Abstract
Background
Although imaging surveillance after esophagectomy is required to achieve long-term survival for patients with esophageal cancer, the optimal surveillance timing and interval remain unclear. This study was designed to investigate the differences in oncological outcomes based on the detection method for recurrence and surveillance interval in patients with recurrence detected by routine imaging examination after esophagectomy.
Methods
A total of 527 patients who underwent thoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with R0 resection between 2003 and 2021 in our department were enrolled in this study. Postoperative, routine surveillance was conducted at an outpatient clinic every 3 months, thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) every 4–6 months, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy every 6 months. The detection method and optimal interval of imaging surveillance also were investigated.
Results
Of all patients, 161 patients developed recurrence during surveillance; 110 (68.3 %) by routine surveillance and 37 (23.0%) not detected by routine surveillance. Among patients who were diagnosed with recurrence following routine surveillance, patients with pStage IV disease on imaging surveillance by thoracoabdominal CT at an interval of ≤ 5 months had a better survival rate than those with an interval of 6 months (P = 0.004), whereas no significant difference among different intervals was observed in patients with pStage I–III disease.
Conclusions
Recurrence may have been detectable by our routine surveillance in approximately 70% of patients who developed recurrence. These findings demonstrate the necessity of different imaging surveillance intervals for different pStages of esophageal cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30.
Takeuchi M, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Perioperative risk calculator predicts long-term oncologic outcome for patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:837–43.
Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, Mayanagi S, et al. Influence of neoadjuvant therapy on poor long-term outcomes of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:2081–9.
Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.
Ichida H, Imamura H, Yoshimoto J, et al. Pattern of postoperative recurrence and hepatic and/or pulmonary resection for liver and/or lung metastases from esophageal carcinoma. World J Surg. 2013;37:398–407.
Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, et al. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors after recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg. 2018;42:2190–8.
Hoshino S, Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, et al. Usefulness of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio at recurrence for predicting long-term outcomes in patients with recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:3001–8.
Lou F, Sima CS, Adusumilli PS, et al. Esophageal cancer recurrence patterns and implications for surveillance. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:1558–62.
Mariette C, Balon JM, Piessen G, et al. Pattern of recurrence following complete resection of esophageal carcinoma and factors predictive of recurrent disease. Cancer. 2003;97:1616–23.
Lightdale CJ, Kulkarni KG. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging and follow-up of esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4483–9.
Roedl JB, Harisinghani MG, Colen RR, et al. Assessment of treatment response and recurrence in esophageal carcinoma based on tumor length and standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1131–8.
Elliott JA, Markar SR, Klevebro F, et al. An international multicenter study exploring whether surveillance after esophageal cancer surgery impacts oncological and quality of life outcomes (ENSURE). Ann Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005378.
Nakagawa S, Kanda T, Kosugi SI, et al. Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:205–11.
Moyes LH, Anderson JE, Forshaw MJ. Proposed follow up programme after curative resection for lower third oesophageal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2010;8:75.
Rice TW, Patil DT, Blackstone EH. 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6:119–30.
Kaburagi T, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38:410–8.
Morimoto Y, Kawakubo H, Ishikawa A, et al. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective study. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021;15:1–9.
Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.
Morita M, Saeki H, Ito S, et al. Surgical strategies for esophageal cancer associated with head and neck cancer. Surg Today. 2014;44:1603–10.
Kurogochi T, Honda M, Takahashi K, et al. Clinical features and risk factors for early recurrence after esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2022;52:660–7.
Yoshida N, Baba Y, Shigaki H, et al. Risk factors of early recurrence within 6 months after esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21:1071–8.
Doki Y, Ajani JA, Kato K, et al. Nivolumab combination therapy in advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:449–62.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Kumiko Motooka, a staff member at the Department of Surgery in Keio University School of Medicine, for her help with the preparation of this manuscript.
Funding
Dr. Kitagawa reports grants from TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd.; DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY; Merck Serono Co., Ltd; AsahiKASEI Co., Ltd; EA Pharma Co., Ltd.; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory Inc.; SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.; KAKEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Astellas Pharma Inc.; MEDICON INC., DAINIPPON SUMITOMO PHARMA Co., Ltd.; Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Kyouwa Hakkou Kirin Co., Ltd.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; NIHON PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; Japan Blood Products Organization; Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd.; Sanofi K.K.; Eisai Co., Ltd; TSUMURA & CO.; KCI Licensing, Inc.; ABBOTT JAPAN CO., LTD; and FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Takeuchi, M., Kawakubo, H., Matsuda, S. et al. The Usability of Intensive Imaging Surveillance After Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 2190–2197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12739-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12739-y