Speeds of Propagation in Classical and Relativistic Extended Thermodynamics
 837 Downloads
 29 Citations
Abstract
The NavierStokesFourier theory of viscous, heatconducting fluids provides parabolic equations and thus predicts infinite pulse speeds. Naturally this feature has disqualified the theory for relativistic thermodynamics which must insist on finite speeds and, moreover, on speeds smaller than c. The attempts at a remedy have proved heuristically important for a new systematic type of thermodynamics: Extended thermodynamics. That new theory has symmetric hyperbolic field equations and thus it provides finite pulse speeds.
Extended thermodynamics is a whole hierarchy of theories with an increasing number of fields when gradients and rates of thermodynamic processes become steeper and faster. The first stage in this hierarchy is the 14field theory which may already be a useful tool for the relativist in many applications. The 14 fields — and further fields — are conveniently chosen from the moments of the kinetic theory of gases.
The hierarchy is complete only when the number of fields tends to infinity. In that case the pulse speed of nonrelativistic extended thermodynamics tends to infinity while the pulse speed of relativistic extended thermodynamics tends to c, the speed of light.
In extended thermodynamics symmetric hyperbolicity — and finite speeds — are implied by the concavity of the entropy density. This is still true in relativistic thermodynamics for a privileged entropy density which is the entropy density of the rest frame for nondegenerate gases.
1 Introduction
Relativistic thermodynamics is needed, because in relativity the mass of a body depends on how hot it is and the temperature is not necessarily homogeneous in equilibrium. But unlike classical thermodynamics the relativistic theory cannot be constructed on the intuitive notions of heat and work, because our intuition does not work well with relativistic effects. Therefore we must rely upon logic, or what would seem logical: the cautious and careful extrapolation of the tenets of nonrelativistic thermodynamics.
A pioneer of this strategy was Carl Eckart [14, 15, 16] who — as early as 1940 — established the thermodynamics of irreversible processes, a theory now universally known by the acronym TIP. The third of Eckart’s three papers addresses the relativistic theory of a fluid. Eckart’s theory is an important step away from equilibria toward nonequilibrium processes. It provides the NavierStokes equations for the deviatoric stress and a generalization of Fourier’s law of heat conduction. The latter permits a heat flux to be generated by an acceleration, or a temperature gradient to be equilibrated by a gravitational field.
But Eckart’s theories — the relativistic and nonrelativistic ones — have one drawback: They lead to parabolic equations for the temperature and velocity and thus predict infinite pulse speeds. Naturally relativists, who know that no speed can exceed c, are particularly disturbed by this result and they like to call it a paradox.
Cattaneo [7] proposed a solution of the paradox as far as it concerns heat conduction^{1}. He reasoned that under rapid changes of temperature the heat flux is somewhat influenced by the history of the temperature gradient and he was thus able to produce a hyperbolic equation for the temperature — actually a telegraph equation. Müller [35, 37] incorporated this idea into TIP and came up with a fully hyperbolic system for temperature and velocity. He calculated the pulse speeds and found them to be of the order of magnitude of the speed of sound, far removed from c. And indeed, neither Cattaneo’s nor Müller’s arguments have anything to do with relativity, although Müller [35] also formulated his theory relativistically. The theory became known as Extended Thermodynamics, because the canonical list of fields — density, velocity, temperature — is extended in this theory to include stress and heat flux, 14 fields altogether.
The pulse speed problem may not be the most important question in thermodynamics but it is a question that can be answered, and has to be answered, and so there was a series of papers on the problem all using extended thermodynamics of 14 fields. Israel [21] — who reinvented extended thermodynamics in 1976 — and Kranys [24] and Stewart [46], and Boillat [2], and Seccia & Strumia [44] all calculate the pulse speed for classical as well as for relativistic gases, degenerate and nondegenerate, for Bosons and Fermions, and for the ultrarelativistic case. Actually in some of these gases the pulse speed reaches the order of magnitude of c but it never exceeds it.
So far, so good! But now consider this: The 14 fields mentioned above are the first moments in the kinetic theory of gases and the kinetic theory knows many more moments. In fact, in the kinetic theory we may define infinitely many moments of an increasing tensorial rank. And so Müller and his coworkers, particularly Kremer [25, 26], Weiss [49, 51, 50] and Struchtrup [47], came to realize that the original extended thermodynamics was not extended far enough. Guided by the kinetic theory of gases they formulated manymoment theories. These theories have proved their validity and relevance for quickly changing processes and processes with steep gradients, in particular for light scattering, sound dispersion, shock wave structure and radiation thermodynamics. And each theory predicts a new pulse speed. Weiss [49], working with the nonrelativistic kinetic theory of gases, demonstrated that the pulse speed increases with an increasing number of moments.
Boillat & Ruggeri [4] proved this observation and — very recently — Boillat & Ruggeri [5] also proved that the pulse speed tends to infinity in the nonrelativistic kinetic theory as the number of moments becomes infinite. As yet unpublished is the corresponding result by Boillat & Ruggeri [6, 3] in the relativistic case by which the pulse speed tends to c as the number of moments increases. These results put an end to the longstanding paradox of pulse speeds  50 years after Cattaneo; they are reviewed in Section 3 and 4.

basis equations are of balance type; hence there is the possibility of weak solutions and shocks,

constitutive equations are local in spacetime; hence follow quasilinear firstorder field equations,

entropy inequality with a concave entropy density; this implies symmetric hyperbolic field equations.
The latter property is essential for finite speeds and for the wellposedness of initial value problems which is a feature at least as desirable as finite speeds. The formal structure of the theory is described in Section 2; it was constructed by Ruggeri and his coworkers, particularly Strumia and Boillat, see [43, 41, 4]. A convenient presentation may be found in the book by Müller & Ruggeri [39] of which a second edition has just appeared [40].
Section 5 presents extended thermodynamics of viscous, heatconducting gases due to Liu, Müller & Ruggeri [31], a theory of 14 fields. That section demonstrates the restrictive character of the thermodynamic constitutive theory by showing that most constitutive coefficients can be reduced to the thermal equation of state. Also new insight is provided into the form of the transport coefficients: bulk and shearviscosity, and thermal conductivity, which are all explicitly related here to the relaxation times of the gas.
This whole review is concerned with a macroscopic theory: Extended thermodynamics. It is true that some of the tenets of extended thermodynamics are strongly motivated by the kinetic theory of gases, for instance the choice of moments as variables. But even so, extended thermodynamics is a field theory in its own right, it is not kinetic theory.
The kinetic theory, complete with Boltzmann equation and Sto\zahlansatz, offers another possibility of discussing finite propagation speeds — or speeds smaller than c in the relativistic case. Such discussions are more directly based on the observation that the atoms cannot be faster than c. Thus Cercignani [8] has directly linked the phase speed of small harmonic waves to the speed of particles and proved that the phase speeds are smaller than c. Cercignani & Majorana in a followup paper [9] have exploited the full dispersion relation to calculate phase speeds and attenuation as functions of frequency, albeit for a simplified collision term. Earlier works on the kinetic theory which address the question of propagation speeds include Sirovich & Thurber [45] and Wang Chang & Uhlenbeck [48]. These works, however, are not subjects of this review.
2 Scope and Structure, Characteristic Speeds

field equations of balance type

local constitutive equations

entropy balance inequality

concavity of entropy density
Thermodynamic processes are defined and characteristic speeds and the pulse speed are introduced.
2.1 Thermodynamic processes
Thermodynamics, and in particular relativistic thermodynamics is a field theory with the primary objective to determine the thermodynamic fields. These are typically the 14 fields of the number density of particles, the particle flux vector and the fields of the stressenergymomentum tensor. However, in extended thermodynamics we have generally more fields and therefore it is better — at least for the initial arguments — to leave the number of fields and their tensorial character unspecified. Therefore we consider n fields, combined in the nvector u(x^{D}). x^{D} denotes the spacetime components of an event. We have x^{0} = ct and x^{d} = (x^{1}, x^{2}, x^{3})^{2}.
If the constitutive functions ̂F^{A} and ̂π are explicitly known, we may eliminate F^{A} and π between the balance equations (1) and the constitutive relations (2) and obtain a set of explicit field equations for the fields u. These are quasilinear partial differential equations of first order. Every solution of the field equations is called a thermodynamic process.
2.2 Elements of the constitutive theory
Since, however, the constitutive functions ̂F^{A} and ̂π are generally not explicitly known, the major task of thermodynamics is the determination of these functions, or at least the restriction of their generality. In simple cases it is possible to reduce the constitutive functions to a few coefficients which may be turned over to the experimentalist for measurement. The formulation and exploitation of such restrictions is the subject of the constitutive theory.
 The Entropy Inequality. The entropy density h^{0} and the entropy flux h^{a} combine to form a fourvector h^{A} = (ch^{0}, h^{a}), whose divergence h^{A}_{,A} is equal to the entropy production ∑. The fourvector h^{A} and ∑ are both constitutive quantities and ∑ is assumed nonnegative for all thermodynamic processes. Thus we may write h^{A} = ̂h^{A}(u), ∑ = ̂∑(u) andThis inequality is clearly an extrapolation of the entropy inequalities known in thermostatics and thermodynamics of irreversible processes; it was first stated in this generality by Müller [36, 38].$${h^A}_{,A} = \Sigma \ge 0\;\;\;\;\forall \;\;\;\;{\rm{thermodynamic processes}}{\rm{.}}$$(3)
 The Principle of Relativity. The principle of relativity requires that the field equations and the entropy inequality have the same form in allThe formal statement and exploitation of this principle have to await a specific choice for the fields u and the fourfluxes F^{A}.

Galilei frames for the nonrelativistic case, or in all

Lorentz frames for the relativistic case.

 The Requirement of Concavity of the Entropy Density. It is possible, and indeed common, to make a specific choice for the fields u and the concavity postulate is contingent upon that choice.
 In the nonrelativistic case we choose the fields u as the densities F^{0}. The requirement of concavity demands that the entropy density h^{0} be a concave function of the variables F^{0}:$$\frac{{{\partial ^2}{h^0}}}{{\partial {F^0}\partial {F^0}}} \sim {\rm{negative}}\;{\rm{definite}}.$$(4)
 In the relativistic case we choose the fields u as the densities F_{ζ} = F^{A}ζ_{A} in a generic Lorentz frame that moves with the fourvelocity cζ_{A} with respect to the observer. We have ζ^{A}ζ_{A} = 1 and ζ^{0} > 0. We cannot be certain that in all these frames the entropy density h_{ζ} = h^{A}ζ_{A} is concave as a function of F_{ζ} . Therefore we assume that there is at least one ζ_{A} — a privileged one, denoted by ̄ζ_{A} — such that h_{̄ζ} = h^{A}̄ζ_{A} is concave with respect to F_{̄ζ} = F^{A}ζ_{A}, viz.The privileged covector ̄ζ_{A} remains to be chosen, see Section 4.1.$$\frac{{{\partial ^2}{h_{\bar \zeta }}}}{{\partial {F_{\bar \zeta }}\partial {F_{\bar \zeta }}}} \sim {\rm{negative}}\;{\rm{definite}}{\rm{.}}$$(5)

In both cases the concavity postulate makes it possible that the entropy be maximal for a particular set of fields — the set corresponding to equilibrium — and that is its attraction for physicists. For mathematicians the attraction of the concavity postulate lies in the observation that concavity implies symmetric hyperbolicity of the field equations, see Sections 3.2 and 4.2 below.
2.3 Exploitation of the entropy inequality, Lagrange multipliers
The differential forms (8) represent a generalization of the Gibbs equation of equilibrium thermodynamics; the classical Gibbs equation for the entropy density is here generalized into four equations for the entropy fourflux. Relation (9) is the residual entropy inequality which represents the irreversible entropy production. Note that the entropy production is entirely due to the production terms in the balance equations.
2.4 Characteristic speeds
3 Finite Speeds in NonRelativistic Extended Thermodynamics

finite characteristic speeds and

wellposedness of initial value problems.
Thus we conclude that no paradox of infinite speeds can arise in extended thermodynamics, — at least not for finitely many variables.
A commonly treated special case occurs when the fields u are moments of the phase density of a gas. In this case the pulse speed depends on the degree of extension, i.e. on the number n of fields u. For a gas in equilibrium the pulse speeds can be calculated for any n. Also it can be estimated that the pulse speed tends to infinity as n grows to infinity.
3.1 Concavity of the entropy density
The transformation F^{0} ⇔ Λ helps us to recognize the structure of the field equations and to find generic restrictions on the constitutive functions.
3.2 Symmetric hyperbolicity
A quasilinear system of the type (23) with symmetric coefficient matrices, of which the temporal one is definite, is called symmetric hyperbolic. We conclude that symmetric hyperbolicity of the equations (23) for the fields Λ is equivalent to the concavity of the entropy density h^{0} in terms of the fields of densities F^{0}.
Hyperbolicity implies finite characteristic speeds, and symmetric hyperbolic systems guarantee the wellposedness of initial value problems, i.e. existence and uniqueness of solutions — at least in the neighbourhood of an event — and continuous dependence on the data.
Thus without having actually calculated a single characteristic speed, we have resolved Cattaneo’s paradox of infinite speeds. The structure of extended thermodynamics guarantees that all speeds are finite; no paradox can occur!
The fact that a system of balancetype field equations is symmetric hyperbolic, if it is compatible with the entropy inequality and the concavity of the entropy density was discovered by Godunov [19] in the special case of Eulerian fluids. In general this was proved by Boillat [1]. Ruggeri & Strumia [43] have found that the symmetry is revealed only when the Lagrange multipliers are chosen as variables; these authors were strongly motivated by Liu’s results of 1972 and by a paper by Friedrichs & Lax [18] which appeared a year earlier.
3.3 Moments as variables
3.4 Specific form of the phase density
Therefore symmetric hyperbolicity of the system (34) and hence the concavity of the entropy density with respect to the variables F _{α} ^{0} is implied by the moment character of the fields and the form of the fourflux of entropy.
3.5 Pulse speeds in a nondegenerate gas in equilibrium
Pulse speed in extended thermodynamics of moments. n: Number of moments, N: Highest degree of moments, V_{max}/c_{0}: Pulse speed.
n  N  V_{max}/c_{0} 

4  1  0.77459667 
10  2  1.34164079 
20  3  1.80822948 
35  4  2.21299946 
56  5  2.57495874 
84  6  2.90507811 
120  7  3.21035245 
165  8  3.49555791 
220  9  3.76412372 
286  10  4.01860847 
364  11  4.26098014 
455  12  4.26098014 
560  13  4.71528716 
680  14  4.92949284 
816  15  5.13625617 
969  16  5.3362913 
1140  17  5.53020569 
1330  18  5.71852112 
1540  19  5.90168962 
1771  20  6.08010585 
2024  21  6.25411673 
2300  22  6.42402919 
2600  23  6.59011627 
2925  24  6.75262213 
3276  25  6.91176615 
3654  26  7.06774631 
4060  27  7.22074198 
4495  28  7.37091629 
4960  29  7.51841807 
5456  30  7.66338362 
5984  31  7.80593804 
6545  32  7.94619654 
7140  33  8.08426549 
7770  34  8.22024331 
8436  35  8.35422129 
9139  36  8.48628432 
9880  37  8.61651144 
10660  38  8.74497644 
11480  39  8.87174833 
12341  40  8.99689171 
13244  41  9.12046722 
14190  42  9.24253184 
15180  43  9.36313918 
Inspection of Table 1 shows that the pulse speed increases monotonically with the number of moments and there is clearly a suspicion that it may tend to infinity as n goes to infinity. This suspicion will presently be confirmed.
3.6 A lower bound for the pulse speed of a nondegenerate gas
The proof of (49) rests on the realization that — because of symmetry — \({p_\alpha } = {p^{{i_1}}}{p^{{i_2}}} \ldots {p^{{i_l}}}\) has only \(\frac{1}{2}(l + 1)(l + 2)\) independent components and they are simply powers of p^{1}, p^{2} and p^{3}, so that p_{α} may be written as (p^{1})^{p}(p^{2})^{q}(p^{3})^{r} with p + q + r = l. Accordingly \({p_\beta } = {p^{{j_1}}}{p^{{j_2}}} \ldots {p^{{j_k}}}\) may be written as (p^{1})^{s}(p^{2})^{t}(p^{3})^{u} with s + t + u = k.
An easy check will show that for each N the value \(\sqrt {{\textstyle{6 \over 5}}(N  {\textstyle{1 \over 2}})} \) lies below the corresponding values of Table 1, as they must. It may well be possible to tighten the estimate (49).
4 Finite Speeds in Relativistic Extended Thermodynamics
In the relativistic theory the entropy density is not a scalar, it depends on the frame. This fact creates problems: Granted that an entropy density tends to be concave, which one would that be? To my knowledge this question is unresolved. In this section we assume that there exists a privileged frame in which the entropy density is concave. And we choose the privileged frame such that symmetric hyperbolicity of the system of field equations is guaranteed. These considerations have been motivated by a paper by Ruggeri [42].
Symmetric hyperbolicity means finite characteristic speeds, not necessarily speeds smaller than the speed of light. However, for moments as fourfluxes it can be shown that all speeds are smaller or equal to c and that for infinitely many moments the pulse speed tends to c. Moreover, for moments the privileged frame is the rest frame of the gas, at least, if the gas is nondegenerate.
4.1 Concavity of a privileged entropy density
We recall the arguments of Section 2.2 concerning concavity in the relativistic case and choose the fields u to mean the privileged densities F_{̄ζ} = F^{A}̄ζ_{A}. The privileged entropy density is assumed by (5) to be concave with respect to the privileged fields F_{̄ζ}. The privileged covector ̄ζ_{A} will be chosen so that the concavity of h_{̄ζ} implies symmetric hyperbolicity of the field equations.
4.2 Symmetric hyperbolicity
It is true that in the relativistic case we have to rely on the privileged covector \({\bar \zeta ^A} =  \frac{{{{h'}^A}}}{{\sqrt {{{h'}^A}{{h'}_A}} }}\) in this context and therefore on a privileged Lorentz frame whose entropy density h_{̄ζ} is concave in F_{̄ζ}. The significance of this choice is not really understood. Indeed, we might have preferred the privileged frame to be the local rest frame of the body. In that respect it is reassuring that h′^{A} is often colinear to the fourvelocity U^{A} as we shall see in Section 4.3 below; but not always! A better understanding is needed.
Note that in the nonrelativistic case the only timelike covector is ζ_{A} = (1, 0, 0, 0), a constant vector. In that case all the abovementioned complications are absent: Concavity of the one and only entropy density h^{0} is equivalent to symmetric hyperbolicity, see Section 3 above.
4.3 Moments as fourfluxes and the vector potential
 p^{A} is now the Lorentz vector of atomic fourmomentum with p^{0} > 0 and p^{A}p_{A} = m^{2}c^{2}. Accordingly p_{α} now stands for polynomials in the components of fourmomentum. Thus instead of (27) we have$${p_\alpha } = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} 1\\ {p^{{B_1}}}\\ {p^{{B_1}}}{p^{{B_2}}}\\ \vdots \\ {p^{{B_1}}}{p^{{B_2}}} \ldots {p^{{B_N}}}. \end{array} \right.$$

The element dP of phase space is now equal to dp/p_{0} instead of dp.
Both are important differences. But many results from the nonrelativistic theory will remain formally valid.
We recall the discussion — in Section 4.2 — of the important role played by h′^{A} in ensuring symmetric hyperbolicity of the field equations: Symmetric hyperbolicity was due to the concavity of h_{̄ζ}(F_{̄ζ}) in the privileged frame moving with the fourvelocity \(c{\bar \zeta ^A} =  c\frac{{{{h'}^A}}}{{\sqrt {{{h'}_A}{{h'}^A}} }}\). Now we see from (72) that — for the nondegenerate gas — we have c̄ζ^{A} = U^{A} so that the privileged frame is the local rest frame of the gas. This is quite satisfactory, since the rest frame is naturally privileged. [There remains the question of why the rest frame is not the privileged one for a degenerate gas. This point is open and invites investigation.]
4.4 Upper and lower bounds for the pulse speed
[Recall that the requirement (65) of symmetric hyperbolicity did not require speeds ≤ c. I have discussed that point at the end of Section 4.2. Now, however, in extended thermodynamics of moments, because of the specific form of the vector potential, the condition (65) is satisfied for all covectors. Therefore all speeds are ≤ c.]
Therefore the pulse speeds of all moment theories are smaller than c, but they tend to c as the number of moments tends to infinity. This result compares well with the corresponding result in Section 3.6 concerning the nonrelativistic theory. In that case there was no upper bound so that the pulse speeds tended to infinity for extended thermodynamics of very many moments.
5 Relativistic Thermodynamics of Gases. 14Field Theory
While the synthetic treatment of the foregoing sections is concise and seems quite elegant, it is also little suggestive of the laws for heat flux and stress that we associate with nonequilibrium thermodynamics. Moreover, the elegance of this treatment disguises the fact that much work is needed in order to obtain specific results.
The following section highlights this situation by considering a viscous heatconducting gas, a material which is fully characterized by 14 fields, viz. the density and flux of mass, energy and momentum, and stress and heat flux. With this choice of fields we shall be able to exploit the principle of relativity and the entropy inequality in explicit form and to calculate some specific pulse speeds.
It is true that much of the rigorous formal structure of the preceding section is lost when it comes to specific calculations. Linearization around equilibrium cannot be avoided, if we wish to obtain specific results, and that destroys global invertibility and general symmetric hyperbolicity. These properties are now restricted to situations close to equilibrium.
5.1 Thermodynamic processes in viscous, heatconducting gases
It is clear upon reflection that this theory, based on (79, 80,81) and (84), provides a special case of the generic structure explained in Section 2.
5.2 Constitutive theory

entropy inequality h^{A}_{,A} ≥ 0 with h^{A} = ĥ^{A}(A^{M}, A^{MN}),

principle of relativity.

Â^{ABC} will be reduced to the thermal equation of state.

Î^{AB} will be reduced to the relaxation times of the gas, which may be considered to be of the order of magnitude of the mean time of free flight of its molecules.
For details of the calculation the reader is referred to the literature, in particular to the book by Müller & Ruggeri [39, 40] or the paper by Liu, Müller & Ruggeri [31]. Here we explain only the results.
5.3 Results of the constitutive theory
We have defined \({h^{AB}} = \frac{1}{{{c^2}}}{U^A}{U^B}  {g^{AB}}\) and m is the molecular rest mass.
The decomposition (86) is not only popular because of its intuitive quality but also, since it is now possible to characterize equilibrium as a process in which the stress deviator t^{〈AB〉} the heat flux q^{A} and the dynamic pressure π — the nonequilibrium part of the pressure — vanish.
5.4 The laws of Navier—Stokes and Fourier
These are the relativistic analogues of the classical phenomenological equations of NavierStokes and Fourier. λ, μ and κ are the bulk viscosity, the shear viscosity and the thermal conductivity respectively; all three of these transport coefficients are nonnegative by the entropy inequality.
The only essential difference between the equations (97, 98, 99) and the nonrelativistic phenomenological equations is the acceleration term in (99). This contribution to the Fourier law was first derived by Eckart, the founder of thermodynamics of irreversible processes. It implies that the temperature is not generally homogeneous in equilibrium. Thus for instance equilibrium of a gas in a gravitational field implies a temperature gradient, a result that antedates even Eckart.
We have emphasized that the field equations of extended thermodynamics should provide finite speeds. Below in Section 5.6 we shall give the values of the speeds for nondegenerate gases. In contrast TIP leads to parabolic equations whose fastest characteristic speeds are always infinite. Indeed, if the phenomenological equations (97, 98, 99) are introduced into the conservation laws (93, 94) of particle number, energy and momentum, we obtain a closed system of parabolic equations for n, U_{A} and e. This unwelcome feature results from the Maxwell iteration; it persists to arbitrarily high iterates.
5.5 Specific results for a nondegenerate relativistic gas
Note that λ, μ and κ are measurable, at least in principle, so that the B’s may be calculated from (105). Therefore it follows that the constitutive theory has led to specific results. All constitutive coefficients are now explicit: The C’s can be calculated from the thermal equation of state p = p(α, T) and the B’s may be measured.
It might seem from (106) and (97) that the dynamic pressure is of order \(O\left( {\frac{1}{{{\gamma ^2}}}} \right)\) but this is not so as was recently discovered by Kremer & Müller [27]. Indeed, the second step in the Maxwell iteration for it provides a term that is of order \(O\left( {\frac{1}{\gamma }} \right)\), see also [28]. That term is proportional to the second gradient of the temperature T so that it may be said to be due to heating or cooling.
Specific results of the type (104, 105) can also be calculated for degenerate gases with the thermal equation of state p(α, T) for such gases. That equation was also derived by Jüttner [23]. The results for 14 fields may be found in Müller & Ruggeri [39, 40].
5.6 Characteristic speeds in a viscous, heatconducting gas
5.7 Discussion
So as to anticipate a possible misunderstanding I remark that the equations (93, 94, 95) with A^{ABA} from (89) and (91) are neither symmetric nor fully hyperbolic. Indeed the underlying symmetry of the system (79, 80, 81), and (84) reveals itself only when the Lagrange multipliers Λ are used as variables. But (93, 94, 95, 89, 91) are equations for the physical variables A^{A}, A^{AB} or in fact n, T, U^{A}, t^{AB}, and q^{A}. Also the hyperbolicity in the whole state space is lost, because the equations (89, 90) are restricted to linear terms. Therefore the system is hyperbolic only in the neighbourhood of equilibrium. For a more detailed discussion of these aspects, see Müller & Ruggeri [39, 40].
Footnotes
 1.
lt is true that Maxwell [33, 34] had an equation of transfer for the heat flux with a rate term just as postulated by Cattaneo 80 years later; such an equation arises naturally in the kinetic theory of gases. However, on both occasions Maxwell summarily dismisses the term as being small and uninteresting. He was interested in deriving the proportionality of heat flux and temperature gradient, Fourier’s law. It is uncertain whether Maxwell was aware of the paradox. But, if he was, he did not care about it, at least not in the papers cited. It is conceivable that Maxwell, a prolific writer of letters as well as of papers, may have mentioned the paradox elsewhere. If so, the author of this review should like to learn about it.
 2.
Throughout this work we stick to Lorentz frames, so that the metric tensor g has only diagonal components with g_{00} = 1, g_{11} = g_{22} = g_{33} = 1.
 3.
If the reader does not recall this theorem, he is advised to recapitulate the part of linear algebra that deals with the simultaneous diagonalization of two symmetric matrices.
 4.
References
 [1]Boillat, G., “Sur l’existence et la recherche d’équations de conservation supplementaires pour les hyperbolique.”, C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. A, 278, (1974). 3.2Google Scholar
 [2]Boillat, G., “Wave velocities in relativistic extended thermodynamics”, in Müller, I., and Ruggeri, T., eds., Kinetic Theory and Extended Thermodynamics, Proceedings of the ISIMM Symposium, Bologna, May 18–20, 1987, (Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, 1987). 1Google Scholar
 [3]Boillat, G., and Ruggeri, T., “Maximum Wave Velocity of Degenerate and NonDegenerate Relativistic Gases”, in preparation. 1, 4.4Google Scholar
 [4]Boillat, G., and Ruggeri, T., “Hyperbolic Principal Subsystems: Entropy Convexity and Subcharacteristic Conditions”, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 137, 305–320, (1997). [DOI]. 1MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [5]Boillat, G., and Ruggeri, T., “Moment equations in the kinetic theory of gases and wave velocities”, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 9, 205–212, (1997). [DOI]. 1, 3.6ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [6]Boillat, G., and Ruggeri, T., “Maximum wave velocity in the moments system of a relativistic gas”, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 11, 107–111, (1999). [DOI]. 1, 4.4ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [7]Cattaneo, C., “Sulla conduzione del calore”, Atti Semin. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena, 3, (1948). 1Google Scholar
 [8]Cercignani, C., “Speed of propagation of infinitesimal disturbances in a relativistic gas”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 50, 1122–1124, (1983). [DOI]. 1ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [9]Cercignani, C., and Majorana, A., “Analysis of thermal and shear waves according to BKG kinetic model”, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 36, 699–711, (1985). [DOI]. 1MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [10]Chernikov, N.A., “The relativistic gas in the gravitational field”, Acta Phys. Pol., 23, 629–645, (1963). 4MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
 [11]Chernikov, N.A., “Equilibrium distribution of the relativistic gas”, Acta Phys. Pol., 26, 1069–1092, (1964). 4MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 [12]Chernikov, N.A., “Microscopic foundation of relativistic hydrodynamics”, Acta Phys. Pol., 27, 465–489, (1965). 4MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
 [13]de Groot, S.R., van Leeuwen, W.A., and van Weert, C.G., Relativistic Kinetic Theory: Principles and Applications, (NorthHolland; Elsevier, Amsterdam; New York, 1980). 4Google Scholar
 [14]Eckart, C., “The Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. I. The Simple Fluid”, Phys. Rev.,58, 267–269, (1940). [DOI]. 1ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [15]Eckart, C., “The Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. II. Fluid Mixtures”, Phys. Rev.,58, 269–275, (1940). [DOI]. 1ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [16]Eckart, C., “The Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. III. Relativistic Theory of the Simple Fluid”, Phys. Rev., 58, 919–924, (1940). [DOI]. 1ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [17]Friedrichs, K.O., “On the laws of relativistic electromagnetofluid dynamics”, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 27, 749–808, (1974). 4.2ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [18]Friedrichs, K.O., and Lax, P.D., “Systems of Conservation Equations with a Convex Extension”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 68, 1686–1688, (1971). [DOI]. 3.2ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [19]Godunov, S.K., “An interesting class of quasilinear systems”, Sov. Math. Dokl., 2, 947–949,(1961). 3.2zbMATHGoogle Scholar
 [20]Huang, K., Statistical Mechanics, (Wiley, New York, 1963). 3.4Google Scholar
 [21]Israel, W., “Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A causal relativistic theory”, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 100, 310–331, (1976). [DOI]. 1ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [22]Jüttner, F., “Das Maxwellsche Gesetz der Geschwindigkeitsverteilung in der Relativtheorie”, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 339, 856–882, (1911). [DOI]. 5.5ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [23]Jüttner, F., “Die relativistische Quantentheorie des idealen Gases”, Z. Phys., 47, 542–566,(1928). [DOI]. 5.5, 5.5ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [24]Kranys, M., “Phase and signal velocities of waves in dissipative media. Special relativistic theory”, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 48, 274–301, (1972). [DOI]. 1MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [25]Kremer, G.M., Zur erweiterten Thermodynamik idealer und dichter Gase, Ph.D. Thesis, (Technische Universitat, Berlin, 1985). 1Google Scholar
 [26]Kremer, G.M., “Extended thermodynamics of ideal gases with 14 fields”, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare A, 45, 419–440, (1986). Related online version (cited on 25 May 2009): http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1986__45_4_419_0. 1MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
 [27]Kremer, G.M., and Müller, I., “Dynamic pressure in relativistic thermodynamics”, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare A, 67, 111–121, (1997). 1997Related online version (cited on 25 May 2009): http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1997__67_2_111_0. 5.5MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
 [28]Kremer, G.M., and Müller, I., “Linearized Burnett equation for the dynamic pressure of a relativistic gas”, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 10, 49–53, (1998). [DOI]. 5.5ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [29]Lichnerowicz, A., and Marrot, R., “Propriétés statistiques des ensembles de particules en relativité restreinte”, C. R. Acad. Sci., 210, 759–761, (1940). 4MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
 [30]Liu, I.S., “Method of Lagrange multipliers for exploitation of the entropy principle”, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 46, 131–148, (1972). [DOI]. 2.3MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [31]Liu, I.S., Müller, I., and Ruggeri, T., “Relativistic thermodynamics of gases”, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 169, 191–219, (1986). [DOI]. 1, 5.2ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [32]Marle, C., “Sur l’établissement des équations de l’hydrodynamique des fluides relativistes dissipatifs. I. — L’équation de Boltzmann relativiste”, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare A, 10(1),67–126, (1969). Related online version (cited on 25 May 2009):http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1969__10_1_67_0. Part II: 10(2), 127194, 1969. 4MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 [33]Maxwell, J.C., “On the Dynamical Theory of Gases”, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, 157,49–88, (1867). [DOI]. 1Google Scholar
 [34]Maxwell, J.C., “On Stresses in Rarified Gases Arising from Inequalities of Temperaturerd,Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, 170, 231–256, (1879). [DOI]. 1ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [35]Müller, I., Zur Ausbreitungsgeschwindigkeit von Störungen in kontinuierlichen Medien, Ph.D. Thesis, (RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 1966). 1Google Scholar
 [36]Müller, I., “On the entropy inequality”, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 26, 118–141, (1967). [DOI]. 2.2MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [37]Müller, I., “Zum Paradoxon der Wärmeleitungstheorie”, Z. Phys., 198, 329–344, (1967). [DOI]. 1ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [38]Müller, I., “Toward relativistic thermodynamics”, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 34, 259–282,(1969). [DOI]. 2.2MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [39]Müller, I., and Ruggeri, T., Extended Thermodynamics, Springer Tracts in Natural Philosophy, vol. 37, (Springer, New York, 1993). 1, 5.2, 5.5, 5.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [40]Müller, I., and Ruggeri, T., Rational Extended Thermodynamics, Springer Tracts in Natural Philosophy, vol. 37, (Springer, New York, 1998), 2nd edition. 1, 5.2, 5.5, 5.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [41]Ruggeri, T., “Galilean invariance and entropy principle for systems of balance laws. The structure of extended thermodynamics”, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 1, 3–20, (1989). [DOI]. 1ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [42]Ruggeri, T., “Convexity and symmetrization in relativistic theories”, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 2, 163–177, (1990). 4ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [43]Ruggeri, T., and Strumia, A., “Main field and convex covariant density for quasilinear hyperbolic systems: Relativistic fluid dynamics”, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare A, 34, 65–84, (1981). Related online version (cited on 25 May 2009):http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1981__34_1_65_0. 1, 3.2MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
 [44]Seccia, L., and Strumia, A., “Wave propagation in relativistic extended thermodynamics”, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 2, 151–161, (1990). [DOI]. 1, 5.6ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [45]Sirovich, L., and Thurber, J.K., “Sound Propagation According to the Kinetic Theory of Gases”, in Laurman, J.A., ed., Rarefied Gas Dynamics, Vol. 1, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium, Paris 1962, p. 159, (Academic Press, New York, 1963). 1Google Scholar
 [46]Stewart, J.M., “On transient relativistic thermodynamics and kinetic theory”, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 357, 59–75, (1977). [DOI]. 1ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [47]Struchtrup, H., “An Extended Moment Method in Radiative Transfer: The Matrices of Mean Absorption and Scattering Coefficients”, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 257, 111–135, (1997). [DOI]. 1ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [48]Wang Chang, C.S., and Uhlenbeck, G.E., “The Kinetic Theory of Gases”, in De Boer, J., and G.E., Uhlenbeck, eds., The Kinetic Theory of Gases. The dispersion of sound in monoatomic gases, Studies in Statistical Mechanics, vol. 5, (NorthHolland, Amsterdam, 1970)Google Scholar
 [49]Weiss, W., Zur Hierarchie der Erweiterten Thermodynamik, Ph.D. Thesis, (Technische Universitaut, Berlin, 1990). 1, 3.5Google Scholar
 [50]Weiss, W., “Continuous shock structure in extended thermodynamics”, Phys. Rev. E, 52,R5760–R5763, (1995). [DOI]. 1ai][51]_Weiss, W., and Müller, I., “Light scattering and extended thermodynamics”, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 7, 123–177, (1995). [DOI]. 1ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 [51]Weiss, W., and Müller, I., “Light scattering and extended thermodynamics”, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 7, 123–177, (1995). [DOI]. 1ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.