Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

ASO Author Reflections: Lymph Node Station 16 Status—Becoming a Student of Your Patients’ Cancer

  • ASO Author Reflections
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Blomstrand H, Olsson H, Green H, Björnsson B, Elander NO. Impact of resection 74 margins and para-aortic lymph node metastases on recurrence patterns and 75 prognosis in resectable pancreatic cancer—a long-term population-based cohort 76 study. HPB. 2023;25(12):1531–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawahara W, Vega EA, Salehi O, et al. Laparoscopic dissection of lymph node station 16—Why and how? Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15040-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vega EA, Vinuela E, Yamashita S, et al. Extended lymphadenectomy is required for incidental gallbladder cancer independent of cystic duct lymph node status. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(1):43–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vega EA, Kutlu OC, Salehi O, et al. The impact of chemotherapy sequencing on resectable pancreatic cancer by stage. Surg Oncol. 2022;40:101694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Salehi O, Vega EA, Mellado S, et al. High-quality surgery for gallbladder carcinoma: rare, associated with disparity, and not substitutable by chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022;26(6):1241–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeh K, Sharma I, Falahkheirkhah K, et al. Infrared spectroscopic laser scanning confocal microscopy for whole-slide chemical imaging. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):5215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Falahkheirkhah K, Mukherjee SS, Gupta S, et al. Accelerating cancer histopathology workflows with chemical imaging and machine learning. Cancer Res Commun. 2023;3(9):1875–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudius Conrad MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

None of the authors have declared any conflict of interest. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article refers to: Kawahara W, Vega EA, Salehi O, et al. Laparoscopic Dissection of Lymph Node Station 16 – Why and How? Ann Surg Oncol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15040-2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salirrosas, O., Kawahara, W., Vega, E.A. et al. ASO Author Reflections: Lymph Node Station 16 Status—Becoming a Student of Your Patients’ Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 31, 3031–3032 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15099-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15099-x

Navigation