References
Abrial SC, Penault-Llorca F, Delva R, et al. High prognostic significance of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study in 710 patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;94:255–63.
Kaufmann M, Hortobagyi GN, Goldhirsch A, et al. Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1940–9.
Xie L, Li X, Wang Q, et al. Effects of core needle biopsy and subsequent neoadjuvant chemotherapy on molecular alterations and outcome in breast cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:677–85.
Penault-Llorca F, Radosevic-Robin N. Biomarkers of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13:487–503.
van de Ven S, Smit VT, Dekker TJ, Nortier JW, Kroep JR. Discordances in ER, PR, and HER2 receptors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37:422–30.
Mohan SC, Walcott-Sapp S, Lee MK, et al. Alterations in breast cancer biomarkers following neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09814-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure
There are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohan, S.C., Chung, A. ASO Author Reflections: Biomarker Changes After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Do They Matter?. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 5918–5919 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09890-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09890-3