Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparison of Clinicopathologic Outcomes and Patterns of Lymphatic Spread Across Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, and Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is recommended as the treatment standard for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The use of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting has gained attention. Multiple, clinical trials have explored the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT). We evaluated the differences in clinicopathologic outcomes and the patterns of lymphatic spread among patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), NCRT, and NICT before esophagectomy for locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

A total of 702 patients with ESCC who completed transthoracic esophagectomy followed neoadjuvant therapy were included. Pathological characteristics, including pathologic complete response (pCR), tumor regression grade (TRG) score and patterns of lymphatic spread, were evaluated.

Results

Compared with the NCT group, the NCRT group and NICT group had an advantage in pathological response (P < 0.05). The pCR rate was 8.1% in the NCT group, 29.9% in the NCRT group, and 23.6% in the NICT group. The TRG score (P < 0.05) and pathologic T stage (P < 0.05) in the NCT group were significantly higher. Compared with NICT, NCRT can significantly reduce the rate of lymph node metastasis rate in station 1R (0 vs. 3.4%, P < 0.05) and 2R (1.1% vs. 6.8%, P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis according to the tumor location distribution showed that NICT group had higher lymph node metastasis rate in station 2R (9.1%) in middle thoracic cases (P < 0.05) and in station 18 (7.5%) (P < 0.05) in lower thoracic cases.

Conclusions

NCRT or NICT followed by surgery may result in a promising pCR rate and show a better performance in therapeutic response of primary lesion. For patients with lymph node metastasis in station 1R and 2R, NCRT should be the optimal preoperative treatment strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).

References

  1. Ajani JA, D’amico TA, Bentrem DJ, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2019, nccn clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17:855–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA, Luketich JD. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet. 2013;381:400–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abnet CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:360–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Siewert JR, Ott K. Are squamous and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus the same disease? Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007;17:38–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Allum WH, Stenning SP, Bancewicz J, Clark PI, Langley RE. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5062–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelsen DP, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, et al. Long-term results of rtog trial 8911 (USA intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3719–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shapiro J, Van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (cross): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe M, Otake R, Kozuki R, et al. Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2020;50:12–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Ando N, Kitagawa Y. Current advancement in multidisciplinary treatment for resectable cstage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Japan. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;22:275–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (jcog9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2049-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura K, Kato K, Igaki H, et al. Three-arm phase iii trial comparing cisplatin plus 5-FU (CF) versus docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-FU (DCF) versus radiotherapy with CF (CF-RT) as preoperative therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer (jcog1109, next study). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43:752–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qiao Y, Zhao C, Li X, et al. Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for escc and its impact on esophagectomy. Front Immunol. 2022;13:953229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Z, Ye J, Li H, et al. Neoadjuvant sintilimab and chemotherapy in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1031171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan X, Duan H, Ni Y, et al. Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for surgically resectable esophageal cancer: a prospective, single-arm, phase II study (TD-nice). Int J Surg. 2022;103:106680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang P, Zhou X, Yang X, et al. Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in treating locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a pilot study. World J Surg Oncol. 2021;19:333.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Hofstetter WL, et al. Recommendations for pathologic staging (ptnm) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition ajcc/uicc staging manuals. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:897–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oppedijk V, Van Der Gaast A, Van Lanschot JJ, et al. Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the cross trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meguid RA, Hooker CM, Taylor JT, et al. Recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery for esophageal cancer: Does the pattern of recurrence differ for patients with complete response and those with partial or no response? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:1309–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Schroeder W, Ghadimi MPH, Schloesser H, et al. Long-term outcome after histopathological complete response with and without nodal metastases following multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(7):4419–28. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11700-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ide H, Nakamura T, Hayashi K, et al. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: pathology and prognosis. World J Surg. 1994;18:321–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, Triboulet JP. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Ann Surg. 2008;247:365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanabe G, Baba M, Kuroshima K, et al. Clinical evaluation of the esophageal lymph flow system based on RI uptake of dissected regional lymph nodes following lymphoscintigraphy. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1986;87:315–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China N. National guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of esophageal carcinoma in China (english version). Chin J Cancer Res. 2022;2022(34):309–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rice TW, Patil DT, Blackstone EH. 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6:119–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Duan H, Shao C, Pan M, et al. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in resectable esophageal cancer: an open-label, single-arm study (PEN-ICE). Front Immunol. 2022;13:849984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Verlato G, Zanoni A, Tomezzoli A, et al. Response to induction therapy in oesophageal and cardia carcinoma using mandard tumour regression grade or size of residual foci. Br J Surg. 2010;97:719–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chirieac LR, Swisher SG, Ajani JA, et al. Posttherapy pathologic stage predicts survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiation. Cancer. 2005;103:1347–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Akutsu Y, Kato K, Igaki H, et al. The prevalence of overall and initial lymph node metastases in clinical T1N0 thoracic esophageal cancer: from the results of jcog0502, a prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2016;264:1009–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (neocrtec5010): a phase III multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2796–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group. Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1727–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Darnton SJ, Archer VR, Stocken DD, et al. Preoperative mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin followed by esophagectomy in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: pathologic complete response induced by chemotherapy leads to long-term survival. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4009–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Malthaner RA, Collin S, Fenlon D. Preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;Cd001556.

  33. Samson P, Robinson C, Bradley J, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiation prior to esophagectomy: impact on rate of complete pathologic response and survival in esophageal cancer patients. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:2227–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang W, Xing X, Yeung SJ, et al. Neoadjuvant programmed cell death 1 blockade combined with chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10.

  35. Oguma J, Ozawa S, Koyanagi K, et al. Prognostic significance of pathological tumor response and residual nodal metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Esophagus. 2019;16:395–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Klevebro F, Alexandersson Von Döbeln G, Wang N, et al. A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:660–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K. Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology. 1991;48:411–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen J, Liu S, Pan J, et al. The pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:480–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Koen Talsma A, Shapiro J, Looman CW, et al. Lymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: prognostic and therapeutic impact on survival. Ann Surg. 2014;260:786–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Evans RP, Kamarajah SK, Kunene V, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on nodal regression and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022;48:1001–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu L, Wei XF, Li CJ, et al. Pathologic responses and surgical outcomes after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1052542.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, Blackstone EH, Goldstraw P. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: an eighth edition staging primer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank thoracic surgeon (Prof. Ganjun Kang), pathologist (Prof. Jingping Yuan), and radiologist (Prof. Jun Chen) for their suggestions to the revised manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yaowen Zhang MD or Yongshun Chen MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 77 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, Y., Shi, Z., Wang, C. et al. A Comparison of Clinicopathologic Outcomes and Patterns of Lymphatic Spread Across Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, and Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 31, 860–871 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14534-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14534-9

Keywords

Navigation