Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure
Crolla, Verheijen, and Consten receive fees from Intuitive Surgical. No funding was received for this study. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Burghgraef, T.A., Hol, J.C., Rutgers, M.L. et al. ASO Visual Abstract: Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Versus Transanal Low Anterior Resection: 3-Year Oncologic Results of a Population-Based Cohort in Experienced Centers. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 1921–1922 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10894-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10894-2