Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of the Ratio of Visceral Fat Area (VFA) to Psoas Muscle Area (PMA) (V/P Ratio) on Survival for Surgically Resected Esophageal Cancer

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The synergic effects of muscle mass reduction with excess body adiposity in surgically resected esophageal cancer (EC) patients remains controversial, especially in non-obese patients.

Methods

One hundred and six patients with EC who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2014 were included in this study. Reduction in muscle mass and excess body adiposity were defined as the ratio of visceral fat area (VFA) to psoas muscle area (PMA) (V/P ratio) on the same axial computed tomography (CT) slice at the third lumbar vertebra (L3).

Results

A high V/P ratio was associated with greater age (p = 0.03), higher body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), higher VFA (p < 0.001), and increased age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) (p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed a high V/P ratio to be an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival (OS) in EC patients who underwent surgery (p = 0.003). The prognostic value of the V/P ratio was still significant in EC patients with a BMI < 25.

Conclusions

A high V/P ratio was associated with poor survival in surgically resected EC patients, even in non-obese patients. The V/P ratio as a surrogate marker of relative muscle mass reduction and fat accumulation may have prognostic value in EC patients regardless of body composition differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ying H-Q, Deng Q-W, He B-S, et al. The prognostic value of preoperative NLR, d-NLR, PLR and LMR for predicting clinical outcome in surgical colorectal cancer patients. Med Oncol. 2014;31(12):305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0305-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levolger S, Van Vugt JLA, De Bruin RWF, IJzermans JNM. Systematic review of sarcopenia in patients operated on for gastrointestinal and hep. Br J Surg. 2015;102(12):1448–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(17):1625–38. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa021423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barazzoni R, Bischoff SC, Boirie Y, et al. Sarcopenic obesity: time to meet the challenge. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(6):1787–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.04.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Silveira EA, da Filho RRS, Spexoto MCB, Haghighatdoost F, Sarrafzadegan N, de Oliveira C. The role of sarcopenic obesity in cancer and cardiovascular disease: a synthesis of the evidence on pathophysiological aspects and clinical implications. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9):4339. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS22094339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(7):629–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70153-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reisinger KW, Bosmans JWAM, Uittenbogaart M, et al. Loss of skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy predicts postoperative mortality in esophageal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4445–52. https://doi.org/10.1245/S10434-015-4558-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Onishi S, Tajika M, Tanaka T, et al. Prognostic impact of sarcopenic obesity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2974. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM9092974.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. New criteria for “obesity disease” in Japan. Circ J. 2002;66(11):987–92. https://doi.org/10.1253/CIRCJ.66.987

  10. Gu W-S, Fang W-Z, Liu C-Y, et al. Prognostic significance of combined pretreatment body mass index (BMI) and BMI loss in patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:3029–41. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S197820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakai M, Sohda M, Saito H, et al. Comparative analysis of immunoinflammatory and nutritional measures in surgically resected esophageal cancer: a single-center retrospective study. In Vivo. 2020;34(2):881–7. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11853.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rusch VW, Rice TW, Crowley J, Blackstone EH, Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P. The seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Staging Manuals: the new era of data-driven revisions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(4):819–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.02.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park JW, Koh DH, Jang WS, et al. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index as a prognostic factor for radical prostatectomy outcomes of very high-risk prostate cancer patients. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0199365. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0199365.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1974;19(6):716–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48(3):452–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Elliott JA, Doyle SL, Murphy CF, et al. Sarcopenia: prevalence, and impact on operative and oncologic outcomes in the multimodal management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2017;266(5):822–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong S, Choi KM. Sarcopenic obesity, insulin resistance, and their implications in cardiovascular and metabolic consequences. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(2):494. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS21020494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalyani RR, Corriere M, Ferrucci L. Age-related and disease-related muscle loss: the effect of diabetes, obesity, and other diseases. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(10):819–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70034-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq034.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makoto Sohda MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Fig. 1.

Kaplan–Meier curves for cancer-specific survival according to the V/P ratio (PPTX 79 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2.

Kaplan–Meier curves for disease-free survival according to the V/P ratio (PPTX 77 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3.

Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival in patients who were underweight (BMI < 19) according to the V/P ratio (PPTX 73 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakai, M., Sohda, M., Uchida, S. et al. Impact of the Ratio of Visceral Fat Area (VFA) to Psoas Muscle Area (PMA) (V/P Ratio) on Survival for Surgically Resected Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 4465–4471 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11497-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11497-1

Keywords

Navigation