Advertisement

Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 42–44 | Cite as

Laboratory processing of halloysite

  • Peter Fenner
  • James R. Hartung
Short Notes

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, L. T., Faust, G. T., Hendricks, S. B., Insley, H., and McMurdie, H. F. (1943) Relationship of the clay minerals halloysite and endellite: Am. Mineralogist 28, 1–18.Google Scholar
  2. Bates, T. F., Hildebrand, F. A., and Swineford, A. (1950) Morphology and structure of endellite and halloysite: Am. Mineralogist 35, 463–484.Google Scholar
  3. Beutelspacher, H., and Van der Marel, H. W. (1966) Toepassing van elektronenmicroscopie in de grond-mechanica: LGM Meded. 9, 17–52.Google Scholar
  4. Brindley, G. W., and Santos, P. de S. (1966) New varieties of kaolin-group minerals and the problem of finding a suitable nomenclature: Prcc. Intern. Clay Conf. 1, 3–9.Google Scholar
  5. Chukhrov, F. V., and Zvyagin, B. B. (1966) Halloysite. A crystallo-chemically and mineralogically distinct species: Proc. Intern. Clay Conf. 1, 11–25.Google Scholar
  6. Fenner, P. (1966) Clay mineral studies: results of investigation or preparation?: Proc. Intern. Clay Conf. 1, 401–405.Google Scholar
  7. Fenner, P. (1967) Preliminary results of comminution effects studies on illite: Proc. Intern. Clay Conf. 2, 241–243.Google Scholar
  8. Figueiredo, P. M. de, F. (1965) The effect of grinding on kaolinite and attapulgite as revealed by X-ray studies: Esc. Geol. P. AIegre, Spec. Publ. 9, 1–47.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs, R. J. (1965) Error due to segregation in quantitative clay mineral X-ray diffraction mounting techniques: Am. Mineralogist 50, 741–751.Google Scholar
  10. Keller, W. D., Pickett, E. E., Reesman, A. L. (1966) Elevated dehydroxylation temperature of the Keokuk geode kaolinite—a possible reference mineral: Proc. Intern. Clay Conf. 1, 75–85.Google Scholar
  11. Kerr, P. F., Hamilton, P. K., and Pill, R. J. (1950) X-ray diffraction measurements in Kerr, P. F., et al., Analytical data on reference clay materials: API Proj. 49, Prelim. Rept. 7, 3–70.Google Scholar
  12. Mackenzie, R. C. (1967) Introduction to Section 1, Part 1: Proc. Intern. Clay Conf. 2, 2–4.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, W. D., and Keller, W. D. (1963) Differentiation between endellite-halloysite and kaolinite by treatment with potassium acetate and ethylene glycol: Clays and Clay Minerals 10, 244–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Molloy, M. W., and Kerr, P. F. (1961) Diffractometer patterns of API reference clay minerals: Am. Mineralogist 46, 583–605.Google Scholar
  15. Parrish, W. (1960) Advances in X-ray diffractometry of clay minerals: Clays and Clay Minerals 7, 230–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pundsack, F. L. (1958) Density and structure of endellite in clays and clay mineralogy: Clays and Clay Minerals 5, 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schultz, L. G. (1955) Mineralogical-particle size variations in oriented clay aggregates: J. Sediment Petrol. 25, 124–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Takahashi, H. (1959) Effect of dry grinding on kaolin minerals: Clays and Clay Minerals 6, 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weiss, A., and Russow, J. (1965) Über das einrollen von Kaolinitkristallen zu Halloysitähnlichen Röhren und einen unterschied zwischen Halloysite und Röhrchenförmigem Kaolinit: Proc. Intern. Clay Conf. 2, 69–74,Google Scholar
  20. Weiss, A., and Thielepape, W. (1965) Über eine Verbesserung der Technischen eigenschaften von Kaolinit durch die Herstellung von Einlagerungsverbindungen: Proc. Intern. Clay Conf. 2, 427–429.Google Scholar
  21. Wheeler, G. V., and Burkhardt, W. (1950) Semi-quantitative spectrographic analyses in Kerr, P. F., et al., Analytical data on reference clay materials: API Proj. 49, Prelim. Rept. 7, 71–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Fenner
    • 1
    • 2
  • James R. Hartung
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.CEGS, American Geological InstituteWashington, D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations