Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of Lymphovascular Space Invasion by the Sarcomatous Component in Uterine Carcinosarcoma

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine the significance of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) with a sarcomatous component on the tumor characteristics and clinical outcomes of women with uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of a prior multicenter retrospective study that examined women with stage I–IV UCS who underwent primary hysterectomy. Archived histopathology slides were reviewed and LVSI was scored as follows: LVSI with a carcinomatous component alone (LVSI-carcinoma; n = 375, 76.8%) or LVSI containing a sarcomatous component with or without a carcinomatous component (LVSI-sarcoma; n = 113, 23.2%). Qualitative metrics of LVSI were correlated to clinicopathological factors and survival outcome.

Results

Tumors in the LVSI-sarcoma group were more likely to have sarcoma dominance (82.1 vs. 26.4%) heterologous sarcomatous component (51.3 vs. 37.9%), low-grade carcinoma (42.5 vs. 22.4%), and large tumor size (81.0 vs. 70.2%) in the primary tumor site compared with tumors in the LVSI-carcinoma group (all p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, LVSI-sarcoma was independently associated with decreased progression-free survival (5-year rates: 34.9 vs. 40.8%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–2.50, p < 0.001), and cause-specific survival (5-year rates: 41.8 vs. 55.9%, adjusted HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.39–2.75, p < 0.001) compared with LVSI-carcinoma. Postoperative radiotherapy for women with LVSI-sarcoma had a higher reduction rate of recurrence/progression of disease (54% reduction, p = 0.04) compared with postoperative radiotherapy for women with LVSI-carcinoma (26% reduction, p = 0.08).

Conclusion

In UCS, the presence of a sarcomatous component in LVSI is particularly prevalent when a tumor has sarcoma dominance. Our study suggests that LVSI containing a sarcomatous component may be a predictor of decreased survival for women with UCS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cantrell LA, Blank SV, Duska LR. Uterine carcinosarcoma: a review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137:581–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsuo K, Ross MS, Machida H, Blake EA, Roman LD. Trends of uterine carcinosarcoma in the United States. J Gynecol Oncol 2018;29:e22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, et al. Significance of histologic pattern of carcinoma and sarcoma components on survival outcomes of uterine carcinosarcoma. Ann Oncol 2016;27:1257–1266.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morice P, Piovesan P, Rey A, et al. Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion determined with hematoxylin-eosin staining in early stage cervical carcinoma: results of a multivariate analysis. Ann Oncol 2003;14:1511–1517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roman LD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, et al. Influence of quantity of lymph-vascular space invasion on the risk of nodal metastases in women with early-stage squamous cancer of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1998;68:220–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chernofsky MR, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, et al. Influence of quantity of lymph vascular space invasion on time to recurrence in women with early-stage squamous cancer of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100:288–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pol FJ, Zusterzeel PL, van Ham MA, Kuijpers DA, Bulten J, Massuger LF. Satellite lymphovascular space invasion: An independent risk factor in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015;138:579–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bosse T, Peters EE, Creutzberg CL, et al. Substantial lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) is a significant risk factor for recurrence in endometrial cancer—a pooled analysis of PORTEC 1 and 2 trials. Eur J Cancer 2015;51:1742–1750.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuo K, Garcia-Sayre J, Medeiros F, et al. Impact of depth and extent of lymphovascular space invasion on lymph node metastasis and recurrence patterns in endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol 2015;112:669–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guntupalli SR, Zighelboim I, Kizer NT, et al. Lymphovascular space invasion is an independent risk factor for nodal disease and poor outcomes in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:31–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuo K, Yessaian AA, Lin YG, et al. Predictive model of venous thromboembolism in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013;128:544–551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsuo K, Sheridan TB, Yoshino K, et al. Significance of lymphovascular space invasion in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Med 2013;1:156–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuo K, Yoshino K, Hiramatsu K, et al. Effect of lymphovascular space invasion on survival of stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:957–965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuo K, Sheridan TB, Mabuchi S, et al. Estrogen receptor expression and increased risk of lymphovascular space invasion in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2014;133:473–479.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuo K, Yoshino K, Hasegawa K, et al. Survival outcome of stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma with lympho-vascular space invasion. Gynecol Oncol 2015;136:198–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsuo K, Wong KK, Fotopoulou C, et al. Impact of lympho-vascular space invasion on tumor characteristics and survival outcome of women with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2018;117(2):236–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Creasman WT, Ali S, Mutch DG, et al. Surgical-pathological findings in type 1 and 2 endometrial cancer: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study on GOG-210 protocol. Gynecol Oncol 2017;145:519–525.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Altman AD, Ferguson SE, Atenafu EG, et al. Canadian high risk endometrial cancer (CHREC) consortium: analyzing the clinical behavior of high risk endometrial cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2015;139:268–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Harano K, Hirakawa A, Yunokawa M, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group. Int J Clin Oncol 2015;21:168–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cantrell LA, Havrilesky L, Moore DT, et al. A multi-institutional cohort study of adjuvant therapy in stage I–II uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2012;127:22–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wada H, Enomoto T, Fujita M, et al. Molecular evidence that most but not all carcinosarcomas of the uterus are combination tumors. Cancer Res 1997;57:5379–5385.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cherniack AD, Shen H, Walter V, et al. Integrated Molecular Characterization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Cancer Cell 2017;31:411–423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao S, Bellone S, Lopez S, et al. Mutational landscape of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas implicates histone genes in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016;113:12238–12243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferguson SE, Tornos C, Hummer A, Barakat RR, Soslow RA. Prognostic features of surgical stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31:1653–1661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Abdulfatah E, Lordello L, Khurram M, et al. Predictive histologic factors in carcinosarcomas of the uterus: a multiinstitutional study. Int J Gynecol Pathol. Epub 3 Apr 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/pgp.0000000000000497.

  26. Matsuo K, Ross MS, Bush SH, et al. Tumor characteristics and survival outcomes of women with tamoxifen-related uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2017;144:329–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Matsuo K, Omatsu K, Ross MS, et al. Impact of adjuvant therapy on recurrence patterns in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2017;145:78–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Matsuo K, Johnson MS, Im DD, et al. Survival outcome of women with stage IV uterine carcinosarcoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. J Surg Oncol 2018;117(3):488–496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Matsuo K, Ross MS, Yunokawa M, et al. Salvage chemotherapy with taxane and platinum for women with recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2017;147:565–571.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Matsuo K, Ross MS, Im DD, et al. Significance of venous thromboembolism in women with uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2018;148(2):267–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007;335:806–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;105:103–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1972;34:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mansfield ER, Helms BP. Detecting multicollinearity. Am Stat 1982;36:158–160.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rauh-Hain JA, Oduyebo T, Diver EJ, et al. Uterine leiomyosarcoma: an updated series. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23:1036–1043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang WL, Soslow R, Hensley M, et al. Histopathologic prognostic factors in stage I leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: a detailed analysis of 27 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2011;35:522–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Roma AA, Barbuto DA, Samimi SA, et al. Vascular invasion in uterine sarcomas and its significance. A multi-institutional study. Hum Pathol 2015;46:1712–1721.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dos Santos LA, Garg K, Diaz JP, et al. Incidence of lymph node and adnexal metastasis in endometrial stromal sarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121:319–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hensley ML. Role of chemotherapy and biomolecular therapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2011;25:773–782.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sampath S, Gaffney DK. Role of radiotherapy treatment of uterine sarcoma. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2011;25:761–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ducie JA, Leitao MM, Jr. The role of adjuvant therapy in uterine leiomyosarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2015;16:45–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Ensign Endowment for Gynecologic Cancer Research (KM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Matsuo.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

All listed authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuo, K., Takazawa, Y., Ross, M.S. et al. Significance of Lymphovascular Space Invasion by the Sarcomatous Component in Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 25, 2756–2766 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6547-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6547-x

Keywords

Navigation