Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Histopathological Growth Pattern of Colorectal Liver Metastases Impacts Local Recurrence Risk and the Adequate Width of the Surgical Margin

  • Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The histopathological growth pattern (HGP) of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has been associated with prognosis. This study was designed to elucidate if the HGP is associated with local recurrence risk and impacts the adequate width of surgical margin.

Methods

All consecutive patients resected for CLM in 2018–2019 were considered. HGP was prospectively classified as follows: desmoplastic, pushing, and replacement. Surgical margin was classified as follows: R0 (margin ≥ 1 mm), R1vasc (0-mm margin, tumor detachment from intrahepatic vessels), and R1par (tumor exposure along transection plane). R0 resections were further distinguished in R0min (1-mm margin) and R0wide (> 1-mm margin).

Results

A total of 340 resection areas in 136 patients were analyzed (70 R0min, 143 R0wide, 31 R1vasc, 96 R1par). HGP was desmoplastic in 26 cases, pushing in 221, and replacement in 93. Thirty-six local recurrences occurred (11%, median follow-up 21 months): 1 after R0wide, 4 after R0min, 3 after R1vasc, and 28 after R1par resection. In R1par group, local recurrence rate was high independently of HGP (29%). In R1vasc and R0min groups, local recurrence risk was higher in the replacement group (R1vasc: 29% vs. 4% if pushing/desmoplastic; R0min: 11% vs. 4%). In R0wide group, local recurrence risk was low for all HGP ( < 1%). Independent predictors of local recurrence were replacement HGP (odds ratio = 1.654, P = 0.036), and R1par resection (odds ratio = 57.209, P < 0.001 vs. R0).

Conclusions

Replacement HGP is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence. In these patients, a wide surgical margin should be pursued, because R1vasc and R0min resections could be insufficient. R1par resection is inadequate, independently of the HGP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):313]. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 68(6): 394-424. doi:https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

  2. Engstrand J, Nilsson H, Strömberg C, Jonas E, Freedman J. Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3925-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Horn SR, Stoltzfus KC, Lehrer EJ, et al. Epidemiology of liver metastases. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;67:101760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2020.101760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Viganò L, Pedicini V, Comito T, et al. Aggressive and multidisciplinary local approach to iterative recurrences of colorectal liver metastases. World J Surg. 2018;42(8):2651–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4525-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Jong MC, Pulitano C, Ribero D, et al. Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: an international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):440–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b4539b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Viganò L, Torzilli G, Cimino M, et al. Drop-out between the two liver resections of two-stage hepatectomy. Patient selection or loss of chance? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(9):1385–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pawlik TM, Scoggins CR, Zorzi D, et al. Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg. 2005;241(5):715–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000160703.75808.7d.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ardito F, Panettieri E, Vellone M, et al. The impact of R1 resection for colorectal liver metastases on local recurrence and overall survival in the era of modern chemotherapy: An analysis of 1,428 resection areas. Surgery. 2019;165(4):712–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Viganò L, Procopio F, Cimino MM, et al. Is tumor detachment from vascular structures equivalent to R0 resection in surgery for colorectal liver metastases? An Observational Cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1352–60. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5009-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Torzilli G, Donadon M, Palmisano A, et al. Ultrasound guided liver resection: does this approach limit the need for portal vein embolization? Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56(94–95):1483–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Torzilli G, Procopio F, Viganò L, et al. Hepatic vein management in a parenchyma-sparing policy for resecting colorectal liver metastases at the caval confluence. Surgery. 2018;163(2):277–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Torzilli G, Viganò L, Gatti A, et al. Twelve-year experience of “radical but conservative” liver surgery for colorectal metastases: impact on surgical practice and oncologic efficacy. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(9):775–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.05.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Torzilli G, Serenari M, Viganò L, et al. Outcomes of enhanced one-stage ultrasound-guided hepatectomy for bilobar colorectal liver metastases compared to those of ALPPS: a multicenter case-match analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(10):1411–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Torzilli G, Viganò L, Cimino M, et al. Is enhanced one-stage hepatectomy a safe and feasible alternative to the two-stage hepatectomy in the setting of multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases? A comparative analysis between two pioneering centers. Dig Surg. 2018;35(4):323–32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vermeulen PB, Colpaert C, Salgado R, et al. Liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinomas grow in three patterns with different angiogenesis and desmoplasia. J Pathol. 2001;195(3):336–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.966.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Dam PJ, van der Stok EP, Teuwen LA, et al. International consensus guidelines for scoring the histopathological growth patterns of liver metastasis. Br J Cancer. 2017;117(10):1427–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.334.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernández Moro C, Bozóky B, Gerling M. Growth patterns of colorectal cancer liver metastases and their impact on prognosis: a systematic review. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2018;5(1):e000217. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Torzilli G, Montorsi M, Donadon M, et al. “Radical but conservative” is the main goal for ultrasonography-guided liver resection: prospective validation of this approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(4):517–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Torzilli G, Montorsi M, Del Fabbro D, Palmisano A, Donadon M, Makuuchi M. Ultrasonographically guided surgical approach to liver tumours involving the hepatic veins close to the caval confluence. Br J Surg. 2006;93(10):1238–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vigano L, Darwish SS, Rimassa L, et al. Progression of colorectal liver metastases from the end of chemotherapy to resection: a new contraindication to surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(6):1676–85. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6387-8 (Epub 2018 Feb 27 PMID: 29488188).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Torzilli G, Procopio F, Botea F, et al. One-stage ultrasonographically guided hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases: a feasible and effective alternative to the 2-stage approach. Surgery. 2009;146(1):60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.02.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Torzilli G. Ultrasound-guided liver surgery: an Atlas. Milan: Springer-Verlag; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Viganò L, Torzilli G, Troisi R, et al. Minor hepatectomies: focusing a blurred picture: analysis of the outcome of 4471 open resections in patients without cirrhosis. Ann Surg. 2019;270(5):842–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Viganò L, Torzilli G, Aldrighetti L, et al. Stratification of major hepatectomies according to their outcome: analysis of 2212 consecutive open resections in patients without cirrhosis. Ann Surg. 2020;272(5):827–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jass JR, Atkin WS, Cuzick J, et al. The grading of rectal cancer: historical perspectives and a multivariate analysis of 447 cases. Histopathology. 2002;41(3A):59–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eefsen RL, Van den Eynden GG, Høyer-Hansen G, et al. Histopathological growth pattern, proteolysis and angiogenesis in chemo-naive patients resected for multiple colorectal liver metastases. J Oncol. 2012;2012:907971. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/907971.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Eefsen RL, Vermeulen PB, Christensen IJ, et al. Growth pattern of colorectal liver metastasis as a marker of recurrence risk. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015;32(4):369–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-015-9715-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Serrablo A, Paliogiannis P, Pulighe F, et al. Impact of novel histopathological factors on the outcomes of liver surgery for colorectal cancer metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(9):1268–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nyström H, Naredi P, Berglund A, Palmqvist R, Tavelin B, Sund M. Liver-metastatic potential of colorectal cancer is related to the stromal composition of the tumor. Anticancer Res. 2012;32(12):5183–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pinheiro RS, Herman P, Lupinacci RM, et al. Tumor growth pattern as predictor of colorectal liver metastasis recurrence. Am J Surg. 2014;207(4):493–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van den Eynden GG, Bird NC, Majeed AW, Van Laere S, Dirix LY, Vermeulen PB. The histological growth pattern of colorectal cancer liver metastases has prognostic value. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2012;29(6):541–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-012-9469-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Falcão D, Alexandrino H, Caetano Oliveira R, et al. Histopathologic patterns as markers of prognosis in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases - Pushing growth as an independent risk factor for decreased survival. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(8):1212–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nagashima I, Oka T, Hamada C, Naruse K, Osada T, Muto T. Histopathological prognostic factors influencing long-term prognosis after surgical resection for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(3):739–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00945.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nielsen K, Rolff HC, Eefsen RL, Vainer B. The morphological growth patterns of colorectal liver metastases are prognostic for overall survival. Mod Pathol. 2014;27(12):1641–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2014.4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Frentzas S, Simoneau E, Bridgeman VL, et al. Vessel co-option mediates resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in liver metastases. Nat Med. 2016;22(11):1294–302. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Liang JY, Xi SY, Shao Q, et al. Histopathological growth patterns correlate with the immunoscore in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients after hepatectomy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020;69(12):2623–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-020-02632-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stremitzer S, Vermeulen P, Graver S, et al. Immune phenotype and histopathological growth pattern in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer. 2020;122(10):1518–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0812-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Baldin P, Van den Eynde M, Mlecnik B, et al. Prognostic assessment of resected colorectal liver metastases integrating pathological features, RAS mutation and Immunoscore. J Pathol Clin Res. 2021;7(1):27–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Galjart B, Nierop PMH, van der Stok EP, et al. Angiogenic desmoplastic histopathological growth pattern as a prognostic marker of good outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Angiogenesis. 2019;22(2):355–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-019-09661-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mentha G, Terraz S, Morel P, et al. Dangerous halo after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and two-step hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2009;96(1):95–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nierop PMH, Galjart B, Höppener DJ, et al. Salvage treatment for recurrences after first resection of colorectal liver metastases: the impact of histopathological growth patterns. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2019;36(2):109–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-019-09960-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Nierop PMH, Höppener DJ, van der Stok EP, et al. Histopathological growth patterns and positive margins after resection of colorectal liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2020;22(6):911–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kokudo N, Miki Y, Sugai S, et al. Genetic and histological assessment of surgical margins in resected liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma: minimum surgical margins for successful resection. Arch Surg. 2002;137(7):833–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.7.833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hamady ZZ, Lodge JP, Welsh FK, et al. One-millimeter cancer-free margin is curative for colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score case-match approach. Ann Surg. 2014;259(3):543–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182902b6e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Vigano L, Di Tommaso L, Mimmo A, et al. Prospective evaluation of intrahepatic microscopic occult tumor foci in patients with numerous colorectal liver metastases. Dig Surg. 2019;36(4):340–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rajaganeshan R, Prasad R, Guillou PJ, et al. The influence of invasive growth pattern and microvessel density on prognosis in colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(7):1112–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Fiz F, Viganò L, Gennaro N, et al. Radiomics of Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(10):2881. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Costa G, Cavinato L, Masci C, et al. Virtual biopsy for diagnosis of chemotherapy-associated liver injuries and steatohepatitis: a combined radiomic and clinical model in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(12):3077. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13123077 (PMID: 34203103).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Vigano L, Sollini M, Ieva F, Fiz F, Torzilli G. Chemotherapy-associated liver injuries: unmet needs and new insights for surgical oncologists. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(8):4074–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10069-z (PMID: 33929618).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cheng J, Wei J, Tong T, et al. Prediction of histopathologic growth patterns of colorectal liver metastases with a noninvasive imaging method. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(13):4587–98. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07910-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Han Y, Chai F, Wei J, et al. Identification of predominant histopathological growth patterns of colorectal liver metastasis by multi-habitat and multi-sequence based radiomics analysis. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01363.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Torzilli MD, PhD, FACS, FAFC(Hon).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viganò, L., Branciforte, B., Laurenti, V. et al. The Histopathological Growth Pattern of Colorectal Liver Metastases Impacts Local Recurrence Risk and the Adequate Width of the Surgical Margin. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 5515–5524 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11717-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11717-8

Navigation