Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early and Persistent Dysphagia Relief Predicts Tumor Response in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Immunochemotherapy

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In this prospective study, we aimed to investigate the role of patient-reported dysphagia relief in predicting pathological tumor responses to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.

Methods

This study was designed as a multi-center, prospective study including ESCC patients who received NAIC in the discovery and validation cohorts. The patients’ responses to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-OES 18 and QLQ-C30 were collected at multiple time points. Subsequent time point-intensive esophageal cancer-specific dysphagia trajectories were depicted using growth mixture modeling (GMM) analysis. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression was used to assess the independent predictors for pathological tumor responses.

Results

A total of 120 patients from the discovery cohort and 42 patients from the validation cohort were included in the analysis. In the discovery cohort, 19 (22.9%) of the 83 patients achieved pCR status. In the independent validation cohort, 24 patients underwent surgery, and 9 (37.5%) patients achieved pCR status. Trajectory analysis showed that, in the pCR group, the beginning of rapid declines in the slope occurred on days 3, 6, and 9. Further multivariate analysis showed that the degree of dysphagia relief (△dysphagia%) was the only significant independent predictor for pCR status (OR = 3.267, 95% CI 1.66–6.428, P < 0.001). The AUC value for △dysphagia% was 0.961 (95% CI: 0.922–0.999, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The current study demonstrated that a longitudinal patient-reported outcome (PRO) was an easily obtained, cost-effective, and noninvasive tool for predicting tumor responses to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.

References

  1. van den Ende T, Clercq N, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with atezolizumab for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: a single arm phase II feasibility trial (PERFECT). Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:3351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li C, Zhao S, Zheng Y, et al. Preoperative pembrolizumab combined with chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (PALACE-1). Eur J Cancer. Feb2021;144:232–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu J, Li J, Lin W, et al. Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NIC-ESCC2019): a multicenter, phase 2 study. Int J Cancer. 2022;151:128–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang W, Xing X, Yeung SJ, et al. Neoadjuvant programmed cell death 1 blockade combined with chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10(1):e003497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yan X, Duan H, Ni Y, et al. Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for surgically resectable esophageal cancer: a prospective, single-arm, phase II study (TD-NICE). Int J Surg. 2022;103:106680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu J, Yang Y, Liu Z, et al. Multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial of camrelizumab and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10(3):e004291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Shang X, Zhang C, Zhao G, et al. LBA3 Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced resectable (stage III) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Keystone-001): interim analysis of a prospective, single-arm, single-center, phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:S1428–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamashita K, Katada N, Moriya H, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of triplet regimens of docetaxel/cisplatin/5-FU (DCF NAC) may improve patient prognosis of cStage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-propensity score analysis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64(4):209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(10):1384–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guidance for industry. patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hopkins AM, Wagner J, Kichenadasse G, Modi N, Rowland A, Sorich MJ. Patient-reported outcomes as a prognostic marker of survival in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy. Int J Cancer. 2020;147(11):3085–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Badaoui S, Kichenadasse G, Rowland A, Sorich MJ, Hopkins AM. Patient-reported outcomes predict progression-free survival of patients with advanced breast cancer treated with abemaciclib. Oncologist. 2021;26(7):562–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Basch E, Deal AM, Dueck AC, et al. Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. Jama. 2017;318(2):197–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, et al. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):1480–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sunde B, Ericson J, Kumagai K, et al. Relief of dysphagia during neoadjuvant treatment for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29(5):442–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sunde B, Johnsen G, Jacobsen AB, et al. Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy alone on the relief of dysphagia in esophageal cancer patients: secondary endpoint analysis in a randomized trial. Dis Esophagus. 2019;32(2):678. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ribi K, Koeberle D, Schuller JC, et al. Is a change in patient-reported dysphagia after induction chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer a predictive factor for pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation? Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(8):1109–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng Y, Li Y, Qin J, et al. Dysphagia predict the response to second cycle neoadjuvant chemotherapy in first cycle no response esophageal carcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(10):4135–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The european organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah MA, Kojima T, Hochhauser D, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for heavily pretreated patients with advanced, metastatic adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: the phase 2 KEYNOTE-180 study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(4):546–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chau I, Penel N, Soriano AO, et al. Ramucirumab in combination with pembrolizumab in treatment-naïve advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma: safety and antitumor activity from the phase 1a/b JVDF trial. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(10):2985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang S, Wu H, Cheng C, et al. Conversion surgery following immunochemotherapy in initially unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma—a real-world multicenter study (RICE-Retro). Front Immunol. 2022;13:678. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.935374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ram N, Grimm KJ. Growth mixture modeling: a method for identifying differences in longitudinal change among unobserved groups. Int J Behav Dev. 2009;33(6):565–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Auld JP, Thompson EA, Dougherty CM. Profiles of partner health linked to a partner-focused intervention following patient initial implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). J Behav Med. 2021;44(5):630–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin F, Chen DG, Vance DE, Ball KK, Mapstone M. Longitudinal relationships between subjective fatigue, cognitive function, and everyday functioning in old age. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(2):275–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwong ASF, López-López JA, Hammerton G, et al. Genetic and environmental risk factors associated with trajectories of depression symptoms from adolescence to Young Adulthood. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6):e196587.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lövgren M, Gustavsson P, Melin B, Rudman A. Neck/shoulder and back pain in new graduate nurses: a growth mixture modeling analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(4):625–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee JY, Walton DM, Tremblay P, et al. Defining pain and interference recovery trajectories after acute non-catastrophic musculoskeletal trauma through growth mixture modeling. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):615.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Muthén LK BO. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer program]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

  32. Rommel N, Hamdy S. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(1):49–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lagergren J, Smyth E, Cunningham D, Lagergren P. Oesophageal cancer. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2383–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers (version 1). 2022. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/esophageal.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the 2020–2021 Popularization of Science and Technology Innovation Special Project of Guangdong Province of China (2020A1414070007); the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (202206010103); and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2022A1515012469).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SH, YT & HW: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. QS: Statistical analysis consultation; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. JT, XB, DZ, LX, HZ, GC, SW & ZG: Software; Validation; Visualization; Investigation; Methodology; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. RC & GQ: Funding acquisition; Project administration; Resources; Supervision; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rixin Chen PhD or Guibin Qiao MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all patients during the online questionnaire distribution period.

Consent for Publication

Informed consent was obtained from all patients during the online questionnaire distribution period.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, S., Tang, Y., Wu, H. et al. Early and Persistent Dysphagia Relief Predicts Tumor Response in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Immunochemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 5171–5181 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13467-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13467-7

Navigation