Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Positive Nipple Margin After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Alternative and Oncologically Safe Approach to Preserving the Nipple–Areolar Complex

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to describe a less aggressive approach to management of positive nipple margin following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), allowing for preservation of the nipple–areolar complex (NAC).

Study Design

A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing NSM from 1989 to 2017. Positive nipple margin was defined as any residual invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) within the additional nipple margin. Management included complete NAC removal, subareolar shave biopsy, or observation alone. Primary outcomes included rates of positive nipple margin and local recurrence.

Results

A total of 819 breasts underwent NSM, yielding a total of 32 breasts (3.9%) with positive nipple margin. Management included 11 (34.4%) subareolar shave biopsies, 15 (46.9%) complete NAC excisions, and 5 (15.6%) with observation alone, plus 1 (3.1%) lost to follow-up. Final pathology after subareolar shave biopsy did not reveal any residual disease, and no patients developed NAC necrosis or required NAC removal. Final pathology after NAC excision revealed 3 of 15 with additional disease (1 invasive ductal carcinoma, 2 DCIS). Of the five patients who had no subsequent intervention, tumor pathology was DCIS in all cases. One patient received adjuvant radiation therapy. Mean time to intervention was 3.7 ± 1.9 with mean follow-up of 2.9 years.

Conclusions

Management of positive nipple margin after NSM with subareolar shave biopsy is a safe alternative to preserve the NAC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coopey SB, Tang R, Lei L, et al. Increasing eligibility for nipple sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3218–3222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amara D, Peled AW, Wang F, et al. Tumor involvement of the nipple in total skin-sparing mastectomy: strategies for management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3803–3808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3117–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1665–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenberg RE, Chan JS, Swistel AJ, et al. Pathological evaluation of nipple-sparing mastectomies with emphasis on occult nipple involvement: the Weill–Cornell experience with 325 cases. Breast J. 2014;20:15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang R, Coopey SB, Merrill AL, et al. Positive nipple margins in nipple-sparing mastectomies: rates, management, and oncologic safety. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:1149–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alperovich M, Choi M, Karp NS, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and sub-areolar biopsy: to freeze or not to freeze? Evaluating the role of sub-areolar intraoperative frozen section. Breast J. 2016;22:18–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dent BL, Miller JA, Eden DJ, et al. Tumor-to-nipple distance as a predictor of nipple involvement: expanding the inclusion criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:1e–8e.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coopey SB, Smith BL. The nipple is just another margin. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3764–3766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1005–1014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stolier A. Techniques to avoid nipple and flap necrosis. In: Harness JK, Willey SC, eds. Operative Approaches to Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International (2017) pp.101–115.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleni A. Tousimis MD, FACS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haslinger, M.L., Sosin, M., Bartholomew, A.J. et al. Positive Nipple Margin After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Alternative and Oncologically Safe Approach to Preserving the Nipple–Areolar Complex. Ann Surg Oncol 25, 2303–2307 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6569-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6569-4

Keywords

Navigation