Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this retrospective study was to define the pattern of lymph nodal metastases in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by esophagectomy and to evaluate its influence on prognosis.
Methods
A total of 398 patients with clinical stage T3N0 or T1-3N+ ESCC who underwent NCT and radical esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy were included. The distribution and frequency of metastases were counted separately for each lymph node station. The ypN stage, number of positive lymph node stations and lymph node stations with a metastasis rate greater than 5% were analyzed by using univariate Cox regression, followed by separate multivariable Cox regression analyses after adjusting for various clinical factors.
Results
Lymph node metastases were most frequently observed in the right upper paratracheal (16.8%) and left gastric artery (13.1%) stations. Multivariable models controlling for clinical factors showed that ypN stage remained a significant independent predictor of survival (N1 vs. N0: hazard ratio [HR], 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38–3.83, P < 0.001; N2 vs. N0: HR, 3.76, 95% CI 2.21–6.38, P < 0.001; N3 vs. N0: HR, 7.14, 95% CI 3.78–13.48, P < 0.001). The model from the multivariable analysis with the highest c-index score, indicating superior discriminatory preference, was ypN stage (c-index, 0.72).
Conclusions
The pattern and influence of lymph node metastases after NCT will provide guidance on the extent of lymphadenectomy. Common positive lymph node stations for thoracic ESCC after NCT include the paratracheal, subcarinal, paraesophageal, paracardial, and left gastric artery stations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wei W, Zeng H, Zheng R, et al. Cancer registration in china and its role in cancer prevention and control. The Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(7):e342–9.
Tran GD, Sun XD, Abnet CC, et al. Prospective study of risk factors for esophageal and gastric cancers in the linxian general population trial cohort in china. Int J Cancer. 2005;113(3):456–63.
van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. The New England J Med. 2012;366(22):2074–84.
Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (jcog9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):68–74.
Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (neocrtec5010): a phase iii multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(27):2796–803.
Koen TA, Shapiro J, Looman CW, et al. Lymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: prognostic and therapeutic impact on survival. Ann Surg. 2014;260(5):786–92 (discussion 792-783).
Leng X, He W, Yang H, et al. Prognostic impact of postoperative lymph node metastases after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus: from the results of neocrtec5010, a randomized multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2021;274(6):e1022–9.
Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, Blackstone EH, Goldstraw P. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction an eighth staging primer. J Thor Oncol. 2017;12(1):36–42.
Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.
Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC, et al. Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer. 1994;73(11):2680–6.
Chirieac LR, Swisher SG, Ajani JA, et al. Posttherapy pathologic stage predicts survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiation. Cancer. 2005;103(7):1347–55.
Fujita H, Sueyoshi S, Tanaka T, et al. Optimal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus: Comparing the short- and long-term outcome among the four types of lymphadenectomy. World J Surg. 2003;27(5):571–9.
Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma-2nd english edition. Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Japanese Gastric Cancer Assoc 1998;1(1):10-24.
Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1995;82(3):346–51.
Kurokawa Y, Takeuchi H, Doki Y, et al. Mapping of lymph node metastasis from esophagogastric junction tumors: a prospective nationwide multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2021;274(1):120–7.
Castoro C, Scarpa M, Cagol M, et al. Nodal metastasis from locally advanced esophageal cancer: how neoadjuvant therapy modifies their frequency and distribution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(13):3743–54.
Hamai Y, Emi M, Ibuki Y, et al. Distribution of lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after trimodal therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(3):1798–807.
Nakamura K, Kato K, Igaki H, et al. Three-arm phase iii trial comparing cisplatin plus 5-fu (cf) versus docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fu (dcf) versus radiotherapy with cf (cf-rt) as preoperative therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer (jcog1109, next study). Jap J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(7):752–5.
Harrington CA, Carr RA, Hsu M, et al. Patterns and influence of nodal metastases after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and r0 resection in esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;164(2):411–9.
Yang Y, Li Y, Qin J, et al. Mapping of lymph node metastasis from thoracic esophageal cancer: a retrospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(9):5681–8.
Hagens ERC, Künzli HT, van Rijswijk AS, et al. Distribution of lymph node metastases in esophageal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: a prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(10):4347–57.
Hagens ERC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Sandick JW, et al. Distribution of lymph node metastases in esophageal carcinoma [tiger study]: study protocol of a multinational observational study. BMC cancer. 2019;19(1):662.
Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 22019, nccn clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2019;17(7):855–83.
Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. New England J Med. 2021;384(13):1191–203.
Health Commission of The People's Republic of China N. National guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of esophageal carcinoma 2022 in china (english version). Chin J Cancer Res 2022;34(4):309-334.
Funding
This study was funded by the Province-Ministry Co-construction Project of Health Committee of Henan Province (SB201901108), Youth Talent Project of Henan Youth Health Science and Technology Innovation Foundation (YXKC2020022) and Key Scientific and Technological Project of Science and Technology Department of Henan Provincial (222102310170).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, HB., Jiang, D., Liu, XB. et al. Patterns and Influence of Lymph Nodal Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 5205–5212 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13634-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13634-w