Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

ASO Author Reflections: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Reconstruction: Postoperative Complications

  • ASO Author Reflections
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Joseph P, Crowe J, Kim JA, Yetman R, Banbury J, Patrick RJ, Baynes D. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139(2):148–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.2.148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith BL, Tang R, Rai U, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(3):361–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral alloderm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(3):232–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000168527.52472.3c

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reitsamer R, Peintinger F. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(2):162–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman BS. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;65(3):371–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198003000-00019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sbitany H, Piper M, Lentz R. Prepectoral breast reconstruction: a safe alternative to submuscular prosthetic reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(3):432–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000003627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sobti N, Weitzman RE, Nealon KP, et al. Evaluation of capsular contracture following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58094-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Braun S, Dreicer M, Butterworth J, Larson K. Do nipple ischemia and necrosis rates differ in pre-pectoral versus sub-muscular implant-based reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08887-8

  9. Krajewski AC, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, et al. Expanded indications and improved outcomes for nipple-sparing mastectomy over time. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(10):3317–23. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4737-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelsey E. Larson MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Larson, K.E., Braun, S. & Butterworth, J.A. ASO Author Reflections: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Reconstruction: Postoperative Complications. Ann Surg Oncol 27 (Suppl 3), 703–704 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08920-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08920-w

Navigation