Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors affecting the appearance of ‘twin language’: An original language naturally developing within twin pairs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Objectives

The appearance of ‘twin language’ has been highlighted as a reason for delayed language development in twins. ‘Twin language’ is a unique language understandable only within the pair, and not by their mother or others. The purpose of this study was to examine and clarify the factors affecting the appearance of ‘twin language’.

Methods

A mailed questionnaires survey was conducted in 2733 mothers of twins. Of them, 1395 mothers returned the questionnaires. The core questionnaire asked for data on birth weight, age at first spoken word, whether the twins were as alike as two peas in a pod, household members and non-verbal play. Logistic regression analysis was used in this study.

Results

Out of the 1395 pairs included in this analysis, 598 pairs (42.9%) showed the appearance of a ‘twin language’. When the 598 pairs were divided by whether the twin pair was exactly alike or not, there were 112 opposite sex pairs, 105 not-alike male pairs, 106 not-alike female pairs, 129 exactly alike male pairs and 140 exactly alike female pairs. Namely, 38.4% of the opposite sex pairs, 40.4% of the not-alike male pairs, 39.3% of the not-alike female pairs, 47.6% of the exactly alike male pairs and 48.4% in the exactly alike female pairs had a twin language. By multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for twins’ age, it was found that ‘twin language’ was significantly more frequent in exactly alike twin pairs, pairs with non-verbal play, and pairs with fewer older siblings.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that three factors (whether the twin pair is exactly alike or not, older siblings, non-verbal play) affect the appearance of ‘twin language’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Day EJ. The development of language in twins. Child Dev. 1932; 3: 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Savic S. How twins learn to talk. New York: Academic Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McKeown T, Record R. Observations of foetal growth in multiple pregnancies in man. J Endocrinol. 1952; 8: 386–401.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bornstein M, Ruddy M. Infant attention and maternal stimulation: Prediction of cognitive and linguistic development in singletons and twins. In H. Bouma, D. Douwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. London, Erlbaun, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tomasello M, Mannle S, Kruger AC. Linguistic environment of 1- to 2-year-old twins. Dev Psychol. 1986; 22(2): 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lytton H, Conway D, Sauve R. The impact of twinship on parent-child interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977; 35(2): 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Conway D, Lytton H, Pysh F. Twin-singleton language differences. Can J Behav Sci. 1980; 12: 264–271.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wells G. Learning through interaction: The study of language development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thorpe K, Greenwood R, Eivers A, Rutter M. Prevalence and developmental course of ‘secret language’. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001; 36(1): 43–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mittler P. Biological and social aspects of language development in twins. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1970; 12: 741–757.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Birmingham Alabama. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertility and Sterility. 2002; 77(1): 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S.K. Kalra, M.P. Milad, S.C. Klock and W.A. Grobman. Infertility Patients and Their Partners: Differences in the Desire for Twin Gestations. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2003; 102(1) 152–155.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Komori S, Kasumi H, Horiuchi I, Hamada Y, Suzuki C, Shigeta M and Koyama K. Prevention of multiple pregnancies by restricting the number of transferred embryos: randomized control study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2003; Springer-Verlag.

  14. Hayashi A, Deguchi T, Tamekawa Y, Kiritani S. Developmental change in prefential listening responses for prosodic patterns of speech stimuli in 4-to 14-month-old: perception of prosodic cues to clausal units. Annual Research Reports of Tokyo Gakugei University. The Research Institute for Education of Exceptional Children. 1997; 87–94.

  15. SPSS Base 11.0 User’s Gudie. Copyright 2001 by SPSS Inc.

  16. Ooki S, Yamada K, Asaka K, Hayakawa K. Zygosity diagnosis of twins by a questionnaire. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1990; 39: 109–115.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ooki S, Yamada K, Asaka A, Hayakawa K, Shimizu T. Zygosity diagnosis of twins by questionnaire. Minzokueisei. 1989; 55: 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hayakawa K, Simizu T, Kanemitsu Y. Zygosity diagnosis of twins by questionnaire in middle age. Jpn J Pub Health. 1985. 33, 340–344 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bishop DVM, Bishop SJ. ‘Twin language’: A risk factor for language impairment? J Speech Hear Res. 1998; 41(1): 150–160.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bishop DVM, Delaney T et al. Different origin of auditory and phonological processing problems in child with language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. J Speech Hear Res. 1999; 42: 142–154.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Price TS, Eley TC, Dale PS, Stevenson J, Saudino K, Plomin R. Genetic and environmental covariation between verbal and nonverbal cognitive development in infancy. Child Dev. 2000; 71(4): 948–959.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meaburn E, Dale PS, Craig IW, Plomin R. Language impaired children; No sign of the FOXP2 mutation. Neuroreport. 2002; 1075–1077.

  23. Colledge E, Bishop DVM, Schomerus GK, Price TS, Dale PS, Plomin R. The structure of language abilities at 4 years. A twin study. Dev Psychol. 2002; 38(5): 749–757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dale PS, Simonoff E, Bishop DVM, Eley TC, Oliver B, Price TS et al. Genetic influence on language delay in two-year-old children. Nat Neurosci. 1998; 1(4): 324–328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bakker P. Autonomous languages of twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1987; 36(2): 233–238.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Price TS, Eley TC, Dale PS, Stevenson J, Saudino K, Plomin R. Genetic and environmental covariation between verbal and nonverbal cognitive development in infancy. Child Dev. 2000; 71(4): 948–959.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Colledge E, Bishop DVM, Schomerus GK, Price TS, Dale PS, Plomin R. The structure of language abilities at 4 years. A twin study. Dev Psychol. 2002; 38(5): 749–757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lenneberg E H. Biological foundations of language. 1967. New York.

  29. Hanna E, Meltzoff AN. Peer imitation by toddlers in laboratory, home, and day-care contexts: Implications for social learning and memory. Dev Psychol. 1993; 29: 701–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Meltzoff A N. Immediate and deferred imitation in fourteen- and twenty-four-month-old infants. Child Dev. 1985; 56: 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meltzoff A N, Moore M K. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science. 1977; 198: 75–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Meltzoff A N, Moore M K. Imitation in newborn infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Dev Psychol. 1989; 25: 954–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Piaget J. Play, dreams, and imitation. New York: Norton, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bates E, Dick F. Language Gesture, and the Developing Brain. Dev Psychobiol. 2002; 40: 293–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Promotion Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7 Yamadaoka, 565-0871, Suita City, Osaka, Japan

    Chisato Hayashi & Kazuo Hayakawa

Authors
  1. Chisato Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kazuo Hayakawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chisato Hayashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayashi, C., Hayakawa, K. Factors affecting the appearance of ‘twin language’: An original language naturally developing within twin pairs. Environ Health Prev Med 9, 103–110 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.9.103

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.9.103

Keywords

Search

Navigation