Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ASO Author Reflections: Comprehensive Comparison of N Staging Subclassification Methods for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

  • ASO Author Reflections
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Asamura H, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The international association for the study of lung cancer lung cancer staging project. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(12):1675–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rusch VW, Crowley J, Giroux DJ, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revision of the N descriptors in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(7):603–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yun JK, Lee GD, Choi S, et al. Comparison between lymph node station- and zone-based classification for the future revision of node descriptors proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer in surgically resected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56(5):849–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li S, Yan S, Lu F, et al. Validation of the 8th edition nodal staging and proposal of new nodal categories for future editions of the TNM classification of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:4517–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu L, Su H, She Y, et al. Which N descriptor is more predictive of prognosis in resected non-small cell lung cancer: the number of involved nodal stations or the location-based pathological N stage? Chest. 2021;159(6):2458–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Yang Z, Li S, et al. A comprehensive comparison of different nodal subclassification methods in surgical resected non-small cell lung cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12363-w.

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhenyu Yang and Zihuai Wang contributed equally to this article.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Zhenyu Yang MD, Zihuai Wang MD & Lunxu Liu MD, PhD, FRCS

Authors
  1. Zhenyu Yang MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zihuai Wang MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lunxu Liu MD, PhD, FRCS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lunxu Liu MD, PhD, FRCS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Wang, Z. & Liu, L. ASO Author Reflections: Comprehensive Comparison of N Staging Subclassification Methods for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 8154–8155 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12398-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12398-z

Search

Navigation