Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Adherence to NCCN Guidelines for Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer Patients: Who Are We Missing?

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Genetic predisposition accounts for 5–10% of all breast cancers (BC) diagnosed. NCCN guidelines help providers identify appropriate candidates for counseling and testing. Concerns about underutilization of genetic testing have spurred interest in broader peri-diagnostic testing. We evaluated surgeon adherence to NCCN guidelines and studied patterns of testing in newly diagnosed BC patients.

Methods

A total of 397 patients were identified with newly diagnosed BC treated at our institution between 2016 and 2017 with no prior genetic testing. Eligibility for genetic testing based on NCCN criteria, referral, and patient compliance were recorded.

Results

In total, 212 of 397 (53%) met NCCN testing criteria. Fifty-nine of 212 (28%) patients went untested despite meeting one or more criteria. Fourteen of 59 (24%) of these were referred but did not comply. Most common criteria for meeting eligibility for testing both in the overall cohort and among missed patients were family history-based. Age > 45 years old and non-Ashkenazi Jewish descent were predictive of missed referral (p < 0.01). We identified pathogenic mutations in 16 of 153 (10%) patients who did undergo testing (11 (7%) BRCA1 or 2 and 5 (3%) with other predisposition gene mutations) or 16 of 397 (4%) among the overall group.

Conclusions

Our data highlight the underutilization of genetic testing. Even in the setting of a full-service breast center with readily available genetic counseling, there is a substantial miss rate for identifying eligible patients, related to assessment of family history, patient age, and ethnicity, as well as patient compliance. Broader peri-diagnostic testing should be considered, and higher compliance rates with patients referred should be sought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society: Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2017-2018. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures-2017-2018.pdf.

  2. DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(1):52–62. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lokich E, Stuckey A, Raker C, Wilbur JS, Laprise J, Gass J. Preoperative genetic testing affects surgical decision making in breast cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:326–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwarts GF, Hughes KS, Lynch HT et al. Proceeding of the international consensus conference on breast cancer risk, genetics and risk management, April 2007. Cancer. 2008:113:2627–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pharoah PD, Antoniou A, Bobrow M, Zimmern RL, Easton DF, Ponder BA. Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention. Nat Genet. 2002;31:33–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh T, Lee MK, Casadei S, et al. Detection of inherited pathogenic variants for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010:107:12629–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Walsh T, King MC. Ten genes for inherited breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2007:11:103–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Groep P, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ. Pathology of hereditary breast cancer. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2011:34:71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Genetic/Familial High Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic. Version 1.2020—Dec 04, 2019. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_bop.pdf.

  10. Guo F, Hirth J, Lin YL, et al. Use of BRCA mutation test in the U.S., 2004–2014. Am J Prev Med. 2017:52(6):702–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo F, Scholl M, Fuchs EL, Berenson AB, Kuo YF. BRCA testing in unaffected young women in the United States, 2006–2017. Cancer. 2020:15;126(2):337–43.

  12. Yang S, Axilbund JE, O’Leary E, et al. Underdiagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Medicare patients: genetic testing criteria miss the mark. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25:2925–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Matro JM, Ruth KJ, Wong YN, et al. Cost sharing and hereditary cancer risk: predictors of willingness-to-pay for genetic testing. J Genet Couns. 2014;23:1002–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurian A, Kent G, Hamilton A, et al. Genetic testing and counseling among patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. JAMA. 2017; 317(5):531–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Childers C, Childers KK, Maggard-Gibbons M, Macinko J. National estimates of genetic testing in women with a history of breast or ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(34):3800–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes K. Genetic testing: what problem are we trying to solve? J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35:3789–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown KL, Hutchinson R, Zinberg RE, McGovern MM. Referral and experience with genetic testing among women with early onset breast cancer. Genet Test. 2005;9:301–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stuckey A, Febbraro T, Laprise J, et al. Adherence patters to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for referral of women with breast cancer to genetic professionals. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016;39:363–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Assessing the Status of BRCA testing and the challenges faced by Cancer Care Teams in the Community: summary of survey findings. April 2018. https://www.accc-cancer.org/docs/projects/brca/brca-initiative_survey-summary_final-v2.pdf?sfvrsn=80fe0ffb_2.

  20. Narod S, Akbari MR. Population-based genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(5):517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kishan A, Gomez C, Dawson N, et al. Increasing appropriate BRCA1/2 mutation testing: the role of family history documentation and genetic counseling in a multidisciplinary clinic. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23:S634–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Guideline on Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer. 2019. https://www.breastsurgeons.org/docs/statements/Consensus-Guideline-on-Genetic-Testing-for-Hereditary-Breast-Cancer.pdf.

  23. Beitsch P, Whitworth P, Hughes K et al. Underdiagnosis of hereditary breast cancer: are genetic testing guidelines a tool or an obstacle? J Clin Oncol. 2017;37:453–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Raphael J, Verma S, Hewitt P, Eisen A. The impact of Angelina Jolie (AJ)’s story on genetic referral and testing at an academic cancer centre in Canada. J Genet Couns. 2016;25(6):1309–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gabai-Kapara E, Lahad A, Kaufman B, et al. Population-based screening for breast and ovarian cancer risk due to BRCA 1 and BRCA 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(39):14205–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S, et al. The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1401–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Roa BB, Boyd AA, Vocik K, Richards CS. Ashkenazi Jewish population frequencies for common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nat Genet. 1996;14:185–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lieberman S, Tomer A, Ben-Chetrir A, et al. Population screening for BRCA1/BRCA2 founder mutations in Ashkenazi Jews: proactive recruitment compared with self-referral. Genet Med. 2017;19(7):754-62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liberman S, Lahad A, Tomer A, Cohen C, Levy-Lahad E. Population screening for BRCA1/2 mutations: lessons from qualitative analysis of the screening experience. Genet Med. 2017; 19(6):628–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Helwick C. Dr. Marie King proposes population screening in all young women for BRCA mutations. The ASCO post, 2015. http://www.ascopost.com/issues/february-10-2015/dr-mary-claire-king-proposes-population-screening-in-all-young-women-for-brca-mutations/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dubin Breast Center, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA

    J. Jaime Alberty-Oller MD, FACS, Sarah Weltz, Antonio Santos BS, Kereeti Pisapati MS, Meng Ru MS, Christina Weltz MD, Hank Schmidt MD, FACS & Elisa Port MD, FACS

Authors
  1. J. Jaime Alberty-Oller MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Weltz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Santos BS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kereeti Pisapati MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Meng Ru MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christina Weltz MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hank Schmidt MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Elisa Port MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Jaime Alberty-Oller MD, FACS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alberty-Oller, J.J., Weltz, S., Santos, A. et al. Adherence to NCCN Guidelines for Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer Patients: Who Are We Missing?. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 281–286 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09123-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09123-z

Search

Navigation