Results from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Oncoplastic Surgery Committee 2017 Survey: Current Practice and Future Directions

Abstract

Introduction

Oncoplastic surgery is emerging as a validated, safe, patient-centric approach to breast cancer surgery in the United States. The American Society of Breast Surgeons Oncoplastic Surgery Committee (ASBrS-OSC) conducted a survey to assess the scope of practice and level of interest in oncoplastic surgery among its members. Furthermore, the group sought to identify barriers to incorporating oncoplastic skills in a surgeon’s practice.

Methods

A 10-question survey was administered in March 2017 to the entire ASBrS membership using an online format. Three solicitations were sent. Unique identifiers allowed a single response.

Results

Of the 2655 surveys sent out, 708 members responded. Nearly all (99%) respondents had at least some interest in oncoplastic surgery. The current rates of performing nipple-sparing mastectomy, adjacent tissue transfer, and breast reduction with lumpectomy were 80, 60, and 51%, respectively. A minority of respondents reported independently performing breast reductions/mammaplasties (19%) or contralateral symmetrization (10%). Barriers to learning oncoplastic surgery included surgeon’s time and access to oncoplastic educational material/courses. Most respondents felt that training courses and videos may allow them to better incorporate oncoplastic techniques in their practices.

Conclusions

The interest in oncoplastic surgery among U.S. surgeons is significant, yet there are barriers to incorporate these surgical techniques into a breast surgeon’s practice. As professional organizations provide access to effective training and enduring educational resources, breast surgeons will be enabled to develop their oncoplastic skill set and safely offer these techniques to their patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Chatterjee A, Dayicioglu D, Khakpour N, Czerniecki BJ. Oncoplastic surgery: keeping it simple with 5 essential volume displacement techniques for breast conservation in a patient with moderate- to large-sized breasts. Cancer Control. 2017;24(4):1073274817729043.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou MC. Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):26–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(3):145–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Clough KB, Ihrai T, Oden S, Kaufman G, Massey E, Nos C. Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer based on tumour location and a quadrant-per-quadrant atlas. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1389–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Holmes DR, Schooler W, Smith R. Oncoplastic approaches to breast conservation. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011;2011.

  6. 6.

    De La Cruz L, Blankenship SA, Chatterjee A, Geha R, Nocera N, Czerniecki BJ, et al. Outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;0(0):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Losken A, Hart AM, Chatterjee A. Updated evidence on the oncoplastic approach to breast conservation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):14S–22S.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kelsall JE, McCulley SJ, Brock L, Akerlund MTE, Macmillan RD. Comparing oncoplastic breast conserving surgery with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: Case-matched patient reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70:1377–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Weber WP, Soysal SD, El-Tamer M, Sacchini V, Knauer M, Tausch C, et al. First international consensus conference on standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165(1):139–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Audretsch WP, Rezai M, Kolotas C, Zamboglou N, Schnabel T, Bojar H. Tumor-specific immediate reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Perspect Plast Surg. 1998;11(01):71–100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Iqbal J, Ginsburg O, Rochon PA, Sun P, Narod SA. Differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer-specific survival by race and ethnicity in the United States. JAMA. 2015;313(2):165–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    De Lorenzi F, Loschi P, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N, Hubner G, Mazzarol G, et al. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for tumors larger than 2 centimeters: is it oncologically safe? A matched-cohort analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 23(6):1852–9.

  13. 13.

    Gass JS, Onstad M, Pesek S, Rojas K, Fogarty S, Stuckey A, et al. Breast-specific sensuality and sexual function in cancer survivorship: does surgical modality matter? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(11):3133–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hart AM, Pinell-White X, Egro FM, Losken A. The psychosexual impact of partial and total breast reconstruction: a prospective one-year longitudinal Study. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;75(3):281–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kwait RM, Pesek S, Onstad M, Edmonson D, Clark MA, Raker C, et al. Influential forces in breast cancer surgical decision making and the impact on body image and sexual function. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3403–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(2):145–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(6):503–10.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chatterjee A, Offodile II AC, Asban A, Minasian RA, Losken A, Graham R, et al. A cost-utility analysis comparing oncoplastic breast surgery to standard lumpectomy in large-breasted women. Adv Breast Cancer Res. 2018;07(02):14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chatterjee A. Long term effects of modern breast cancer surgery. Gland Surg. 2017.

  20. 20.

    Piper ML, Esserman LJ, Sbitany H, Peled AW. Outcomes following oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(Suppl 3):S222–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Down SK, Pereira JH, Leinster S, Simpson A. Training the oncoplastic breast surgeon—current and future perspectives. Gland Surg. 2013;2(3):126.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yilmaz OC, Cantürk NZ, Kebudi A, Güler SA, Erkek A, Rezai M, et al. The emerging role of national academies in surgical training: an inspiring environment for increasing the quality of health care in breast cancer management. J Cancer Educ. 2014;29(2):395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tenofsky PL, Dowell P, Topalovski T, Helmer SD. Surgical, oncologic, and cosmetic differences between oncoplastic and nononcoplastic breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2014;207(3):398–402. (discussion).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rancati A, Irigo M, Angrigiani C. Management of the ischemic nipple-areola complex after breast reduction. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43(2):403–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Losken A, Kapadia S, Egro FM, Baecher KM, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. Current opinion on the oncoplastic approach in the USA. Breast J. 2016;22(4):437–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Chatterjee MD, MBA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chatterjee, A., Gass, J., Burke, M.B. et al. Results from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Oncoplastic Surgery Committee 2017 Survey: Current Practice and Future Directions. Ann Surg Oncol 25, 2790–2794 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6586-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • American Society Of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS)
  • Oncoplastic Surgery
  • Oncoplastic Techniques
  • Breast Reduction
  • Adjacent Tissue Transfer