Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effect of Hospital Volume on Outcomes of Patients with Occult Breast Cancer

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

With limited data in regards to management, occult breast cancer (OBC) poses a challenging surgical scenario. Current surgical management includes axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) with or without mastectomy. We sought to investigate the impact of hospital volume on surgical approach and survival outcomes of patients with OBC.

Methods

Patients with cT0N+ breast cancer were selected from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB, 2004–2014). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), calculated using Kaplan–Meier methods compared according to hospital volume: community cancer center (CC), comprehensive community cancer center (COMP), and academic center (AC). Secondary outcome was the rate of modified radical mastectomy (MRM).

Results

We identified 574 patients with OBC, 11.1% were treated at a CC, 51.8% at a COMP, and 37.0% at an AC. Patients treated at CC had lower socioeconomic status compared with COMP or AC (23.1%, 14.1%, 19.3%; p = 0.005, respectively). There was no difference in access to radiation therapy (p = 0.888) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.221). Patients treated at CC had worse OS compared with COMP or AC (87.04, 105.29, 108.06 mo, p = 0.026, respectively). There was an increased rate of MRM at CC compared with COMP or AC (54.7%, 41.2%, 30.5%, p = 0.003, respectively).

Conclusions

A direct association seems to exist between hospital volume and outcomes of patients with OBC. Patients with OBC treated at AC were more likely to undergo breast-conserving approaches and had better survival than those treated at CC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baron PL, Moore MP, Kinne DW, Candela FC, Osborne MP, Petrek JA. Occult breast cancer presenting with axillary metastases: updated management. Arch Surg. 1990;125(2):210–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vlastos G, Jean ME, Mirza AN, et al. Feasibility of breast preservation in the treatment of occult primary carcinoma presenting with axillary metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8(5):425–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ge L-P, Liu X-Y, Xiao Y, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of occult breast cancer: a SEER population-based study. Cancer Manage Res. 2018;10:4381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Macedo FI, Eid JJ, Flynn J, Jacobs MJ, Mittal VK. Optimal surgical management for occult breast carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(6):1838–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Network NCC. NCCN guidelines version 1. Invasive breast cancer. 2018.

  6. Guller U, Safford S, Pietrobon R, Heberer M, Oertli D, Jain NB. High hospital volume is associated with better outcomes for breast cancer surgery: analysis of 233,247 patients. World J Surg. 2005;29(8):994–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):721–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(6):511–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davoli M, Amato L, Minozzi S, Bargagli A, Vecchi S, Perucci C. Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. 2005.

  10. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen C-S, Liu T-C, Lin H-C, Lien Y-C. Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110(2):349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yen TW, Pezzin LE, Li J, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Nattinger AB. Effect of hospital volume on processes of breast cancer care: a National Cancer Data Base study. Cancer. 2017;123(6):957–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vrijens F, Stordeur S, Beirens K, Devriese S, Van Eycken E, Vlayen J. Effect of hospital volume on processes of care and 5-year survival after breast cancer: a population-based study on 25,000 women. Breast. 2012;21(3):261–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kong AL, Pezzin LE, Nattinger AB. Identifying patterns of breast cancer care provided at high-volume hospitals: a classification and regression tree analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;153(3):689–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cancer ACoSCo. Cancer program standards: ensuring patient-centered care. facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/cancer/coc/2016%20coc%20standards%20manual_interactive%20pdf.ashx. 2016.

  16. Greenup RA, Obeng-Gyasi S, Thomas S, et al. The effect of hospital volume on breast cancer mortality. Ann Surg. 2018;267(2):375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gutierrez JC, Hurley JD, Housri N, et al. Are many community hospitals undertreating breast cancer? Lessons from 24,834 patients. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):154–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. Comparison of Commission on Cancer–approved and–nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4177–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen BL, Collier AL, Kelly KN, et al. Surgical management of the axilla in patients with occult breast cancer (cT0 N+) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020:1–12.

  20. Corradini S, Reitz D, Pazos M, et al. Mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy for early breast cancer in real-life clinical practice: outcome comparison of 7565 cases. Cancers. 2019;11(2):160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hessler LK, Molitoris JK, Rosenblatt PY, et al. Factors influencing management and outcome in patients with occult breast cancer with axillary lymph node involvement: analysis of the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(10):2907–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gooiker G, Van Gijn W, Wouters M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(4):485–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pezzin LE, Laud P, Yen T, Neuner J, Nattinger AB. Re-examining the relationship of breast cancer hospital and surgical volume to mortality: an instrumental variable analysis. Med Care. 2015;53(12):1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camille C. Baumrucker BS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baumrucker, C.C., Spring, S.R., Cohen, B.L. et al. The Effect of Hospital Volume on Outcomes of Patients with Occult Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 2128–2135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09103-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09103-3

Navigation