Skip to main content
Log in

The Usability of Intensive Imaging Surveillance After Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although imaging surveillance after esophagectomy is required to achieve long-term survival for patients with esophageal cancer, the optimal surveillance timing and interval remain unclear. This study was designed to investigate the differences in oncological outcomes based on the detection method for recurrence and surveillance interval in patients with recurrence detected by routine imaging examination after esophagectomy.

Methods

A total of 527 patients who underwent thoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with R0 resection between 2003 and 2021 in our department were enrolled in this study. Postoperative, routine surveillance was conducted at an outpatient clinic every 3 months, thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) every 4–6 months, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy every 6 months. The detection method and optimal interval of imaging surveillance also were investigated.

Results

Of all patients, 161 patients developed recurrence during surveillance; 110 (68.3 %) by routine surveillance and 37 (23.0%) not detected by routine surveillance. Among patients who were diagnosed with recurrence following routine surveillance, patients with pStage IV disease on imaging surveillance by thoracoabdominal CT at an interval of ≤ 5 months had a better survival rate than those with an interval of 6 months (P = 0.004), whereas no significant difference among different intervals was observed in patients with pStage I–III disease.

Conclusions

Recurrence may have been detectable by our routine surveillance in approximately 70% of patients who developed recurrence. These findings demonstrate the necessity of different imaging surveillance intervals for different pStages of esophageal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takeuchi M, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Perioperative risk calculator predicts long-term oncologic outcome for patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:837–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, Mayanagi S, et al. Influence of neoadjuvant therapy on poor long-term outcomes of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:2081–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ichida H, Imamura H, Yoshimoto J, et al. Pattern of postoperative recurrence and hepatic and/or pulmonary resection for liver and/or lung metastases from esophageal carcinoma. World J Surg. 2013;37:398–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, et al. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors after recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg. 2018;42:2190–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoshino S, Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, et al. Usefulness of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio at recurrence for predicting long-term outcomes in patients with recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:3001–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lou F, Sima CS, Adusumilli PS, et al. Esophageal cancer recurrence patterns and implications for surveillance. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:1558–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mariette C, Balon JM, Piessen G, et al. Pattern of recurrence following complete resection of esophageal carcinoma and factors predictive of recurrent disease. Cancer. 2003;97:1616–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lightdale CJ, Kulkarni KG. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging and follow-up of esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4483–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roedl JB, Harisinghani MG, Colen RR, et al. Assessment of treatment response and recurrence in esophageal carcinoma based on tumor length and standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1131–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elliott JA, Markar SR, Klevebro F, et al. An international multicenter study exploring whether surveillance after esophageal cancer surgery impacts oncological and quality of life outcomes (ENSURE). Ann Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakagawa S, Kanda T, Kosugi SI, et al. Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moyes LH, Anderson JE, Forshaw MJ. Proposed follow up programme after curative resection for lower third oesophageal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2010;8:75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rice TW, Patil DT, Blackstone EH. 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6:119–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaburagi T, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, et al. Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38:410–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morimoto Y, Kawakubo H, Ishikawa A, et al. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective study. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021;15:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morita M, Saeki H, Ito S, et al. Surgical strategies for esophageal cancer associated with head and neck cancer. Surg Today. 2014;44:1603–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurogochi T, Honda M, Takahashi K, et al. Clinical features and risk factors for early recurrence after esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2022;52:660–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshida N, Baba Y, Shigaki H, et al. Risk factors of early recurrence within 6 months after esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21:1071–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Doki Y, Ajani JA, Kato K, et al. Nivolumab combination therapy in advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:449–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Kumiko Motooka, a staff member at the Department of Surgery in Keio University School of Medicine, for her help with the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

Dr. Kitagawa reports grants from TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd.; DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY; Merck Serono Co., Ltd; AsahiKASEI Co., Ltd; EA Pharma Co., Ltd.; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory Inc.; SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.; KAKEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Astellas Pharma Inc.; MEDICON INC., DAINIPPON SUMITOMO PHARMA Co., Ltd.; Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Kyouwa Hakkou Kirin Co., Ltd.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; NIHON PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; Japan Blood Products Organization; Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd.; Sanofi K.K.; Eisai Co., Ltd; TSUMURA & CO.; KCI Licensing, Inc.; ABBOTT JAPAN CO., LTD; and FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirofumi Kawakubo MD, PhD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takeuchi, M., Kawakubo, H., Matsuda, S. et al. The Usability of Intensive Imaging Surveillance After Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 2190–2197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12739-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12739-y

Navigation