Skip to main content


Log in

Is Breast-Conserving Therapy Appropriate for Male Breast Cancer Patients? A National Cancer Database Analysis

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript



Current treatment guidelines for male breast cancer are predominantly guided by female-only clinical trials. With scarce research, it is unclear whether breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is equivalent to mastectomy in men. We sought to compare overall survival (OS) among male breast cancer patients who underwent BCT versus mastectomy.


We performed a retrospective analysis of 8445 stage I–II (T1–2 N0–1 M0) male breast cancer patients from the National Cancer Database (2004–2014). Patients were grouped according to surgical and radiation therapy (RT). BCT was defined as partial mastectomy followed by RT. Multivariable and inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare OS between treatment groups, controlling for demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics.


Most patients underwent total mastectomy (61.2%), whereas 18.2% underwent BCT, 12.4% underwent total mastectomy with RT, and 8.2% underwent partial mastectomy alone. In multivariable and IPTW models, partial mastectomy alone, total mastectomy alone, and total mastectomy with RT were associated with worse OS compared with BCT (p < 0.001 all). Ten-year OS was 73.8% for BCT and 56.3, 58.0 and 56.3% for other treatment approaches. Older age, higher T/N stage, histological grade, and triple-negative receptor status were associated with poorer OS (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis by stage demonstrated similar results.


In this national sample of male breast cancer patients, BCT was associated with greater survival. The underlying mechanisms of this association warrant further study, because more routine adoption of BCT in male breast cancer appears to translate into clinically meaningful improvements in survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. Version 2.2017.

  3. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aggarwal A, Liu ML, Krasnow SH. Breast cancer in male veteran population: an analysis from VA cancer registry. J Community Support Oncol. 2014;12(8):293–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Malley CD, Prehn AW, Shema SJ, Glaser SL. Racial/ethnic differences in survival rates in a population-based series of men with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;94(11):2836–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giordano SH, Cohen DS, Buzdar AU, Perkins G, Hortobagyi GN. Breast carcinoma in men: a population-based study. Cancer. 2004;101(1):51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stierer M, Rosen H, Weitensfelder W, et al. Male breast cancer: Austrian experience. World J Surg. 1995;19(5):687–92; discussion 692–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schaub NP, Maloney N, Schneider H, Feliberti E, Perry R. Changes in male breast cancer over a 30-year period. Am Surg. 2008;74(8):707–11; discussion 711–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ribeiro GG, Swindell R, Harris M, Banarjee SS, Cramer A. A review of the management of the male breast carcinoma based on an analysis of 420 treated cases. Breast. 1996;5:141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Golshan M, Rusby J, Dominguez F, Smith BL. Breast conservation for male breast carcinoma. Breast. 2007;16(6):653–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cloyd JM, Hernandez-Boussard T, Wapnir IL. Poor compliance with breast cancer treatment guidelines in men undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139(1):177–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cardoso F, Bartlett JMS, Slaets L, et al. Characterization of male breast cancer: results of the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NABCG International Male Breast Cancer Program. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(2):405–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cloyd JM, Hernandez-Boussard T, Wapnir IL. Outcomes of partial mastectomy in male breast cancer patients: analysis of SEER, 1983–2009. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1545–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jagsi R, Abrahamse P, Hawley ST, Graff JJ, Hamilton AS, Katz SJ. Underascertainment of radiotherapy receipt in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data. Cancer. 2012;118(2):333–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Korde LA, Zujewski JA, Kamin L, et al. Multidisciplinary meeting on male breast cancer: summary and research recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(12):2114–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fentiman IS, Fourquet A, Hortobagyi GN. Male breast cancer. Lancet. 2006;367(9510):595–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Greif JM, Pezzi CM, Klimberg VS, Bailey L, Zuraek M. Gender differences in breast cancer: analysis of 13,000 breast cancers in men from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. Oct 2012;19(10):3199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Massarweh SA, Sledge GW, Miller DP, McCullough D, Petkov VI, Shak S. Molecular characterization and mortality from breast cancer in men. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(14):1396–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Boffa DJ, Rosen JE, Mallin K, et al. Using the National Cancer Database for outcomes research: a review. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(12):1722–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4177–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmocker RK, Caretta-Weyer H, Weiss JM, et al. Determining breast cancer axillary surgery within the surveillance epidemiology and end results-Medicare database. J Surg Oncol. 2014;109(8):756–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lorimer PD, White RL, Walsh K, et al. Pediatric and adolescent melanoma: a National Cancer Data Base update. Ann Surg Oncol. Nov 2016;23(12):4058–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yi M, Meric-Bernstam F, Ross MI, et al. How many sentinel lymph nodes are enough during sentinel lymph node dissection for breast cancer? Cancer. 2008;113(1):30–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Garrido MM, Kelley AS, Paris J, et al. Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Serv Res. 2014;49(5):1701–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(8):567–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), McGale P, Taylor C, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9935):2127–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G, Darby S, McGale P, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1707–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu E, Suzuki H, Younus J, et al. The impact of post-mastectomy radiation therapy on male breast cancer patients: a case series. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(2):696–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jardel P, Vignot S, Cutuli B, et al. Should adjuvant radiation therapy be systematically proposed for male breast cancer? A systematic review. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(1):23–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Madden NA, Macdonald OK, Call JA, Schomas DA, Lee CM, Patel S. Radiotherapy and male breast cancer: a population-based registry analysis. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016;39(5):458–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Abrams MJ, Koffer PP, Wazer DE, Hepel JT. Postmastectomy radiation therapy is associated with improved survival in node-positive male breast cancer: a population analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98(2):384–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jatoi I, Benson JR, Kunkler I. Hypothesis: can the abscopal effect explain the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on breast cancer mortality? NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018;4:8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Bagaria SP, Wasif N, Rawal B, McLaughlin SA, Giuliano AE. Is mastectomy undertreatment for low-risk breast cancers eligible for breast-conserving therapy? Cancer. 2015;121(16):2705–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, Kokeny K, Agarwal J. Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Christiansen P, Carstensen SL, Ejlertsen B, et al. Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: overall and relative survival-a population based study by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Acta Oncol. 2018;57(1):19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Maishman T, Cutress RI, Hernandez A, et al. Local recurrence and breast oncological surgery in young women with breast cancer: the POSH Observational Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2017;266(1):165–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferzoco RM, Ruddy KJ. Optimal delivery of male breast cancer follow-up care: improving outcomes. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2015;7:371–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH (UL1TR001860) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (T32HS022236).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Candice A. M. Sauder MD.

Ethics declarations



Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 156 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bateni, S.B., Davidson, A.J., Arora, M. et al. Is Breast-Conserving Therapy Appropriate for Male Breast Cancer Patients? A National Cancer Database Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 26, 2144–2153 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: