The Impact of Pathological Tumor Regression and Nodal Status on Survival and Systemic Disease in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- 166 Downloads
Although tumor regression and nodal status are reported to be useful prognostic factors for patients with oesophageal cancer who are treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the clinical effects of those factors remain to be explained fully in neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, factor predictive of systemic disease after neoadjuvant therapy remain unexplored.
The impact of pathological tumor regression and the number of involved lymph nodes on survival and the occurrence of systemic disease were examined in 405 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy,
Among the 405 patients studied, 96 (23.7%) achieved good response, whereas 309 (76.3%) were classified as poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Systemic disease occurred in 136 patients (34.6%) of 393 patients who underwent curative esophagectomy. The number of involved lymph nodes and pathological tumor regression were associated with survival and the occurrence of systemic disease. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of involved lymph nodes was identified as an independent factor associated with both survival and the occurrence of systemic disease, together with the latest AJCC ypstage. However, tumor regression was not found to be an independent factor associated with survival and systemic disease in multivariate analysis.
Posttreatment nodal status rather than pathological tumor regression seems to be useful for predicting prognosis and the occurrence of systemic disease in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additional systemic therapy may be needed in patients with several involved lymph nodes remaining after neoadjuvant therapy.
- 11.Hoeppner J, Lordick F, Brunner T, et al. Prospective randomized controlled multicenter phase III trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT protocol) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS protocol) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (NCT02509286). BMC Cancer. 2016;16:503.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Nakamura K, Kato K, Igaki H, et al. Three-arm phase III trial comparing cisplatin plus 5-FU (CF) versus docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-FU (DCF) versus radiotherapy with CF (CF-RT) as preoperative therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer (JCOG1109, NExT study). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43:752–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Schneider PM, Baldus SE, Metzger R, et al. Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Implication for response classification. Ann Surg. 2005;5:684–92.Google Scholar
- 17.Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, et al. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Ann Surg. 2008;247:365–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases: Guidelines for the clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus (ed 10). Tokyo, Japan, Kanehara Syuppan, 2007.Google Scholar
- 27.Brierley J, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours eighth edition. Oxford: Wiley, 2017.Google Scholar
- 32.Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC, et al. Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathological correlations. Cancer 1994;73:2680–6.Google Scholar