Advertisement

Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 131–143 | Cite as

Mineralogy and Origin of the Coalinga Asbestos Deposit

  • F. A. Mumpton
  • C. S. Thompson
Article

Abstract

Since 1960 asbestos production of the United States has more than tripled, a phenomenon due in large part to the development of the Coalinga asbestos deposit in western California. Although most asbestos ores contain 5–10 per cent chrysotile in the form of cross- or slip-fiber veins within massive serpentinite bodies, no such veins are to be found in the Coalinga deposit despite the fact that it contains more than 50 per cent recoverable chrysotile. The Coalinga ore consists of soft, powdery, pellet-like agglomerates of finely matted chrysotile surrounding blocks and fragments of serpentinite rock. The highly sheared and pulverized nature of the ore favors its exploitation by simple, open-pit mining, and high quality products can be prepared by either wet or dry milling processes.

Four types of serpentine material are distinguishable: (1) hard, dense blocks of serpentinite rock, ranging from fractions of an inch to several tens of feet in diameter; (2) tough, leathery sheets, resembling mountain leather, up to several square feet in size; (3) brittle blades and plates of green serpentine, a few square inches in size; and (4) friable agglomerates of soft, powdery chrysotile containing appreciable amounts of the other three. Chrysotile is the principal component of all the above materials, with the exception of the serpentinite rock which consists mainly of lizardite and/or antigorite, with small amounts of brucite, magnetite, and very short fiber chrysotile. Although chrysotile fibers up to several microns in length are present in the leathery sheets, most Coalinga chrysotile is much shorter and arranged in a swirling mesh or disoriented, tangled fibers, much like cellulose fibers in paper. Fragments of serpentinite gangue are scattered throughout the ore and contain most of the lizardite, antigorite, and brucite. Chemical, electron probe, and X-ray analyses confirm the iron-rich nature of the brucite, a critical factor in the susceptibility of this phase to oxidation in the surface weathering zone. Here brucite either dissolves, leaving behind a residue of brown, amorphous iron oxides, or transforms in situ to pyroaurite or coalingite. Dissolved magnesium precipitates as hydromagnesite immediately above the water table throughout the deposit.

The abnormally high chrysotile content of this deposit is probably a result of the intensive shearing that it underwent during or after emplacement. If the friable, chrysotile-rich ore was produced during this pulverization episode, (1) lizardite and/or antigorite in the serpentinite must have been transformed into chrysotile and (2) brucite must have been removed. It is likely that early-formed lizardite/antigorite dissolved in the ground waters which pervaded the highly sheared body and that chrysotile later precipitated from these waters, coating all available surfaces.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous (1957) Proposed wildlife withdrawal—asbestos: Mineral Infor. Serv., Cal. Div. Mines 10, 6.Google Scholar
  2. Barbaras, G. D. (1953) Aqueous asbestos dispersion and process for producing same: U.S. Patent 2, 611, 287.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, I, La Marche, V. C, Jr. and Himmelberg, G. (1967) Geochemical evidence of present day serpentinization: Science 156, 830–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, I. and O’Neil, J. R. (1969) The relationship between fluids in some fresh alpine-type ultramafics and possible modern serpentinization, Western United States: Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 80, 1947–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen, N. L. and Tuttle, O. F. (1949) The system MgO-SiO2-H2O: Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 60, 439–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bright, J. H. (October 31, 1959) Report of 1959 exploration program, Condor asbestos properties, Fresno and San Benito Counties, California: Union Carbide Nuclear Company Report.Google Scholar
  7. Brindley, G. W. and Zussman, J. (1959) Infrared absorption data for serpentine minerals: Am. Miner. 44, 185–8.Google Scholar
  8. Byerly, P. E. (1954) Regional gravity in the central Coast Ranges and the San Joaquin Valley, California: Ph.D. thesis, Harvard Univ.Google Scholar
  9. Cady, W. M, Albee, A. L. and Chidester, A. H. (1963) Bedrock geology and asbestos deposits of Missisquoi Valley and vicinity, Vermont: U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1122B, 1–78.Google Scholar
  10. Chidester, A. H. (1962) Petrology and geochemistry of selected talc-bearing ultramafic rocks and adjacent country rocks in north-central Vermont: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 345, 207.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, R. G. (1957) Mineralogy and petrology of the New Idria District, California: Ph.D. thesis, Stanford Univ. (Univ. Microfilms Publ. 21,266).Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, R. G. and Keith, T. E. (1971) A chemical study of serpentinization—Burro Mountain, California: J. Petrol. 12, 311–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A. and Zussman, J. (1962) Rock Forming Minerals, Vol. 3, Sheet Silicates, pp. 170–90. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Eckel, E. B. and Myers, W. B. (1946) Quicksilver deposits of the New Idria District, San Benito and Fresno Counties, California: Calif J. Mines and Geol. 42, (2) 81–124.Google Scholar
  15. Faust, G. T. and Fahey, J. J. (1962) The serpentine-group minerals: U.S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Paper 384-A.Google Scholar
  16. Faust, G. T. and Nagy, B. S. (1967) Solution studies of chrysotile, lizardite, and antigorite: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 384-B, 93–105.Google Scholar
  17. Grimsicar, A. and Oiepek, V. (1959) Yugoslav serpentine asbestos with special regards to the Stragari asbestos: Geol. Razprave in Porocila 5, 37–55.Google Scholar
  18. Hostetler, P. B., Coleman, R. G., Mumpton, F. A. and Evans, B. (1966) Bruche in alpine serpentinites: Am. Miner. 51, 75–98.Google Scholar
  19. Laizure, C. M. (1926) San Benito County: Asbestos: 22nd Rept, State Mineralogist, Calif., 223–4.Google Scholar
  20. Luce, R. W. (1972) Identification of serpentine varieties bv infrared absorption: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 750-B, 199–201.Google Scholar
  21. Matthews, R. A. (1961) Geology of the Butler Estate chro-mite mine,, southwestern Fresno County, California: Calif. Div. Mines & Geol. Spec. Rept. 71.Google Scholar
  22. Merritt, P. C. (1962) California asbestos goes to market: Mining Engng 14. 57–60.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, W. B. (1952) Asbestos in Yugoslavia: Asbestos 34, (2) 2–10; (3) 2–10; (4) 2–6.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, W. B. (1960) Notes on asbestos developments in California: Asbestos 42, No. 4.Google Scholar
  25. Mumpton, F. A., Jaffe, H. W. and Thompson, C. S. (1965) Coalingite, a new mineral from the New Idria serpen-tinite, Fresno and San Benito Counties, California: Am. Miner. 50, 1893–913.Google Scholar
  26. Mumpton, F. A. and Thompson, C. S. (1966) The stability of brucite in the weathering zone of the New Idria ser-pentinite: Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 14th Nat. Conf. pp. 249–57. Pergamon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Munro, R. C. and Reim, K. M. (1962) Coalinga asbestos fiber, a newcomer to the asbestos industry: Can. Mining J. 45–50.Google Scholar
  28. Naumann, A. W. and Dresher, W. H. (1966) The morphology of chrysotile asbestos as inferred from nitrogen adsorption data: Am. Miner. 51, 711–25.Google Scholar
  29. Page, N. J. (1968) Chemical differences among the serpentine “polymorphs”: Am. Miner. 53, 201–15.Google Scholar
  30. Page, N. J. and Coleman, R. G. (1968) Serpentine-mineral analyses and physical properties: U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 575-B, 103–7.Google Scholar
  31. Rice, S. J. (1963) California asbestos industry: Calif. Div. Mines & Geol. Inform. Sen. 16, (9) 1–7.Google Scholar
  32. Turner, F. and Verhoogen, J. (1960) Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology (2nd Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Wahlstrom, E. (1955) Theoretical igneous Petrology. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Whittaker, E. J. W. and Zussman, J. (1956) The characterization of serpentine minerals: Miner. Mag. 31, 107–26.Google Scholar
  35. Woolery, R. G. (1966) Asbestos-cellulose blends offer dramatic possibilities: Pulp and Paper Jan. 10.Google Scholar
  36. de Wolff, P. D. (1962) The crystal structure of artinite Mg2(OH)2CO3.3H2O: Acta Crystall. 5, 286–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zussman, J., Brindley, G. W. and Comer, J. J. (1957) Electron diffraction studies of serpentine minerals: Am. Miner. 42, 133–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. A. Mumpton
    • 1
  • C. S. Thompson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of The Earth SciencesState University CollegeBrockportUSA
  2. 2.R. T. Vanderbilt CorporationNorwalkUSA

Personalised recommendations