Biological Procedures Online

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 108–115 | Cite as

Measuring solution viscosity and its effect on enzyme activity

Open Access


In proteins, some processes require conformational changes involving structural domain diffusion. Among these processes are protein folding, unfolding and enzyme catalysis. During catalysis some enzymes undergo large conformational changes as they progress through the catalytic cycle. According to Kramers theory, solvent viscosity results in friction against proteins in solution, and this should result in decreased motion, inhibiting catalysis in motile enzymes. Solution viscosity was increased by adding increasing concentrations of glycerol, sucrose and trehalose, resulting in a decrease in the reaction rate of the H+-ATPase from the plasma membrane ofKluyveromyces lactis. A direct correlation was found between viscosity (η) and the inhibition of the maximum rate of catalysis (Vmax). The protocol used to measure viscosity by means of a falling ball type viscometer is described, together with the determination of enzyme kinetics and the application of Kramers’ equation to evaluate the effect of viscosity on the rate of ATP hydrolysis by the H+-ATPase.

Indexing terms

Viscosity Trehalose 



Ethylene glycol-bis(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′,-tetraacetic acid


Piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)




Sodium-dodecyl-sulphate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis




  1. 1.
    Jacob M, Schmid FX. Protein folding as a diffusional process.Biochemistry 1999; 38:13773–13779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kramers HA. Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions.Physica 1940; 7:284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jacob M, Geeves M, Holterman G, Schmid FX. Diffusional crossing in a two-state protein folding reaction.Nature Struc Biol 1999; 6:923–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Demchenko AP, Ruskyn OI, Saburova EA. Kinetics of the lactate dehydrogenase reaction in high-viscosity media.Biochim Biophys Acta 1989; 998: 196–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang X, Beuron F, Freemont PS. Machinery of protein folding and unfolding.Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002; 12:231–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frauenfelder H, Parak F, Young RD. Conformational substates in proteins.Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1988; 17:451–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Mierlo CP, Steensma E. Protein folding and stability investigated by fluorescence, circular dichroism (CD), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy: the flavodoxin story.J Biotechnol 2000; 79:281–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cordone L, Galajda P, Vitrano E, Gassmann A, Ostermann A, Parak F. A reduction of protein specific motions in co-ligated myoglobin embedded in a trehalose glass.Eur Biophys J 1998; 27:173–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Toyoshima C, Takasako M, Nomura H, Ogawa H. Crystal structure of the calcium pump of sarcoplasmic reticulum at 2.6 Å resolution.Nature 2000; 405:647–655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nakamoto RK, Slayman CW. Molecular properties of the fungal plasma-membrane H+-ATPase.J Bioenerg Biomembr 1989; 21:621–632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sampedro JG, Muñoz-Clares RA, Uribe S. Trehalosemediated inhibition of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase fromKluyveromyces lactis: dependence on viscosity and temperature.J Bacteriol 2002; 184:4384–4391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bowman BJ, Slayman CW. The effects of vanadate on the plasma membrane ATPase ofNeurospora crassa.J Biol Chem 1979; 254:2928–2934.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guerra G, Uribe S, Pardo JP. Reactivity of the H+-ATPase fromKluyveromyces lactis to sulfhydryl reagents.Arch Biochem Biophys 1995; 321:101–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent.J Biol Chem 1951; 193:265–275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson KW, Murphy AJ. Alterations in the structure of the ribose moiety of ATP reduce its effectiveness as a substrate for the sarcoplasmic reticulum ATPase.J Biol Chem 1983; 258:14276–14278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rampp M, Buttersack C, Ludemann HD. c,T-dependence of the viscosity and the self-diffusion coefficients in some aqueous carbohydrate solutions.Carbohydr Res 2000; 328:561–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colombo MF, Rau DC, Parsegian A. Protein solvation in allosteric regulation:a water effect on hemoglobin.Science 1992; 256:655–659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sweet W, Blanchard JS. Fumarase:viscosity dependence of the kinetics parameters.Arch Biochem Biophys 1990; 277:196–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pocker Y, Janjic N. Enzyme kinetics in solvent of increased viscosity. Dynamic aspects of carbonic anhydrase catalysis.Biochemistry 1990; 26:2597–2606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Timasheff SN. The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: How do these solvents affects these process.Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1993; 22:67–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Área Académica de Nutrición, Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud ICSAUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (UAEH)HidalgoMexico
  2. 2.Departamento de BioquÍmica, Instituto de FisiologÍa CelularUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)Mexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations