Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Disparities in Presentations at the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) Meetings From 2014 to 2019

  • Global Health Services Research
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Participation in surgical society meetings serves as a proxy for academic success and is important for career development. This study aimed to investigate and report the gender breakdown of presenters at recent Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) meetings.

Methods

Genders of presenters for poster, parallel, plenary, and video sessions at SSO meetings from 2014 through 2019 were collected. These data were broken down to first–last authorship relationships including female–female, female–male, male–female, and male–male. The proportions of female-to-male presenters were compared for each session type. Statistical significance was set at p value lower than 0.05.

Results

From 2014 through 2019, the SSO had 2920 presenters, and 47% were female. Women were listed as first authors more often for the poster session (48%) than for other sessions (parallel, plenary, and video) (p = 0.003). Women also were listed more often as senior authors for the poster session (31%) than for other sessions (p = 0.004). Female senior authors were fewer than male senior authors across all session types. Female first authors had the highest representation in breast (75%), endocrine (48%), and cutaneous (46%) specialties (p < 0.001). The most common combination of first and senior authors was male–male (43%), followed by female–male (28%), female–female (19%), and male–female (10%).

Conclusion

Overall, female presentation at SSO is comparable with society demographics, and female first authorship is relatively equal to male first authorship in poster sessions. Whereas female first authorship improved over time, female senior authorship remained relatively flat. Opportunities to improve gender equality in senior authorship positions should be explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ruzycki SM, Fletcher S, Earp M, Bharwani A, Lithgow KC. Trends in the proportion of female speakers at medical conferences in the United States and in Canada, 2007 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e192103. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lautenberger DM, Dandar VM. The state of women in academic medicine: 2018–2019 AAMC. 2020. Retrieved 22 December 2021 at https://store.aamc.org/the-state-of-women-in-academic-medicine-2018-2019-exploring-pathways-to-equity.html.

  3. Moheet AM, Mainali S, McCredie VA, et al. A longitudinal study of gender parity trends of general membership and leadership in the Neurocritical Care Society between 2002 and 2019. Neurocrit Care. 2020;35(1):16–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01124-w (PMID: 33108626).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blumenthal DM, Olenski AR, Yeh RW, et al. Sex differences in faculty rank among academic cardiologists in the United States. Circulation. 2017;135:506–17. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023520.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dijksterhuis WPM, Stroes CI, Tan WL, Ithimakin S, Calles A, van Oijen MGH, et al. From presentation to paper: gender disparities in oncological research. Int J Cancer. 2020;146:3011–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32660 (PMID: 31472016; PMCID: PMC7187424).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shannon G, Jansen M, Williams K, Cáceres C, Motta A, Odhiambo A, et al. Gender equality in science, medicine, and global health: where are we at and why does it matter? Lancet. 2019;393:560–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33135-0 (PMID: 30739691).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Filardo G, da Graca B, Sass DM, Pollock BD, Smith EB, Martinez MA. Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high-impact medical journals: observational study (1994–2014). BMJ. 2016;352:i847. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i847.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Padmanaban V, DaCosta A, Tran A, Kunac A, Swaroop M, Zhang WW, Sifri ZC. Closing the gender gap in global surgery: trends at the Academic Surgical Congress. J Surg Res. 2021;257:389–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.027 (PMID: 32892135).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roster F. U.S. Medical School Faculty. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zaza N, Ofshteyn A, Martinez-Quinones P, Sakran J, Stein SL. Gender equity at surgical conferences: quantity and quality. J Surg Res. 2021;258:100–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.036 (PMID: 33002662).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehta S, Rose L, Cook D, Herridge M, Owais S, Metaxa V. The Speaker Gender Gap at Critical Care Conferences. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health Inc; 2018. p. 991-e996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu Y, Edwards BL, Brooks KD, Newhook TE, Slingluff CL. Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding for surgery: 2003 to 2013. Am J Surg. 2015;209:1083–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Larivière V, Ni C, Gingras Y, et al. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science. Nature. 2013;504:211–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lundine J, Bourgeault IL, Clark J, et al. The gendered system of academic publishing. Lancet. 2018;391:1754–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van LT, Wouters P. Analysis of Gender Distribution in Dutch Oncology Research. Centre for Sciense and Technology Studies, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2018. Available from: https://athenasangels.nl/images/Analysis_of_Gender_in_Dutch_Oncology_research.pdf.

  16. González-Alvarez J, Cervera-Crespo T. Research production in high-impact journals of contemporary neuroscience: a gender analysis. J Informet. 2017;11:232–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun GH, Moloci NM, Schmidt K, et al. Representation of women as authors of collaborative cancer clinical trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:806–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wrenn SM, Gartland RM, Kuo LE, Cho NL. The glass podium: gender representation within the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) from to 2019. Surgery. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.039 (PMID: 34598776).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rotenstein LS, Jena AB. Lost Taussigs: the consequences of gender discrimination in medicine. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2255–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1802228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reeder-Hayes K, Felip E, Patt D, et al. Women in oncology: progress, challenges, and keys to success. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ B. 2013;33:448–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinberg JJ, Skae C, Sampson B. Gender gap, disparity, and inequality in peer review. Lancet. 2018;391:2602–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31141-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mainali S, Moheet AM, McCredie VA, Livesay S, Manners J, Rhoney DH, Muehlschlegel S. The neurocritical care society gender parity analysis in grants and recognition awards. Neurocrit Care. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01164-2 (PMID: 33442813).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Preventza O, Backhus L. US women in thoracic surgery: reflections on the past and opportunities for the future. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13:473–9. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.04.13 (PMID:33569234; PMCID:PMC7867830).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Silva NA, Cerasiello SY, Herendeen JS, Sotayo A, Say I, Mazzola CA, et al. Gender differences in NIH grant funding in neurological surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;80:43–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.052 (PMID: 33099365).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Riccardi J, Farber NI, Ho V, Bonne SL. Uncovering disparities in scholarly productivity among junior surgical society grant recipients. J Surg Res. 2021;257:128–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.057 (PMID: 32823010; PMCID: PMC7759149).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schroeder J, Dugdale HL, Radersma R, et al. Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia. J Evol Biol. 2013;26:2063–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gerull KM, Holten A, Rhea L, Cipriano C. Is the distribution of awards gender-balanced in orthopaedic surgery societies? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001364 (PMID:32555007; PMCID:PMC7899733).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lyu HG, Davids JS, Scully RE, Melnitchouk N. Association of domestic responsibilities with career satisfaction for physician mothers in procedural vs nonprocedural fields. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:689–95. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0529 (PMID:30969336; PMCID:PMC6583845).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Preventza O, Backhus L. US women in thoracic surgery: reflections on the past and opportunities for the future. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13:473–9. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.04.13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Merrill A, Beal EW, Ackah R, Patterson K, Horning P, Ejaz A, et al. Women in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery: is there a pipeline problem? HPB Oxford. 2021;23:817–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.017 (PMID: 33341339).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Behmer Hansen RT, Silva NA, Cuevas R, Cerasiello SY, Richardson AM, Mammis A, Nanda A. Fellowship, gender, and scholarly productivity: trends among academic neurosurgeons in the US. J Neurosurg. 2020;28:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.5.JNS20577 (PMID: 32858514).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mesquita-Neto JW, Manoharan J, Dailey W, Macedo FI, Merchant NB. National institutes of health research funding to academic surgical oncologists: Who are we and where do we stand? Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(8):4195–2. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09495-2 (PMID: 33432489).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hofstädter-Thalmann E, Dafni U, Allen T, et al. Report on the status of women occupying leadership roles in oncology. ESMO Open. 2018;3:e000423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Woldegerima N, Thomopulos A, Bafford A, Malik RD. Gender differences in urology society award recipients. Am J Surg. 2020;220:1152–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.062 (PMID: 32773170).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Heather G. Lyu MD, MBI

  2. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Pamela Lu MD, MPH, David A. Mahvi MD, Chandrajit P. Raut MD, MSc & Nancy L. Cho MD

  3. Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Lindsay E. Y. Kuo MD, MBA

  4. Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA

    Sandra L. Wong MD, MS

  5. Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Chandrajit P. Raut MD, MSc

Authors
  1. Heather G. Lyu MD, MBI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pamela Lu MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David A. Mahvi MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lindsay E. Y. Kuo MD, MBA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sandra L. Wong MD, MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chandrajit P. Raut MD, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nancy L. Cho MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather G. Lyu MD, MBI.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Chandrajit Raut–UpToDate/Wolters Kluwer–author for 5 sarcoma sections.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lyu, H.G., Lu, P., Mahvi, D.A. et al. Gender Disparities in Presentations at the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) Meetings From 2014 to 2019. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 8107–8114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12109-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12109-8

Search

Navigation