Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 169–177 | Cite as

Nonmontmorillonitic Composition of Some Bentonite Beds

  • L. G. Schultz
Symposium on Clay Mineral Transformation


Although the wide range of minerals resulting from alteration of tuffaceous rocks under hydrothermal and weathering conditions is well known, the extent of variation in composition of discrete bentonite beds subjected only to normal diagenesis and compaction is perhaps less well known.

Three bentonite samples from the Atoka Formation of Pennsylvanian age are predominantly mixed-layer illite-montmorillonite with subordinate kaolinite. Most bentonites in the Fierre Shale of Late Cretaceous age are entirely montmorillonite, but a few contain some kaolinite; one is predominantly kaolinite; some also contain appreciable interlayer Al(OH)3 or Mg(OH)2 forming a mixed-layer montmorillonite-chlorite clay; several are composed of considerable clinoptilolite, and one is largely phillipsite. Bentonite beds in the Carmel Formation of Middle and Late Jurassic age differ among themselves in composition; in a few, illite is the dominant clay; in others, mixed-layer chlorite-montmorillonite-illite in different proportions is the dominant clay; kaolinite is common and makes up nearly half of one sample. A rhyolite tuff near Denver, Colorado, has been altered to halloysite. Reasons for variation in the composition of these bentonites are only partly understood.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ames, L. L., Sand, L. B., and Goldich, S. S. (1958) A contribution on the Hector, California, bentonite deposit: Econ. Geol., v.53, pp.22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, A. E., Jonas, E. C., and Odum, H. T. (1958) Alteration of clay minerals by digestive processes of marine organisms: Science, v.127, pp.190–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrew, R. W., Jackson, M. L. and Wada, K. (1960) Intersalation as a technique for differentiation of kaolinite from chloritic minerals by X-ray diffraction: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., v.24, pp.422–424.Google Scholar
  4. Bramlette, M. N., and Posnjak, E. (1933) Zeolitic alteration of pyroclastics: Amer. Min., v.18, pp.167–171.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, G. (1951) Nomenclature of the mica clay minerals, pt. II of the mica clay minerals, in Brindley, G. W., ed., X-ray Identification and Structure of the Clay Minerals: London, The Mineralogical Soc., pp.155–172.Google Scholar
  6. Bystrom, A. M. (1954) “Mixed-layer” minerals from the Ordovician bentonite beds at Kinnekulle, Sweden: Nature, v.173, pp.783–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caillère, S., and Hénin (1949) Experimental formation of ehlorites from montmorillonite: Min. Mag., v.28, pp.612–620.Google Scholar
  8. Deffeyes, K. S. (1959) Zeolites in sedimentary rocks: J. Sed. Petrology, v.29, pp.602–609.Google Scholar
  9. Denisov, A. M., and Kovalenko, D. N. (1955) The mineral compositions of some bentonite clays in the Ukraine: Akad. Nauk. Ukr. SSE., Sobornik 1955, no.1, pp.15–22.Google Scholar
  10. Fenner, C. N. (1916) Bore hole investigation in Yellowstone Park: J. Geology, v.44, pp.225–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frezon, S. E., and Schultz, L. G. (1961) Possible bentonite beds in the Atoka Formation in Arkansas and Oklahoma, in Short papers in the Geologic and Hydrologie Sciences: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 424-C, pp.C82–84.Google Scholar
  12. Grim, R. E. (1953) Clay Mineralogy: McGraw-Hill, New York, 384 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hathaway, J. C. (1955) Studies of some vermiculite-type clay minerals: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.-Natl. Res. Council pub. 395, pp.74–86.Google Scholar
  14. Hofmann, Franz (1956) Zur Frage der Entstehung des glimmerartigen Tons in der Trias des Monte Caslano, Kanton Tessin: Schweiz. Miner. u. Petrog. Mitt., Bd.36, pp.489–496.Google Scholar
  15. Hosterman, J. W., Scheid, V. E., Allen, V. T., and Sohn, I. G. (1960) Investigations of some clay deposits in Washington and Idaho: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1091, 147 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Hunt, C. B. (1954) Pleistocene and recent deposits of the Denver area, Colorado: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 996-C, pp.91–140.Google Scholar
  17. MacEwan, D. M. C. (1956) A study of an interstratified illite-montmorillonite clay from Worcestershire, England: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.-Natl. Res. Council, pub. 456, pp.166–172.Google Scholar
  18. Martin-Vivaldi, J. L. (1961) The bentonites of southeast Spain and of the north zone of Morocco: Abs. in Austin, Texas, 10th Clay Minerals Conf. program, pp.20–21.Google Scholar
  19. Mattyasovscky-Zsolnay, L. (1946) Illite, montmoriUonite and volcanic ash as whiteware body ingredients: Amer. Ceramic Soc. J., v.29, pp.254–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ponder, H., and Keller, W. D. (1960) Geology, mineralogy, and genesis of selected fireclays from Latah County, Idaho: in Clays and Clay Minerals, 8th Conf., Pergamon Press, pp.44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roberson, H. E. (1961) Petrology of Tertiary bentonites of Texas: Abs. in Austin, Texas, 10th Clay Minerals Conf. program, pp.26–27.Google Scholar
  22. Ross, C. S., and Shannon, E. V. (1926) Minerals of bentonite and related clays and their physical properties: Amer. Ceramic Soc. J., v.9, pp.77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schlocker, Julius and Van Horn, Richard (1958) Alteration of volcanic ash near Denver, Colorado: J. Sed. Petrology, v.28, pp.31–35.Google Scholar
  24. Schultz, L. G., and Wright, J. C. (in preparation) Bentonite beds of unusual composition in the Carmel Formation, southwest Utah: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 450E.Google Scholar
  25. Sherman, G. D. (1952) The genesis and morphology of the aluminarich laterite clays [Hawaii]: in Problems of clay and laterite genesis, Amer. Inst. Mining Metall. Eng., symposium, annual meeting, Feb. 1951, pp.154–161.Google Scholar
  26. Slaughter, M., and Milne, I. H. (1960) The formation of chloritelike structures from montmorillonite: in Clays and Clay Minerals, 7th Conf., Pergamon Press, pp.114–124.Google Scholar
  27. Spjeldnaes, Nils, and Hagemann, F. (1955) Ordovician and Silurian bentonite beds in the Oslo area [abs.]: Norsk Geol. Tidssk., Bd.35, pp.207.Google Scholar
  28. Sudo, T. (1951) Minerals from pumiceous tuff in Japan: Science, no. 113, pp.266–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sudo, T. (1955) Clay mineral work proceeding in Japan: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.-Natl. Res. Council, pub. 456, pp.185–195.Google Scholar
  30. Sudo, T. and Takahashi, H. (1955) Shapes of haUoysite particles in Japanese clays: in Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.-Natl. Res. Council, pub. 456, pp.67–81.Google Scholar
  31. Weaver, C. E. (1953) Mineralogy and petrology of some Ordovician K-bentonites and related limestones: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v.64, pp.921–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wright, J. C., and Dickey, D. D. (in preparation) Relations of the Navajo and Carmel Formations in southwestern Utah and adjoining Arizona: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 450E.Google Scholar
  33. Youell, R. F. (1960) An electrolytic method for producing chlorite-like substances from montmorillonite: Clay Min. Bull., v.4, pp.191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yurgenson, E. (1958) Metabentonites in Estonian SSR: Trudy Inst. Qeol. Akad. Nauk Eaton. SSR., v.2, pp.73–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1962

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. G. Schultz
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations