Skip to main content

Practice Pattern Variability in the Management of Regional Lymph Node Metastasis in Extremity and Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of the Society of Surgical Oncology and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Membership

Abstract

Background

Regional lymph node metastasis in extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma (ETSTS) is rare with no standardized management. We sought to determine management patterns for regional lymph node metastasis in ETSTS.

Methods

A survey regarding the management of ETSTS lymph node metastasis was distributed to the membership of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) in January 2022. The survey queried the type of training (surgical oncology, orthopedic oncology), details of their practice setting, and management decisions of hypothetical ETSTS scenarios that involved potential or confirmed lymph node metastasis.

Results

The survey was distributed to 349 MSTS members (open rate of 63%, completion rate 21%) and 3026 SSO members (open rate of 55%, completion rate 4.7%) and was completed by 214 respondents, of whom 73 (34.1%) and 141 (65.9%) were orthopedic oncology and surgical oncology fellowship-trained, respectively. The majority of respondents practiced in an academic setting (n = 171, 79.9%) and treat >10 extremity sarcoma cases annually (n = 138, 62.2%). In scenarios with confirmed nodal disease for clear cell and epithelioid sarcoma, surgical oncologists were inclined to perform lymphadenectomy, while orthopedic oncologists were inclined to offer targeted lymph node excision with adjuvant radiation (p < 0.001). There was heterogeneity of responses regarding the management of nodal disease regardless of training background.

Conclusion

Self-reported management of nodal disease in ETSTS was variable among respondent groups with differences and similarities based on training background. These data highlight the variability of practice for nodal disease management and the need for consensus-based guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Keung EZ, Chiang YJ, Voss RK, et al. Defining the incidence and clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(1):170–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coindre J-M, Terrier P, Bui NB, et al. Prognostic factors in adult patients with locally controlled soft tissue sarcoma. A study of 546 patients from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(3):869–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fong Y, Coit DG, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Lymph node metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Analysis of data from a prospective database of 1772 sarcoma patients. Ann Surg. 1993;217(1):72–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Trovik C, Bauer H, Alvegård T, et al. Surgical margins, local recurrence and metastasis in soft tissue sarcomas: 559 surgically-treated patients from the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Register. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36(6):710–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Riad S, Griffin AM, Liberman B, et al. Lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma in an extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:129–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sawamura C, Matsumoto S, Shimoji T, Ae K, Okawa A. Lymphadenectomy and histologic subtype affect overall survival of soft tissue sarcoma patients with nodal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):926–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johannesmeyer D, Smith V, Cole DJ, Esnaola NF, Camp ER. The impact of lymph node disease in extremity soft-tissue sarcomas: a population-based analysis. Am J Surg. 2013;206(3):289–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazeron JJ, Suit HD. Lymph nodes as sites of metastases from sarcomas of soft tissue. Cancer. 1987;60(8):1800–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Daigeler A, Kuhnen C, Moritz R, et al. Lymph node metastases in soft tissue sarcomas—a single center analysis of 1597 patients. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2009;394(2):321–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Emori M, Tsuchie H, Nagasawa H, et al. Early lymph node metastasis may predict poor prognosis in soft tissue sarcoma. Int J Surg Oncol. 2019;2019:6708474.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Skinner KA, Eilber FR. Soft tissue sarcoma nodal metastases: biologic significance and therapeutic considerations. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1996;5(1):121–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Behranwala KA, A’Hern R, Omar AM, Thomas JM. Prognosis of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(7):714–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heudel PE, Cousin P, Lurkin A, et al. Territorial inequalities in management and conformity to clinical guidelines for sarcoma patients: an exhaustive population-based cohort analysis in the Rhône-Alpes region. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;19(4):744–52.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sherman KL, Kinnier CV, Farina DA, et al. Examination of national lymph node evaluation practices for adult extremity soft tissue sarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(6):682–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sherman KL, Wayne JD, Chung J, et al. Assessment of multimodality therapy use for extremity sarcoma in the United States. J Surg Oncol. 2014;109(5):395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenthal J, Cardona K, Sayyid SK, et al. Nodal metastases of soft tissue sarcomas: risk factors, imaging findings, and implications. Skelet Radiol. 2020;49(2):221–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Witt RG, Baldini EH, Raut CP. Screening populations at high risk for soft tissue sarcoma and surveillance following soft tissue sarcoma resection. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(5):882–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maduekwe UN, Hornicek FJ, Springfield DS, et al. Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the staging of synovial, epithelioid, and clear cell sarcomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(5):1356–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011.

  20. Witt RG, Cope B, Erstad DJ, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and formal lymphadenectomy for soft tissue sarcoma: a single center experience of 86 consecutive cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(11):7092–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Refaie WB, Andtbacka RH, Ensor J, et al. Lymphadenectomy for isolated lymph node metastasis from extremity soft-tissue sarcomas. Cancer. 2008;112(8):1821–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher SB, Chiang Y-J, Feig BW, et al. Comparative performance of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems for soft tissue Sarcoma of the trunk and extremities. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(5):1126–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Basile G, Mattei JC, Alshaygy I, et al. Curability of patients with lymph node metastases from extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 2020;126(23):5098–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Witt RG, Roland CL, Keung EZ. ASO author reflections: lymph node disease in soft tissue sarcoma: a problematic clinical dilemma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(11):7101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Andreou D, Boldt H, Werner M, Hamann C, Pink D, Tunn PU. Sentinel node biopsy in soft tissue sarcoma subtypes with a high propensity for regional lymphatic spread–results of a large prospective trial. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(5):1400–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brady AC, Picado O, Tashiro J, Sola JE, Perez EA. Lymph node sampling and survival in child and adolescent extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. J Surg Res. 2019;241:205–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wright S, Armeson K, Hill EG, et al. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in select sarcoma patients: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2012;204(4):428–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Parida L, Morrisson GT, Shammas A, et al. Role of lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of pediatric melanoma and sarcoma. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28(6):571–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. von Mehren M, Kane JM, Bui MM, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: soft tissue sarcoma, version 1.2021: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2020;18(12):1604–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Amer KM, Thomson JE, Congiusta D, et al. Epidemiology, incidence, and survival of rhabdomyosarcoma subtypes: SEER and ICES database analysis. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(10):2226–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Egas-Bejar D, Huh WW. Rhabdomyosarcoma in adolescent and young adult patients: current perspectives. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2014;5:115.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Keung EZ, Chiang Y-J, Cormier JN, et al. Treatment at low-volume hospitals is associated with reduced short-term and long-term outcomes for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Cancer. 2018;124(23):4495–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Blay J-Y, Honore C, Stoeckle E, et al. Surgery in reference centers improves survival of sarcoma patients: a nationwide study. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(7):1143–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lazarides AL, Kerr DL, Nussbaum DP, et al. Soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: what is the value of treating at high-volume centers? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(4):718–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shannon AB, Straker RJ, Song Y, Kelz RR, Miura JT, Karakousis GC. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and trends in extremity sarcoma management by surgeon specialty. Surgery. 2021;170(4):1168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Kelly Hunt is a member of the Medical Advisory Board for Armada Health and AstraZeneca, and has received research funding, paid to her institution, from Cairn Surgical, Eli Lilly & Co., and Lumicell. Russell Witt is supported by the National Institutes of Health (T32 CA 009599) and an MD Anderson Cancer Center support grant (P30 CA016672).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Z. Keung MD, AM, FACS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Rachel K. Voss, Yi-Ju Chiang, Sa Nguyen, Christopher P. Scally, Patrick P. Lin, Keila E. Torres, Bryan S. Moon, Robert L. Satcher, Justin E. Bird, Barry W. Feig, Valerae O. Lewis, Christina L. Roland, and Emily Z. Keung have no disclosures to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 1056 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Witt, R.G., Voss, R.K., Chiang, YJ. et al. Practice Pattern Variability in the Management of Regional Lymph Node Metastasis in Extremity and Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of the Society of Surgical Oncology and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Membership. Ann Surg Oncol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13142-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13142-x