Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Observational Cohort Study Comparing Positive Margin Rates Using an Electromagnetic Navigational System Versus Wire Localization in Breast Conservation Surgery

  • ASO Research Letter
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Zhang Y, Seely J, Cordeiro E, et al. Radioactive seed localization versus wire-guided localization for nonpalpable breast cancer: a cost and operating room efficiency analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(12):3567–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cox CE, Russell S, Prowler V, et al. A prospective, single arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of a nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for the location of nonpalpable breast lesions during excision. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3168–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly BN, Webster AJ, Lamb L, et al. Magnetic seeds: an alternative to wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22(5):e700–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Srour MK, Kim S, Amersi F, Giuliano AE, Chung A. Comparison of wire localization, radioactive seed, and Savi scout radar for management of surgical breast disease. Breast J. 2020;26(3):406–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamb LR, Gilman L, Specht M, D’Alessandro HA, Miles RC, Lehman CD. Retrospective review of preoperative radiofrequency tag localization of breast lesions in 848 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;217(3):605–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cullinane CM, Byrne J, Akmenkalne L, et al. The localizer radiofrequency identification system: an effective new technology for localizing non-palpable breast lesions for surgery. Surg Innov. 2021;28(4):473–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorena Gonzalez MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Lorena Gonzalez, Natalie C. Johnson, Veronica C. Jones, Lesley Taylor, Jamie Rand, Yuman Fong, and Laura Kruper confirm they have no commercial interests or financial disclosures relevant to this manuscript. Laura Kruper became a compensated consultant/speaker for EnVisio in July 2023 after this study was performed, analyzed, and presented. She did not have any relations with Elucent during this project.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonzalez, L., Johnson, N.C., Jones, V.C. et al. An Observational Cohort Study Comparing Positive Margin Rates Using an Electromagnetic Navigational System Versus Wire Localization in Breast Conservation Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 31, 3669–3671 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15028-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15028-y

Navigation