References
D’Alonzo M, Martincich L, Biglia N, et al. Clinical and radiological predictors of nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2311–8.
Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, et al. The oncological safety of skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249:461–8.
Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple–areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114:97–101.
Dent BL, Miller JA, Eden DJ, et al. Tumor-to-nipple distance as a predictor of nipple involvement: expanding the inclusion criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:1e–8e.
Wu ZY, Kim HJ, Lee J, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer and tumor-to-nipple distance ≤ 1 cm: a matched-cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09427-0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure
There are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, ZY., Han, J., Eom, J.S. et al. ASO Author Reflections: Do Shorter Tumor-to-Nipple Distances Compromise the Local Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 4292–4293 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09453-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09453-y