Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ASO Author Reflections: Technical Standards for Cancer Surgery: From “How I Do It” to “How We Do It”

  • ASO Author Reflections
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nelson, H. American College of Surgeons, and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Operative standards for cancer surgery. 2015, Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health. xxxiii, 332 pages.

  2. Katz MH, American College of Surgeons, ACS Clinical Research Program. Operative standards for cancer surgery volume 2. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2018.

  3. Zhao B, et al. Adherence to surgical and oncologic standards improves survival in breast cancer patients. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(2):148–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao B, et al. Adherence with operative standards in the treatment of gastric cancer in the United States. Gastric Cancer. 2020;23(3):550–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith TJ, Hillner BE. Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(11):2886–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Optimal Resources for Cancer Care 2020, updated February 2021, available at: https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/quality-programs/cancer/coc/optimal_resources_for_cancer_care_2020_standards.ashx. Accessed January 28, 2022.

  7. Hieken TJ, Burns WB, Francescatti AB, Morris AM, Wong SL. Technical standards for cancer surgery: improving patient care through synoptic operative reporting. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11330-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz MH, Hunt KK, Francescatti AB. Technical Standards for Cancer Surgery: Commission on Cancer Standards 5.3 – 5.8. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11375-w.

  9. Stogryn, et al. Advancement in the quality of operative documentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of synoptic versus narrative operative reporting. Am J Surg. 2019;218(3):624–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA

    Amanda B. Francescatti MS

  2. Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Kelly K. Hunt MD, FACS

  3. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Matthew H. G. Katz MD, FACS

Authors
  1. Amanda B. Francescatti MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kelly K. Hunt MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew H. G. Katz MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the Cancer Surgery Standards Program of the American College of Surgeons

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly K. Hunt MD, FACS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Kelly Hunt: Medical Advisory Board - Armada Health, research funding to my institution - Cairn Surgical, Eli Lilly & Co., Lumicell.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Francescatti, A.B., Hunt, K.K., Katz, M.H.G. et al. ASO Author Reflections: Technical Standards for Cancer Surgery: From “How I Do It” to “How We Do It”. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 6559–6560 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11518-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11518-z

Search

Navigation