Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care

  • Global Health Services Research
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Healthcare policies have focused on centralizing care to high-volume centers in an effort to optimize patient outcomes; however, little is known about patients’ and caregivers’ considerations and selection process when selecting hospitals for care. We aim to explore how patients and caregivers select hospitals for complex cancer care and to develop a taxonomy for their selection considerations.

Methods

This was a qualitative study in which data were gathered from in-depth interviews conducted from March to November 2019 among patients with hepatopancreatobiliary cancers who were scheduled to undergo a pancreatectomy (n = 20) at a metropolitan, urban regional, or suburban medical center and their caregivers (n = 10).

Results

The interviews revealed six broad domains that characterized hospital selection considerations: hospital factors, team characteristics, travel distance to hospital, referral or recommendation, continuity of care, and insurance considerations. The identified domains were similar between participants seen at the metropolitan center and urban/suburban medical centers, with the following exceptions: participants receiving care specifically at the metropolitan center noted operative volume and access to specific services such as clinical trials in their hospital selection; participants receiving care at urban/suburban centers noted health insurance considerations and having access to existing medical records in their hospital selection.

Conclusions

This study delineates the many considerations of patients and caregivers when selecting hospitals for complex cancer care. These identified domains should be incorporated into the development and implementation of centralization policies to help increase patient access to high-quality cancer care that is consistent with their priorities and needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Commission on Cancer: Cancer Program Accreditation: Categories of Approval. 2016. http://www.facs.org/cancer/coc/categories.html. 2016.

  2. Damman OC, Hendriks M, Rademakers J, et al. How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Proposed Decision Memo for Bariatric Surgery for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity - Facility Certification Requirement (CAG-00250R3) 2013. https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-proposed-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=266. Accessed 10 Jul 2018.

  4. Fong ZV, Chang DC, Hur C, et al. Variation in long-term oncologic outcomes by type of cancer center accreditation: an analysis of a SEER-Medicare population with pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg. 2020;220(1):29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chau Z, West JK, Zhou Z, et al. Rankings versus reality in pancreatic cancer surgery: a real-world comparison. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:528–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2327–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coe TM, Fong ZV, Wilson SE, et al. Outcomes improvement is not continuous along the learning curve for pancreaticoduodenectomy at the hospital level. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:2132–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoag JR, Resio BJ, Monsalve AF, et al. Differential safety between top-ranked cancer hospitals and their affiliates for complex cancer surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e191912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sternberg S. Hospitals Move to Limit Low-Volume Surgeries. U.S. News & World Report. 2015. https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/05/19/hospitals-move-to-limit-low-volume-surgeries. Accessed 10 Jun 2020.

  11. Dimick JB, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, et al. Bariatric surgery complications before vs after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to centers of excellence. JAMA. 2013;309:792–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fong ZV, Hashimoto DA, Jin G, et al. Simulated Volume-Based Regionalization of Complex Procedures: Impact on Spatial Access to Care. Ann Surg. Epub 21 Aug 2019.

  13. Jacobs RC, Groth S, Farjah F, et al. Potential impact of “Take the Volume Pledge” on access and outcomes for gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2019;270:1079–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fong ZV, Loehrer AP, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, et al. Potential impact of a volume pledge on spatial access: a population-level analysis of patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2017;162:203–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McDermott J, Zeymo A, Chan K, et al. Affordable care act’s medicaid expansion and use of regionalized surgery at high-volume hospitals. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;227:507–520.e9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15:398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Bridges JF, et al. Choosing a cancer surgeon: analyzing factors in patient decision making using a best-worst scaling methodology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3732–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Resio BJ, Chiu AS, Hoag JR, et al. Motivators, barriers, and facilitators to traveling to the safest hospitals in the United States for complex cancer surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e184595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Victoor A, Delnoij D, Friele R, et al. Why patients may not exercise their choice when referred for hospital care. An exploratory study based on interviews with patients. Health Expect. 2016;19:667–78.

  20. Hibbard JH, Slovic P, Jewett JJ. Informing consumer decisions in health care: implications from decision-making research. Milbank Q. 1997;75:395–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, et al. The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA. 2000;283:1866–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dealey C. The factors that influence patients’ choice of hospital and treatment. Br J Nurs. 2005;14:576–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moser A, Korstjens I, van der Weijden T, et al. Patient’s decision making in selecting a hospital for elective orthopaedic surgery. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16:1262–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Victoor A, Delnoij DM, Friele RD, et al. Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2618–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson CT, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Choosing where to have major surgery: who makes the decision? Arch Surg. 2007;142:242–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer S, Pelka S, Riedl R. Understanding patients’ decision-making strategies in hospital choice: literature review and a call for experimental research. Cogent Psychol. 2015;2:116758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ward WH, DeMora L, Handorf E, et al. Preoperative delays in the treatment of DCIS and the associated incidence of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(2):386–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaltenmeier C, Shen C, Medich DS, et al. Time to surgery and colon cancer survival in the United States. Ann Surg. Epub 10 Dec 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003745

  30. Turaga KK, Girotra S. Are we harming cancer patients by delaying their cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic? Ann Surg. Epub 2 Jun 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003967

  31. Murphy JE, Wo JY, Ryan DP, et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX followed by individualized chemoradiotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:963–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Michelakos T, Pergolini I, Castillo CF, et al. Predictors of resectability and survival in patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Ann Surg. 2019;269:733–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, et al. Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care. 1999;37:204–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Diaz A, Burns S, Paredes AZ, et al. Accessing surgical care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: patient variation in travel distance and choice to bypass hospitals to reach higher volume centers. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120:1318–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sheetz KH, Dimick JB, Nathan H. Centralization of high-risk cancer surgery within existing hospital systems. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:3234–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Healy MA, Krell RW, Abdelsattar ZM, et al. Pancreatic resection results in a statewide surgical collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2468–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lamb BW, Green JS, Benn J, et al. Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:412–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Congress EP, Lyons BP. Cultural differences in health beliefs: implications for social work practice in health care settings. Soc Work Health Care. 1992;17:81–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Spector RE. Cultural diversity in health and illness. J Transcult Nurs 2002;13:197–9 (discussion 200–1).

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by National Cancer Institute of the National Institute of Health (Grant No. F32CA217455).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi Ven Fong MD, MPH.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fong, Z.V., Lim, PW., Hendrix, R. et al. Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 4183–4192 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09506-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09506-2

Navigation