Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 149–162 | Cite as

Geometry Effects for Specific Electrical Conductance in Clays and Soils

  • A. Cremers
  • J. van Loon
  • H. Laudelout
Symposium on Surface Reactivity


A systematic study of the influence of salinity and clay content on the electrical conductivity of sodium-illite clay gels shows that the geometry or “formation resistivity factors” of such systems can adequately be described by the model of oblate ellipsoids, used to simulate the shape of the clay particles. This conclusion is in agreement with the results previously obtained on kaolinite and montmorillonite clays. An axial ratio of 16 was found for the illite clay particles.

On the basis of Burger’s and Maxwell’s equations for electric flow through porous media, formulae are derived for calculating the electrical conductivity of mixed systems, i.e. “clay 1 + clay 2 + electrolyte solution” and “clay + spherical particles + electrolyte solution”. The electrical conductivity of these systems is expressed in terms of the shape parameters, surface conductances, specific surfaces and volume concentrations of the constituents. The type of equation can eventually lead to an explanation (in terms of a non-uniform particle shape distribution) of the anomalous geometry effects in some clays.

Experimental results conform fairly well to the equations. Glass powder at volume fraction between 0.18 and 0.60 added to a 17.4% montmorillonite gel acts as an inert diluent on the specific electrical conductivity of the mixture. For a mixture of 1 part montmorillonite to 9 parts kaolinite, the measured specific electrical conductivity agrees within about 10% with the predicted over the range studied (volume fraction of montmorillonite: 0.035 to 0.039; mixture porosity: 0.61 to 0.660; salt concentration range: 0.5 n to 2 n NaCl).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, D. M., and Low, P. F. (1958) The density of water adsorbed by lithium, sodium and potassium bentonite, Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 22, 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archie, G. E. (1942) The electrical conductivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics, Trans. A.I.M.E. 146, 55–62.Google Scholar
  3. Bloksma, A. H. (1957) The diffusion of sodium and iodide ions and urea in clay pastes, Jour. Coll. Sci. 12, 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böttcher, C. J. F. (1945) The dielectric constant of crystalline powders, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays Bas. 64, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruggeman, D. A. G. (1935) The calculation of various physical constants of heterogeneous substances. I. The dielectric constants and conductivities of mixtures composed of isotropic substances, Ann. Physik. 24, 636–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burger, H. C (1919) Das Leitvermogen verdunnter mischkristallfreien Legierungen, Phys. Zeits. 20, 73–5.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, N. O. (1948) Electrical conductivity of foam, Trans. Faraday Soc. 44, 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cremers, A., and Latjdelotjt, H. (1965a) Conductivité électrique des gels argileux et anisométrie de leurs éléments, Jour. Chim. Phys. 62, 1155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cremers, A., and Latjdelotjt, H. (19656) On the “Isoconductivity value” of clay gels, Soil Sci. 100, 298–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dakshinamtjrti, S. (1960) Studies on the conductivity of clay systems, Soil Sci. 90, 302–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dutt, G. R., and Low, P. F. (1961) Relationship between the activation energy for deuterium oxide diffusion and exchangeable ion conductance in clay systems, Soil Sci. 93, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fricke, H. (1924) A mathematical treatment of the electrical conductivity and capacity of disperse systems, Phys. Rev. 24, 575–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glasstone, S., Laidler, K. J., and Eyring, H. (1941) The Theory of Rate Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Lai, T. M., and Mortland, M. M. (1961) Diffusion of ions in bentonite and vermiculite, Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 25, 353–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lai, T. M., and Mortland, M. M. (1962) Self-diffusion of exchangeable cations in bentonite, Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 9th Conf., Pergamon Press, New York, 229–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leonard, R. A., and Low, P. F. (1964) Effect of salt on water movement in soils, Presented at meeting of Amer. Soc. Agronomy in Kansas City.Google Scholar
  17. Low, P. F. (1962) Influence of adsorbed water on exchangeable ion movement, Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 9th Conf., Pergamon Press, New York, 219–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Low, P. F. (1958) The apparent mobilities of exchangeable alkali metal cations in bentonite water systems, Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 22, 395–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, H., and Laudelout, H. (1963) Thermodynamique de l’echange des cations alcalins dans les argiles, Jour. Chim. Phys. 60, 1086–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maxwell, S (1887) A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 2nd ed. vol. I, 435, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Meredith, R. E. (1959) Studies on the conductivities of dispersions, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory Report, U.C.R.L.—8667.Google Scholar
  22. Meredith, R. E., and Tobias, C. W. (1962) Conduction in heterogeneous systems, Adv. Electr. and Electrochem. Engr. 2, 15–47.Google Scholar
  23. Patnode, H. W., and Wyllie, M. R. J. (1950) The presence of conductive solids in reservoir rocks as a factor in electric log interpretation, Trans. A.I.M.E. 189, 47–52.Google Scholar
  24. Penman, H. L. (1940a) Gas and vapor movements in the soil. I. The diffusion of vapours through porous solids, Jour. Agr. Sci. 30, 437–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Penman, H. L. (1940b) Gas and vapor movements in the soil. II. The diffusion of carbondioxide through porous solids, Jour. Agr. Sci. 30, 570–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Street, N. (1956a) Effect of surface conductance on drilling mud resistivity, Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol Geol. 40, 1996–2000.Google Scholar
  27. Street, N. (1956b) The surface conductance of kaolinite, Australian Jour. Chem. 9, 333–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Street, N. (1963) On “the Isoconductivity value” of clays, Soil Sci. 95, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wyllie, M. R. J., and Southwick, P. P. (1954) An experimental investigation on the S.P. and resistivity phenomena in dirty sands, Trans. A.I.M.E. 201, 43–56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Clay Minerals Society 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Cremers
    • 1
  • J. van Loon
    • 1
  • H. Laudelout
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of AgronomyUniversity of LouvainHeverle-LouvainBelgium

Personalised recommendations