Prophylaxis of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Using Enoxaparin After Esophagectomy: A Prospective Observational Study of Effectiveness and Safety
- 149 Downloads
The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after esophagectomy is higher than in other gastroenterological cancer surgery. Although the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylaxis using enoxaparin have been established in orthopedic, abdominal, and pelvic surgeries, no studies regarding esophagectomy are available.
A prospective observational study was conducted to elucidate the usefulness of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis after esophagectomy. The study enrolled 30 patients who underwent elective esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between April 2015 and October 2016. During postoperative days 2–11, the patients received a subcutaneous injection of enoxaparin (2000 IU) twice daily. The primary end point for the study was the incidence of postoperative VTE. In addition, the incidence of all enoxaparin treatment- and operation-related adverse events was investigated. The study identified VTE by VTE protocol-enhanced computed tomography, performed routinely during and after enoxaparin treatment.
One pulmonary embolism (PE) (3.3%) and two deep vein thromboses (DVTs) (6.7%) were observed during enoxaparin treatment. In addition, one PE (3.6%) and four DVTs (14.3%) (one patient experienced both) were observed after treatment. All VTEs were asymptomatic. Regarding enoxaparin-related adverse events, four minor bleeds occurred but did not require discontinuation of enoxaparin. The incidence of postoperative morbidity was acceptable. In blood tests related to coagulation, no significant differences were observed between patients with and without VTE.
The authors believe that thromboprophylaxis using enoxaparin is safe and can prevent VTE after esophagectomy. However, its effectiveness is limited to the period of treatment, so additional prophylaxis may be recommended.
Drs. Naoya Yoshida and Takatsugu Ishimoto have course affiliation with Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd and Yakuruto Honsya Co., Ltd. Hideo Baba and the other co-authors (Y.B., Y.M., M.I., Y.H., Y.I., M.W.) have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 9.Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, Karanicolas PJ, Arcelus JI, Heit JA, Samama CM. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e227–77. Erratum in Chest. 2012;141:1369.Google Scholar
- 12.Parry K, Sadeghi AH, van der Horst S, Westerink J, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Intermittent pneumatic compression in combination with low-molecular-weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolic events in esophageal cancer surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115:181–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Nagata C, Tanabe H, Takakura S, Narui C, Saito M, Yanaihara N, Okamoto A. Randomized controlled trial of enoxaparin versus intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prevention in Japanese surgical patients with gynecologic malignancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41:1440–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, International Union Against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 7th ed. Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester; 2010Google Scholar
- 27.Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Sabra MJ, Smotherman C, Kraemer DF, Nussbaum MS, Tepas JJ Rd, Awad ZT. The effects of neoadjuvant therapy on morbidity and mortality of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2005–2012. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115:296–300.Google Scholar