clay. The Sardis variety appears to be a multiple generation, detrital product that accumulated as part of overbank swamp deposits.

Key Words

Kaolinite Discriminant analysis Scanning electron microscopy Hinckley index Ball clay Clay deposition. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, V. T. (1952) Petrographic relations in some bauxite and diaspore deposits: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 63, 649–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burchard, E. F. (1924) Bauxite associated with siderite: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 35, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burchard, E. F. (1925) Bauxite in northeastern Mississippi. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 750, 101–146.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, W. J. (1979) Interfluvial model for the upper Freeport coal seam in parts of West Virginia: M.S. thesis, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, 53 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Conant, L. C. (1941) Tippah County mineral resources. Geology: Mississippi Bur. Geol. Bull. 42, 101–146.Google Scholar
  6. Conant, L. C. (1965) Bauxite and kaolin deposits of Mississippi exclusive of the Tippah-Benton District: U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1199-B, 70 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Cooley, W. W. and Lohnes, P. R. (1985) Multivariate Data Analysis: Robert E. Krieger Publ. Co., Malabar, Florida, 364 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Curtis, C. D. and Spears, D. A. (1971) Diagenetic development of kaolinite: Clays & Clay Minerals 19, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dillon, W. R. and Goldstein, M. (1984) Multivariate Analysis, Methods and Applications: Wiley, New York, 587 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Duplantis, M. J. (1975) Depositional systems in the Midway and Wilcox Groups, Mississippi: M.S. thesis, The University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, 82 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Griffin, G. M. and Parrott, B. S. (1964) Development of clay mineral zones during deltaic migration: Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 48, 57–59.Google Scholar
  12. Hinckley, D. N. (1963) Variability in “crystallinity” values among the kaolin deposits of the coastal plain of Georgia and South Carolina: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 11th Natl. Conf, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 1962, Ada Swine-ford, ed., Pergamon Press, New York, 229–235.Google Scholar
  13. Kachigan, S. K. (1986) Statistical Analysis: Radius Press, New York, 357–375.Google Scholar
  14. Keller, W. D. (1976a) Scan electron micrographs of kaolins collected from diverse environments of origin—I: Clays & Clay Minerals 24, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keller, W. D. (1976b) Scan electron micrographs of kaolins collected from diverse environments of origin—II: Clays & Clay Minerals 24, 114–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keller, W. D. (1976c) Scan electron micrographs of kaolins collected from diverse origins—III. Influence of parent material on flint clays and flint-like clays: Clays & Clay Minerals 24, 262–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keller, W. D. (1977) Kaolins collected from diverse environments of origin—IV. Georgia kaolin and kaolinizing source rocks: Clays & Clay Minerals 25, 311–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keller, W. D. and Stevens, R. P. (1983) Physical arrangement of high-alumina clay types in a Missouri clay deposit and implications for their genesis: Clays & Clay Minerals 31, 422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lusk, T.W. (1956) Benton County geology: Mississippi Bur. Geol. Bull. 80, 104 pp.Google Scholar
  20. MacNeil, F. S. (1951) Fern Spring Member of the Wilcox Formation in Mississippi: Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 35, 1062–1063.Google Scholar
  21. Mellon, F. F. (1939) Winston County mineral resources: Mississippi Bur. Geol. Bull. 38, 169 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Patterson, S. H. and Murray, H. H. (1975) Clays: in Industrial Minerals and Rocks, 4th ed., S. J. Lefond, ed., American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., New York, 1360 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Priddy, R. R. (1943) Pontotoc County mineral resources; Geology: Mississippi Bur. Geol. Bull. 54, 5–88.Google Scholar
  24. Raybon, S. O. (1982) Lithology and clay mineral variation in the middle phase of the Paleocene Porters Creek Formation of Mississippi: M.S. thesis, The University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, 101 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Reed, D. F. (1948) Bauxite deposits of Tippah and Benton Counties, Mississippi: U.S. Bur. Mines Rept. Inv. 4281, 15 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Reed, D. F. (1952) Investigation of high aluminum clays and bauxite of northeastern Mississippi: U.S. Bur. Mines Rept. Inv. 4827, 84 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Smoot, T. W. (1960) Clay mineralogy of Pre-Pennsylvanian shale of Illinois Basin: Illinois Geol. Surv. Cir. 293, 19 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Snowden, J. O. and Forsthoff, G. M. (1976) Clay sedimentation in the Pearl River delta, Louisiana-Mississippi: Trans. Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc. 24, 298–304.Google Scholar
  29. Thompson, C. N. (1981) Petrology of north Mississippi bauxite; A case for depositional bauxite and kaolin: M.S. thesis, The University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, 155 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Tourtelot, H. A. (1964) Bauxite deposits of the Tippah-Benton District Mississippi: U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1199-C, 33 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Valeton, I. (1972) Bauxites, Developments in Soil Science 1: Elsevier, New York, 226 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Whittig, L. D. (1965) X-ray diffraction techniques for mineral identification and mineralogical composition: in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I, C. A. Black, D. D. Evans, J. L. White, L. E. Ensminger, and F. E. Clark, eds., Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin, 671–698.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, E. G. and Berbenback, R. E. (1968) Origin of some Pennsylvanian underclays in western Pennsylvania: J. Sed. Petr. 39, 1179–1193.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • William R. Reynolds
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geology and Geological EngineeringThe University of MississippiUniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations