Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Pretreatment Esophageal Stenosis on Survival of Esophageal Cancer Patients

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the survival impacts of pretreatment cancerous stenosis on patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC).

Methods

The clinicopathologic characteristics of patients who underwent surgery for EC between January 2010 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Esophageal stenosis was defined as present when a thin endoscope could not be passed through the tumor site. The impacts of stenosis on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated using Cox hazards analysis.

Results

Of the 496 EC patients in this study, 51 (10.3 %) had pretreatment esophageal stenosis. Stenosis was associated with lower body mass index (P < 0.001) and higher pStage (P < 0.001). The 3-year OS rate for the patients with stenosis was significantly poorer than for the patients without stenosis (40.2 % vs 69.6 %; hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; P < 0.001). The survival outcomes, especially CSS, for the patients with stenosis were significantly poorer than for the patients without stenosis for both pStage II-III (P = 0.009) and pStage IV (P = 0.006) disease. The OS and CSS curves were well stratified by the presence of stenosis even in early-stage (pStage II) patients (P = 0.04 and P < 0.01, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed esophageal stenosis, pStage III-IV disease, and non-curative resection to be independently associated with poor OS (HR, 1.61; P = 0.02) and poor CSS (HR,1.67; P = 0.02). Higher pStage was an independent predictor of poor CSS for patients without stenosis, but not for those with stenosis.

Conclusions

Esophageal carcinoma patients with pretreatment stenosis had significantly poorer survival outcomes, especially poorer CSS, than those without stenosis in both early- and advanced-stage diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uhlenhopp DJ, Then EO, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer: update in global trends, etiology, and risk factors. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2020;13:1010–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smyth EC, Lagergren J, Fitzgerald RC, et al. Oesophageal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagi T, Makino T, Yamasaki M, et al. Dysphagia score as a predictor of adverse events due to triplet chemotherapy and oncological outcomes in 434 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:4754–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deng HY, Alai G, Luo J, Li G, Zhuo ZG, Lin YD. Cancerous esophageal stenosis before treatment was significantly correlated to poor prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:4212–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Steenhagen E. Preoperative nutritional optimization of esophageal cancer patients. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 5):S645–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmed O, Lee JH, Thompson CC, Faulx A. AGA clinical practice update on the optimal management of the malignant alimentary tract obstruction: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19:1780–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clavier JB, Antoni D, Atlani D, et al. Baseline nutritional status is prognostic factor after definitive radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2014;27:560–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Okuno T, Wakabayashi M, Kato K, et al. Esophageal stenosis and the Glasgow Prognostic Score as independent factors of poor prognosis for patients with locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy (exploratory analysis of JCOG0303). Int J Clin Oncol. 2017;22:1042–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang YS, Hu WP, Ni PZ, Wang WP, Yuan Y, Chen LQ. Esophageal luminal stenosis is an independent prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:43397–405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. du Rieu MC, Filleron T, Beluchon B, et al. Recurrence risk after Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy for cancer. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:215.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brierley J, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. The TNM Classification of Malignant tumours. 8th ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.

  13. Sugawara K, Aikou S, Yajima S, et al. Pre-and post-operative low prognostic nutritional index influences survival in older patients with gastric carcinoma. J Geriat Oncol. 2020;11(6):989–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugawara K, Mori K, Yagi K, Aikou S, Uemura Y, Yamashita H, Seto Y. Association of preoperative inflammation-based prognostic score with survival in patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2019;32(4):doy066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, et al. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 1. Esophagus. 2019;16:1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hara H, Tahara M, Daiko H, et al. Phase II feasibility study of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:1455–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mariette C, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, et al. Self-expanding covered metallic stent as a bridge to surgery in esophageal cancer: impact on oncologic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:287–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:11–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kita R, Miyata H, Sugimura K, et al. Clinical effect of enteral nutrition support during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the preservation of skeletal muscle mass in patients with esophageal cancer. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:4380–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodrigues-Pinto E, Ferreira-Silva J, Sousa-Pinto B, et al. Self-expandable metal stents in esophageal cancer before preoperative neoadjuvant therapy: efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:5130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Shinoda M, Ando N, Kato K, et al. Randomized study of low-dose versus standard-dose chemoradiotherapy for unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JCOG0303). Cancer Sci. 2015;106:407–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sugawara K, Yamashita H, Okumura Y, Yagi K, Yoshimura S, Kawasaki K, Seto Y. Relationships among body composition, muscle strength, and sarcopenia in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(6):2797–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sugawara K, Yamashita H, Okumura Y, Yagi K, Aikou S, Seto Y. Age-dependent survival impact of body mass index in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(10 Pt A):1948–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Imamura H, Nishikawa K, Kishi K, et al. Effects of an oral elemental nutritional supplement on post-gastrectomy body weight loss in gastric cancer patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2928–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Movahed S, Varshoee Tabrizi F, Pahlavani N, et al. Comprehensive assessment of nutritional status and nutritional-related complications in newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:4449–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Previtali P, Fiore M, Colombo J, et al. Malnutrition and perioperative nutritional support in retroperitoneal sarcoma patients: results from a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:2025–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mariette C, Balon JM, Maunoury V, Taillier G, Van Seuningen I, Triboulet JP. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography as a predictor of long-term survival in oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Morgan MA, Twine CP, Lewis WG, et al. Prognostic significance of failure to cross esophageal tumors by endoluminal ultrasound. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:508–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Okadome K, Baba Y, Yagi T, et al. Prognostic nutritional index, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2020;271:693–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Xie SH, Santoni G, Mälberg K, Lagergren P, Lagergren J. Prediction model of long-term survival after esophageal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2021;273:933–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sugawara K, Yagi K, Uemura Y, et al. Associations of systemic inflammation and sarcopenia with survival of esophageal carcinoma patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:374–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sugawara K, Yagi K, Okumura Y, Aikou S, Yamashita H, Seto Y. Survival prediction capabilities of preoperative inflammatory and nutritional status in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. World J Surg. 2022;46:639–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sugawara K, Yagi K, Okumura Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of multimodal therapy combining definitive chemoradiotherapy and salvage surgery for T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020;25:552–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yokota T, Kato K, Hamamoto Y, et al. Phase II study of chemoselection with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy and subsequent conversion surgery for locally advanced unresectable oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016;115:1328–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Terada M, Hara H, Daiko H, et al. Phase III study of tri-modality combination therapy with induction docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG1510: TRIANgLE). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49:1055–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kato K, Ito Y, Daiko H, et al. A randomized controlled phase III trial comparing two chemotherapy regimen and chemoradiotherapy regimen as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, JCOG1109 NExT study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(4 Suppl):238–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1948–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kato K, Cho BC, Takahashi M, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1506–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Elliott JA, Doyle SL, Murphy CF, et al. Sarcopenia: prevalence, and impact on operative and oncologic outcomes in the multimodal management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2017;266:822–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Deftereos I, Kiss N, Isenring E, Carter VM, Yeung JM. A systematic review of the effect of preoperative nutrition support on nutritional status and treatment outcomes in upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:1423–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tanaka Y, Takeuchi H, Nakashima Y, et al. Effects of an elemental diet to reduce adverse events in patients with esophageal cancer receiving docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil: a phase III randomized controlled trial-EPOC 2 (JFMC49-1601-C5). ESMO Open. 2021;6:100277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, Strom BL. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:280–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hwang ES, Wang X. Value of propensity score-matching to study surgical outcomes. Ann Surg. 2017;265:457–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kotaro Sugawara MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

There are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 76 kb)

10434_2022_12945_MOESM3_ESM.tiff

Fig. S1 Survival outcomes according to the presence of stenosis and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS). (a) Overall survival (OS) and (b) cancer-specific survival (CSS) curves according to the presence of stenosis and GPS. Patients with both pretreatment stenosis and high GPS had much poorer survival outcomes (median survival time (MST), 5.9 months) than those who had only one or neither of these factors (P < 0.01).

Supplementary file3 (TIFF 8660 kb)

Supplementary file4 (DOCX 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sugawara, K., Fukuda, T., Kishimoto, Y. et al. The Impact of Pretreatment Esophageal Stenosis on Survival of Esophageal Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 2703–2712 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12945-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12945-8

Navigation