Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 200–209 | Cite as

Mineralogy of Ordovician K-Bentonites in Kentucky

  • Warren D. Huff
Symposium on Clay Mineral Transformation


Preliminary results of investigations of Trenton-Black River (Ordovician) K-bentonites from well cores in northern Kentucky and from outcrops along the Kentucky River illustrate the variations in some physical and chemical properties. It is hoped that some features may eventually be useful in stratigraphic correlation, considering that the very nature of these altered ash beds makes them ideal time-lines.

That these beds are derived from volcanic ash is evidenced by significant amounts of biotite, magnetite, leucoxene, apatite, and zircon.

The following means of investigation have been employed: X-ray diffraction, DTA, cation exchange, heavy mineral studies, and insoluble residue studies of adjacent limestones. X-ray analyses of untreated and glycolated clay samples indicate a mixed-layer, dioctahedral, illite-montmorillonite type structure with an I-M ratio varying from 4:1 to 3:2. The proportion of expandable layers in many samples is higher than that reported for Ordovician K-bentonites elsewhere. No evidence of chlorite is detected.

DTA data show a primary hydroxyl peak near 725°C suggesting a basic montmorillonite-type of hydroxyl bonding. Treatment with 1M solutions of various cations produces a slight expansion of the expandable layers with Ca2+, and contraction with Na+, K+, and NH4+ giving some indication of original environmental composition. The evidence supports suggestions by earlier authors that the clays are basically montmorillonites which have undergone partial contraction due to the adsorption of potassium in the interlayer positions.

While euhedral zircons are most likely non-detrital, recent work on zircons in igneous rocks suggests the same may also be true for some of the sub-rounded and fractured species.

Insoluble residues of limestones contain abundant chert and mixed-layer illite-montmorillonite clay directly adjacent to the ash beds, but farther away illite and chlorite dominate and are probably detrital in origin.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, V. T. (1932) Ordovician altered volcanic material in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri: J. Geol., v.37, pp.239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradley, W. F. (1945) Diagnostic criteria for clay minerals: Am. Min., v.30, pp.704–713.Google Scholar
  3. Fox, P. P., and Grant, L. F. (1944) Ordovician bentonites in Tennessee and adjacent states: J. Oeol., v.52, pp.332.Google Scholar
  4. Grim, R. E., and Rowland, R. H. (1942) Differential thermal analyses of clay minerals and other hydrous materials: Amer. Min., v.27, pp.801–818.Google Scholar
  5. Kay, G. M. (1931) Stratigraphy of the Ordovician Hounsfield metabentonite: J. Geol., v.39, pp.361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kay, G. M. (1935) Distribution of Ordovician altered volcanic materials and related clays: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v.46, pp.225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kerr, P. F., Kulp, J. L., and Hamilton, P. K. (1949) DTA of reference clay mineral specimens: Prelim, rept. No. 3, Reference Clay Minerals, A.P.I. Research Project 49, Amer. Petrol. Inst., New York.Google Scholar
  8. Larsen, L. H., and Poldervaart, A. (1957) Measurement and distribution of zircons in some granitic rocks of magmatic origin: Min. Mag., v.31, pp.544–564.Google Scholar
  9. Larsen, L. H., and Poldervaart, A. (1961) Petrologic study of Bald Rock Batholith, near Bidwell Bar, California: Oeol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v.72, pp.69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MacEwan, D. M. C., Amil, A. R., and Brown, G. (1961) Ch. XI in Brown, G. (ed.) The X-ray Identification and Crystal Structures of Clays and Clay Minerals: Mineralogical Society, London, pp.393–445.Google Scholar
  11. MacKenzie, R. C. (1957) ed., The Differential Thermal Investigation of Clays: Mineralogical Society, London, 456 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Nelson, W. A. (1922) Volcanic ash beds in the Ordovician of Tennessee, Kentucky and Alabama: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v.33, pp.605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosenkrans, R. R. (1933) Correlation of Ordovician bentonites: M.S. Thesis, Pa. State College.Google Scholar
  14. Ross, C. S. (1955) Provenance of pyroclastic materials: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v.66, pp.427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ross, C. S., and Hendricks, S. B. (1945) Minerals of the montmorillonite group: U. S.O.S. Prof. Paper 205-B, pp.23–79.Google Scholar
  16. Siever, R. (1962) Silica solubility, 0°–200°C, and the diagenesis of siliceous sediments: Jour, of Geol. v.70, pp.127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Warshaw, C. M., and Roy, R. (1961) Classification and a scheme for the identification of layer silicates: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v.72, pp.1455–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weaver, C. E. (1953) Mineralogy and petrology of some Ordovician K-bentonites and related limestones: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v.64, pp.921–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weaver, C. E. (1958) The effects and geologic significance of potassium “fixation” by expandable clay minerals derived from muscovite, biotite, chlorite, and volcanic material: Amer. Min., v.43, pp.839–861.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1962

Authors and Affiliations

  • Warren D. Huff
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations