Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinicopathological Significance of Pathologic Complete Lymph Node Regression After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pathologic complete lymph node regression (LNR), where the lymph nodes show evidence of neoadjuvant treatment effect but have no viable residual tumor cells, is sometimes observed following neoadjuvant treatments and has been shown to be prognostic; conflicting results exist in the current literature.

Methods

Patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by esophagectomy for squamous carcinoma (ESCC) were retrospectively reviewed and classified according to their LNR score; 0: N(−) with no evidence of tumor involvement or regression; 1: N(−) with evidence of complete regression; 2: N(+) with < 50% viable tumor; and 3: N(+) with > 50% viable tumor.

Results

In total, 136 patients, comprising 73, 25, 16, and 22 patients with LNR scores of 0, 1, 2, or 3, respectively, were included. Pathologic complete LNR (LNR 1) was significantly associated with lower risks of lymphovascular invasion (0%, < 0.001) and perineural invasion (4%, = 0.038), and a higher rate of pathologic complete response in the primary tumor (76%, < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rates were 42.1%, 52.8%, and 8.0% in patients with an LNR score of 0, 1, and 2/3, respectively (< 0.001). There was no significant difference between patients with LNR scores of 0 and 1 in overall survival (= 0.454), disease-free survival (p = 0.501), and cumulative incidence of recurrences (hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.432–1.623, = 0.601).

Conclusions

Pathologic complete LNR could be an indicator of nCRT sensitivity and can be regarded as a good prognostic factor in patients with ESCC.

Graphic Abstract

In the survival curve analysis that included patients with lymph node regression (LNR) scores of 0 (blue), 1 (red), and 2/3 (green), we found that patients with pathologic complete LNR (LNR 1), which suggests prior positive nodal involvement, had similar outcomes as those without evidence of prior tumor involvement in lymph node (LNR0).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jang R, Darling G, Wong RK. Multimodality approaches for the curative treatment of esophageal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13:229–-238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hölscher AH, Drebber U, Schmidt H, et al. Prognostic classification of histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2014;260:779–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger AC, Farma J, Scott WJ, et al. Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is associated with significantly improved survival. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4330–4337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tong DK, Law S, Kwong DL, et al. Histological regression of squamous esophageal carcinoma assessed by percentage of residual viable cells after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an important prognostic factor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2184–2192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nieman DR, Peyre CG, Watson TJ, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment response in negative nodes is an important prognosticator after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Philippron A, Bollschweiler E, Kunikata A, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymph node regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;28:549–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davies AR, Myoteri D, Zylstra J, et al. Lymph node regression and survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2018;105:1639–1649.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kadota T, Hatogai K, Yano T, et al. Pathological tumor regression grade of metastatic tumors in lymph node predicts prognosis in esophageal cancer patients. Cancer Sci. 2018;109:2046–2055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chirieac LR, Swisher SG, Ajani JA, et al. Posttherapy pathologic stage predicts survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiation. Cancer. 2005;103:1347–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Groth SS, Burt BM, Farjah F, et al. Prognostic value of neoadjuvant treatment response in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157:1682–1693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Urakawa S, Makino T, Yamasaki M, et al. Lymph Node Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chien HC, Chen HS, Wu SC, et al. The prognostic value of metastatic lymph node number and ratio in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50:337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Robb WB, Dahan L, Mornex F, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on lymph node status in esophageal cancer: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;261:902–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rice TW, Patil DT, Blackstone EH. 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6:119–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoon YC, Lee KS, Shim YM, et al. Metastasis to regional lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: CT versus FDG PET for presurgical detection prospective study. Radiology. 2003;227:764–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Hsin-Yi Huang from the Biostatistics Task Force, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, for statistical assistance.

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Po-Kuei Hsu MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

DISCLOSURES

Po-Kuei Hsu, Yi-Chen Yeh, Ling-I Chien, Chien-Sheng Huang, and Han-Shui Hsu have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 895 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsu, PK., Yeh, YC., Chien, LI. et al. Clinicopathological Significance of Pathologic Complete Lymph Node Regression After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 2048–2058 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09363-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09363-z

Navigation