Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgical Oncology: An Overview of Instruments and Scores

  • Health Services Research and Global Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional measures of quality and effectiveness in surgical oncology have focused on morbidity, mortality, and when available, recurrence rates. Measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has become more widely accepted during the last decade. This article reviews instruments commonly used in the surgical treatment of cancer patients to evaluate PROs. In addition, it discusses the linkage of PROs and health-related quality of life measures with traditional surgical complications and highlights future directions related to the expanding use of PROs in the surgical care of cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. N.C. Institute, Cancer Statistics, 2019. Retrieved 24 Feb 2019 at https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics.

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Waljee JF, Dimick JB. Do patient-reported outcomes correlate with clinical outcomes following surgery? Adv Surg. 51 2017;141–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Committee on Quality Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. Washington DC, National Academy Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chung AE, Basch EM. Potential and challenges of patient-generated health data for high-quality cancer care. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11:195–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Basch E, Iasonos A, McDonough T, Barz A, Culkin A, Kris MG, et al. Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: results of a questionnaire-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:903–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273:59–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Korolija D, Wood-Dauphinee S, Pointner R. Patient-reported outcomes: how important are they? Surg Endosc. 2007;21:503–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pezold ML, Pusic AL, Cohen WA, Hollenberg JP, Butt Z, Flum DR, Temple LK. Defining a research agenda for patient-reported outcomes in surgery: using a Delphi survey of stakeholders. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:930–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Value-Based Purchasing. Retrieved 24 Feb 2019 at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/Hospital-Value-Based-Purchasing-.html.

  12. Bilimoria KY, Cella D, Butt Z. Current challenges in using patient-reported outcomes for surgical care and performance measurement: everybody wants to hear from the patient, but are we ready to listen? JAMA Surg. 2014;149:505–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pusic A, Liu JC, Chen CM, Cano S, Davidge K, Klassen A, et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in head and neck cancer surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:525–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-form general health survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988;26:724–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, Chesterman E, Levi J, Shepherd R, et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34:585–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. EuroQol G. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med. 2001;33:328–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Straatman J, Joosten PJ, Terwee CB, Cuesta MA, Jansma EP, van der Peet DL. Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:760–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Joosten PJ, Terwee CB, Cuesta MA, Jansma EP, van der Peet DL. Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1920–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ilonen IK, Rasanen JV, Knuuttila A, Sihvo EI, Sintonen H, Sovijarvi AR, Salo JA. Quality of life following lobectomy or bilobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a two-year prospective follow-up study. Lung Cancer. 2010;70:347–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Garcia SF, Cella D, Clauser SB, Flynn KE, Lad T, Lai JS, et al. Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5106–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khullar OV, Fernandez FG. Patient-reported outcomes in thoracic surgery. Thorac Surg Clin. 2017;27:279–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones RS, Stukenborg GJ. Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) use in surgical care: a scoping study. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224:245–54 e1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hedrick TL, Harrigan AM, Thiele RH, Friel CM, Kozower BD, Stukenborg GJ. A pilot study of patient-centered outcome assessment using PROMIS for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25:3103–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Khullar OV, Rajaei MH, Force SD, Binongo JN, Lasanajak Y, Robertson S, et al. Pilot study to integrate patient reported outcomes after lung cancer operations into the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104:245–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Blank AT, Lerman DM, Shaw S, Dadrass F, Zhang Y, Liu W. PROMIS((R)) scores in operative metastatic bone disease patients: a multicenter, prospective study. J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:532–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reeve BB, Wang M, Weinfurt K, Flynn KE, Usinger DS, Chen RC. Psychometric evaluation of PROMIS sexual function and satisfaction measures in a longitudinal population-based cohort of men with localized prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1792–810.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Doll KM, Barber EL, Bensen JT, Revilla MC, Snavely AC, Bennett AV, et al. The impact of surgical complications on health-related quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic and gynecologic oncology procedures: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:457 e1–457 e13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82:216–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G. GSRS: a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1988;33:129–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Nieveendijkum EJ, Terwee CB, Oosterveld P, Van Der Meulen JH, Gouma DJ, De Haes JC. Validation of the gastrointestinal quality-of-life index for patients with potentially operable periampullary carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2000;87:110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kulich KR, Madisch A, Pacini F, Pique JM, Regula J, Van Rensburg CJ, et al. Reliability and validity of the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) and quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire in dyspepsia: a six-country study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al., The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gazala S, Pelletier JS, Storie D, Johnson JA, Kutsogiannis DJ, Bedard EL. A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess patient-reported outcomes after lung cancer surgery. Sci World J. 2013;2013:789625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pompili C, Velikova G, White J, Callister M, Robson J, Dixon S, et al. Poor preoperative patient-reported quality of life is associated with complications following pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51:526–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Soo Hoo S, Marriott N, Houlton A, Nevin J, Balega J, Singh K, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after extensive (ultraradical) surgery for ovarian cancer: results from a prospective longitudinal feasibility study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25:1599–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cowan RA, Suidan RS, Andikyan V, Rezk YA, Einstein MH, Chang K, et al. Electronic patient-reported outcomes from home in patients recovering from major gynecologic cancer surgery: a prospective study measuring symptoms and health-related quality of life. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143:362–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Boyes H, Barraclough J, Ratansi R, Rogers SN, Kanatas A. Structured review of the patient-reported outcome instruments used in clinical trials in head and neck surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56:161–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kupsch J, Kuhn M, Matzel KE, Zimmer J, Radulova-Mauersberger O, Sims A, et al. To what extent is the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) associated with quality of life as measured using the EORTC C30 and CR38 quality-of-life questionnaires? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34:747–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Babin E, Sigston E, Hitier M, Dehesdin D, Marie JP, Choussy O. Quality of life in head and neck cancers patients: predictive factors, functional, and psychosocial outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265:265–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lagendijk M, van Egdom LSE, Richel C, van Leeuwen N, Verhoef C, Lingsma HF, Koppert LB. Patient-reported outcome measures in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:963–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Chou C, Harle MT, Morrissey M, Engstrom MC. Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer. 2000;89:1634–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shi Q, Wang XS, Vaporciyan AA, Rice DC, Popat KU, Cleeland CS. Patient-reported symptom interference as a measure of postsurgery functional recovery in lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2016;52:822–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Armbruster SD, Sun CC, Westin SN, Bodurka DC, Ramondetta L, Meyer LA, Soliman PT. Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic cancer patients before and after pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 2018;149:484–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kukreja JB, Shi Q, Chang CM, Seif MA, Sterling BM, Chen TY. Patient-reported outcomes are associated with enhanced recovery status in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy. Surg Innov. 2018;25:242–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Meyer LA, Shi Q, Lasala J, Iniesta MD, Lin HK, Nick AM, et al. Comparison of patient-reported symptom burden on an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) care pathway in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing primary vs interval tumor reductive surgery. Gynecolo Oncol. 2019;152:501–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Day RW, Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Fielder S, Calhoun J, Conrad C, et al. Patient-reported outcomes accurately measure the value of an enhanced recovery program in liver surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:1023–30 e1-2.

    Google Scholar 

  49. de Haes JC, van Knippenberg FC, Neijt JP. Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. Br J Cancer. 1990;62:1034–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Montazeri A, McEwen J, Gillis CR. Quality of life in patients with ovarian cancer: current state of research. Support Care Cancer. 1996;4:169–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kovacic T, Kovacic M. Impact of relaxation training according to Yoga In Daily Life(R) system on perceived stress after breast cancer surgery. Integr Cancer Ther. 2011;10:16–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hall A, A’Hern R, Fallowfield L. Are we using appropriate self-report questionnaires for detecting anxiety and depression in women with early breast cancer? Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:79–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. van Heijl M, Sprangers MA, de Boer AG, Lagarde SM, Reitsma HB, Busch OR, et al. Preoperative and early postoperative quality of life predict survival in potentially curable patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:23–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. de Boer AG, van Lanschot JJ, van Sandick JW, Hulscher JB, Stalmeier PF, de Haes JC, et al. Quality of life after transhiatal compared with extended transthoracic resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4202–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. De Boer AG, Genovesi PI, Sprangers MA, Van Sandick JW, Obertop H, Van Lanschot JJ. Quality of life in long-term survivors after curative transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1716–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ribi K, Bernhard J, Schuller JC, Weder W, Bodis S, Jorger M; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research. Individual versus standard quality-of-life assessment in a phase II clinical trial in mesothelioma patients: feasibility and responsiveness to clinical changes. Lung Cancer. 2008;61:398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Allen-Mersh TG, Glover C, Fordy C, Henderson DC, Davies M. Relation between depression and circulating immune products in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. J R Soc Med. 1998;91:408–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Davies J, Johnston D, Sue-Ling H, Young S, May J, Griffith J, et al. Total or subtotal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma? A study of quality of life. World J Surg. 1998;22:1048–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:570–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Christensen JF, Simonsen C, Banck-Petersen A, Thorsen-Streit S, Herrstedt A, Djurhuus SS, et al. Safety and feasibility of preoperative exercise training during neoadjuvant treatment before surgery for adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction. BJS Open. 2019;3:74–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Palma DA, Nguyen TK, Louie AV, Malthaner R, Fortin D, Rodrigues GB, et al. Measuring the integration of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy plus surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:681–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Lee HH, Chiu CC, Lin JJ, Wang JJ, Lee KT, Sun DP, Shi HY. Impact of preoperative anxiety and depression on quality of life before and after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Affect Disord. 2019;246:361–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sato N, Hasegawa Y, Saito A, Motoi F, Ariake K, Katayose Y, et al. Association between chronological depressive changes and physical symptoms in postoperative pancreatic cancer patients. Biopsychosoc Med. 2018;12:13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Delaloge S, Cella D, Ye Y, Buyse M, Chan A, Barrios CH, et al. Effects of neratinib on health-related quality-of-life in women with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: longitudinal analyses from the randomized phase III ExteNET trial. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:567–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Downing A, Glaser AW, Finan PJ, Wright P, Thomas JD, Gilbert A, et al. Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after curative treatment for rectal cancer: a population-level study in England. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;103:1132–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Iravani K, Jafari P, Akhlaghi A, Khademi B. Assessing whether EORTC QLQ-30 and FACT-G measure the same constructs of quality of life in patients with total laryngectomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16:183.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Dellabella M, Branchi A, Gasparri L, Claudini R, Castellani D. Oncological safety and quality of life in men undergoing simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder tumor and prostate: results from a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol. 2018;36:1629–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. N. C. Institute. The PRO-CTCAE Measurement System, 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019 at https://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/pro-ctcae/background.html.

  69. Basch E, Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Clauser SB, Minasian LM, Dueck AC, et al. Development of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:dju244.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. N.C. Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), 2018. Retrieved xxxx at https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm#ctc_50. Accessed 30 Apr 2019.

  71. N.C. Institute, Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Retrieved 01 April 2019 at https://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/pro-ctcae/measurement.html.

  72. Basch E, Pugh SL, Dueck AC, Mitchell SA, Berk L, Fogh S, et al. Feasibility of patient reporting of symptomatic adverse events via the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in a chemoradiotherapy cooperative group multicenter clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98:409–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Basch E, Dueck AC, Rogak LJ, Mitchell SA, Minasian LM, Denicoff AM, et al. Feasibility of implementing the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse Events in a multicenter trial: NCCTG N1048. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:3120–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Chung AE, Shoenbill K, Mitchell SA, Dueck AC, Schrag D, Bruner DW, Minasian LM, et al. Patient free text reporting of symptomatic adverse events in cancer clinical research using the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019;26:276–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Ancker JS, Stabile C, Carter J, Chen LY, Stein D, Stetson PD, Vickers AJ, et al. Informing, reassuring, or alarming? Balancing patient needs in the development of a postsurgical symptom reporting system in cancer. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018;2018:166–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Liu JB, Pusic AL, Matroniano A, Aryal R, Willarson PB, Hall BL, et al. First report of a multiphase pilot to measure patient-reported outcomes in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018;45:319–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Tevis SE, James TA, Kuerer HM, Pusic AL, Yao KA, Merlino J, Dietz J. Patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2839–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Breast cancer and reconstruction: normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:1046e–55e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Thewes B, Zachariae R, Christensen S, Nielsen T, Butow P. The concerns about recurrence questionnaire: validation of a brief measure of fear of cancer recurrence amongst Danish and Australian breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surv. 2015;9:68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Buchanan PJ, Abdulghani M, Waljee JF, Kozlow JH, Sabel MS, Newman LA, et al. An analysis of the decisions made for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:29–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Jay M, Creelman B, Baliski C. Patient-reported outcomes associated with surgical intervention for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2019. Epub ahead of print.

  83. Bakx R, Sprangers MA, Oort FJ, van Tets WF, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Lanschot JJ. Development and validation of a colorectal functional outcome questionnaire. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20:126–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Thyo A, Emmertsen KJ, Pinkney TD, Christensen P, Laurberg S. The colostomy impact score: development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for rectal cancer patients with a permanent colostomy: a population-based study. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:O25–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012;255:922–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Pieniowski EHA, Palmer GJ, Juul T, Lagergren P, Johar A, Emmertsen KJ, et al. Low Anterior resection syndrome and quality of life after sphincter-sparing rectal cancer surgery: a long-term longitudinal follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62:14–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Allvin R, Ehnfors M, Rawal N, Svensson E, Idvall E. Development of a questionnaire to measure patient-reported postoperative recovery: content validity and intra-patient reliability. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:411–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Jakobsson J, Idvall E, Kumlien C. Patient characteristics and surgery-related factors associated with patient-reported recovery at 1 and 6 months after colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer Care Engl. 2017;26:e12715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Nakamura M, Kido Y, Yano M, Hosoya Y. Reliability and validity of a new scale to assess postoperative dysfunction after resection of upper gastrointestinal carcinoma. Surg Today. 2005;35:535–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Korenaga D, Orita H, Okuyama T, Moriguchi S, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K. Quality of life after gastrectomy in patients with carcinoma of the stomach. Br J Surg. 1992;79:248–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Wu CW, Hsieh MC, Lo SS, Lui WY, P’Eng FK. Quality of life of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy. World J Surg. 1997;21:777–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Smith AB, Basch E. Role of patient-reported outcomes in postsurgical monitoring in oncology. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13:535–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Waljee JF, Ghaferi A, Finks JF, Cassidy R, Varban O, Carlin A, et al. Variation in patient-reported outcomes across hospitals following surgery. Med Care. 2015;53:960–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Doll KM, Snavely AC, Kalinowski A, Irwin DE, Bensen JT, Bae-Jump V, et al. Preoperative quality of life and surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology patients: a new predictor of operative risk? Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133:546–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Fink CA, Friedrich M, Frey PE, Radeker L, Leuck A, Bruckner T, et al. Prospective multicentre cohort study of patient-reported outcomes and complications following major abdominal neoplastic surgery (PATRONUS): study protocol for a CHIR-Net student-initiated German medical audit study (CHIR-Net SIGMA study). BMC Surg. 2018;18:90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (UM1 CA233080-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra L. Wong MD, MS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors have no relevant disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phillips, J.D., Wong, S.L. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgical Oncology: An Overview of Instruments and Scores. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 45–53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07752-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07752-7

Navigation