Advertisement

Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 65–73 | Cite as

Weathering of Stone Mountain Granite

  • Willard H. Grant
Symposium on Clay Mineral Transformation

Abstract

The weathering of Stone Mountain Granite (adamellite) forms kaoiinite, endellite, allophane and gibbsite of which kaolinite is the most stable. Bulk density ranges from 2.65 in fresh rock to a minimum of 1.48 in saprolite. It is a good index of weathering. Abrasion pH ranges from 5.0 in saprolite to 9.3 in fresh rock, and is directly related to bulk density and the amount of clay mineral. Among the original minerals, biotite is least stable, followed by oligoclase. Residual microcline fragments occur at the base of the B horizon indicating that it is not completely weathered. Muscovite weathers slightly and quartz appears quite stable.

Evidence shows that solution and reconstitution is necessary in the formation of some if not all clay minerals. This is particularly evident in the formation of endellite veins.

Expansion of the rock in the early phases of weathering occurs but does not produce a significant increase in volume.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blackwelder, E. (1925) Exfoliation as a phase of rock weathering: J. Geol., v.33, pp.793–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Correns, D. W. and v. Engelhardt, W. (1938) Neue Untersuchungen über die Verwitterung des Kalifeldspates: Naturwiss., Jg. 26, Heft 9, pp.137–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Correns, D. W. (1949) Einfuhrung in die Mineralogie: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 414 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grant, W. H. (1962) Field excursion, Stone Mountain Lithonia District: Guidebook No. 2, Georgia Dept. of Mines, Mining and Geology, 21 p.Google Scholar
  5. Herrmann, L. A. (1954) Geology of the Stone Mountain Lithonia District: Georgia Geol. Surv., Bull. 61, 139 p.Google Scholar
  6. Hopson, C. A. (1954) Exfoliation and weathering at Stone Mountain, Georgia: Georgia Mineral Newsletter, v.11, No.3, pp.65–79.Google Scholar
  7. Kerr, P. F. and Kulp, J. L. (1948) Multiple differential thermal analysis: Amer. Min., v.33, pp.387–419.Google Scholar
  8. Krauskopf, K. B. (1956) Dissolution and precipitation of silica at low temperatures: Geochim. et Cosmoahim. Acta, v.10, pp.1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. LeGrand, H. E. (1949) Sheet structure, a major factor in the occurrence of ground water in the granites of Georgia: Econ. Geol., v.44, pp.110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. LeGrand, H. E. (1958) Chemical character of water in the igneous and metamorphic rocks of North Carolina: Econ. Geol., v.53, pp.178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mindling, G. W. (1941) Climate of Georgia: Climate and Man, Yearbook of Agriculture 1941, pp.819–828.Google Scholar
  12. Sand. L. B. and Bates, T. L. (1953) Mineralogy of the residual kaolins of the Southern Appalachians: Amer. Min., v.38, p.358.Google Scholar
  13. Stevens, R. E. and Carron, M. K. (1948) Simple field test for distinguishing minerals by abrasion pH: Amer. Min., v.33, pp.31–49.Google Scholar
  14. Sudo, T. and Takahashi, H. (1956) Shapes of halloysite particles in Japanese clays: Clays and Clay Minerals, Natl. Acad. Sci.—Natl. Res. Council, Pub. 356, pp.67–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1962

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willard H. Grant
    • 1
  1. 1.Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations