Effects of Relative Humidity on the Basal Expansion of Mg-Smectite Equilibrated with Ethylene Glycol at Low Vapor Pressure
The effects of relative humidity (RH) on the expansion of Mg-smectite, equilibrated with low vapor pressure of ethylene glycol (EG), was studied. Four smectite samples were equilibrated with EG vapor from: (1) saturated vapor of pure EG, (2) an EG-CaCl2 solvate, and (3) 0.05 relative EG vapor pressure at 65°C. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analyses of the clays under different RH conditions indicated that without EG, the basal spacing of Mg-smectite samples could only be expanded to 16 Å, even at 0.97 RH. The basal spacing of Mg-smectite samples equilibrated with saturated EG vapor was expanded to 17.1 Å and was not significantly affected by RH in the range 0.1–0.9. The basal spacing of the Mg-smectite samples equilibrated with vapor from the EG-CaCl2 solvate and 0.05 relative EG pressure at 65°C was expanded by an amount that depended on the RH during the XRD analysis. The basal spacing increased from 14.2 to 17.1 Å as the RH increased from 0.6 to 0.75, except for sample API 23, which expanded to 17.1 Å at RH > 0.9. This sample did not expand beyond 16 Å when it was equilibrated with 0.05 EG relative vapor pressure. Sorption of moisture from air caused the one-layer EG-Mg-smectite complex (basal spacing = 14.1 Å) to rearrange itself to a double-layer EG-Mg-smectite complex (basal spacing = 17.1 Å). A small amount of the adsorbed EG in Mg-smectite, much less than was needed to cover a one-layer of the interlayer surfaces, caused an expansion of the basal spacing to 17.1 Å at high RH during the XRD analysis. The minimum amount of adsorbed EG which caused the one-/two-layer EG complex conversion was about 20–30 mg EG/g. The conversion was fast (<5 min) and was relatively reversible.
Key WordsBasal expansion Ethylene glycol Relative humidity Smectite X-ray powder expansion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boublick, T., Fried, V, and Hala, E. (1973) The Vapor Pressure of Pure Substances: Elsevier, New York, p. 98.Google Scholar
- Jackson, M. L. (1969) Soil Chemical Analysis–Advanced Course: Published by the author, Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin Madison, 127–141.Google Scholar
- Kunze, G. W. (1955) Anomalies in the ethylene glycol solvation technique used in X-ray diffraction: in Clay and Clay Minerals, Proc. 3rd. Natl. Conf., Houston, Texas, 1954, W. O. Mulligen, ed., Natl. Acad. Sci. Natl. Res. Counc. Publ. 395, 88–93.Google Scholar