Skip to main content
Log in

Is it Time for Synoptic Reporting in Melanoma Nodal Surveillance Ultrasonography?

  • ASO Research Letter
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Completion dissection or observation for sentinel-node metastasis in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2211–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Broman KK, Hughes T, Dossett L, et al. Active surveillance of patients who have sentinel node positive melanoma: An international, multi-institution evaluation of adoption and early outcomes after the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-2). Cancer. 2021;127(13):2251–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33483.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mott NM, Duncan ZN, Pesavento CM, et al. Implementation of melanoma guidelines in the multidisciplinary setting: a qualitative analysis. Am J Surg. 2023;225(2):335–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rhodin KE, Farrow NE, Xu M, Lee J, Tyler DS, Beasley GM. National trends in management of pathologic stage III melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(5):2586–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13101-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharon CE, Straker RJ, Li EH, Karakousis GC, Miura JT. National practice patterns in the management of the regional lymph node basin after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(13):8456–64. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12364-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Montgomery KB, Correya TA, Broman KK. Real-world adherence to nodal surveillance for sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(9):5961–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11839-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Grant support was provided to KBM by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality under grant T32 HS013852; to AMH by the American College of Surgeons Clowes Award and the Department of Defense through the Melanoma Academy Scholar Program; and to KKB from the American College of Surgeons, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the National Institutes of Health on grant KL2 TR003097.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelsey B. Montgomery MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Kelsey B. Montgomery, Ashley M. Holder, Constantine M. Burgan, Samuel J. Galgano, and Kristy K. Broman have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was accepted as an ePoster at the Society of Surgical Oncology International Conference on Cancer Care, Boston, MA, USA, 23 March 2023.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montgomery, K.B., Holder, A.M., Burgan, C.M. et al. Is it Time for Synoptic Reporting in Melanoma Nodal Surveillance Ultrasonography?. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 5327–5328 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13749-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13749-0

Navigation